US rich get richer on stock market investments while modest investors are left behind

Jun 26, 2014

In a new study, researchers from Imperial College Business School, Columbia University and the University of Maryland found that wealthy individuals in the US can get in relative terms up to 70 per cent times greater returns on their investments than those with modest wealth, when the yields on assets such as stocks and bonds are calculated. The team say that this further widens the income gap between rich and poor and potentially creates disparities in society.

Income inequality in the US has been steadily rising. According to a report by Oxfam International released earlier this year, the wealthiest one per cent has captured 95 per cent of post-financial crisis growth since 2009, while the bottom 90 per cent became poorer in the US.

The research is the first to offer a consistent explanation of generated from financial markets.

In particular, the team suggest that rich investors have better access to resources and advice from professionals such as asset managers. This enables them to better determine where to invest their money on the stock exchange. In contrast, investors with a modest income are unable to afford the same access to information and expertise and they're also wary of being exploited by rich investors. This means that they're less likely to invest in riskier stocks and bonds that could provide them with a higher return on investments.

Professor Marcin Kacperczyk, co-author of the report from Imperial College Business School, said:

"Understanding how income from stock market activity can add to income inequality is something that has never been fully explored by economists before. Our research shows that some wealthy individuals are making substantial profits on stock markets because they have tools at their disposal that individuals from modest incomes don't. This further creates a widening between rich and poor, which is bad for society, making it difficult to have equality of opportunity. "

Typically, economists have focused on inequality originating in labour markets by calculating the difference between the highest and lowest salaries of workers in the US. They also measure income inequality by determining the value of a range of different assets held by workers including homes, automobiles, personal valuables, businesses, savings and investments such as art and wine.

In the study, the researchers determine income inequality in the US, using data from Thomson Reuters that measured the income investors received from their stock market activity. They used this calculation to measure the income inequality between those from higher and lower wealth backgrounds.

In the future, the team aim to use the formula to shed more light on income inequality in the UK.

Explore further: Wealth inequality doubles among US households

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Rich-poor gap and the risk of civil war

Jun 04, 2014

Researchers from the University of Tübingen have found that the greater the disparity in wealth, the greater the risk of civil war. "If unequal division passes a certain level, the effects within a region are enormous," ...

Child abuse rises with income inequality, study shows

Feb 11, 2014

As the Great Recession deepened and income inequality became more pronounced, county-by-county rates of child maltreatment – from sexual, physical and emotional abuse to traumatic brain injuries and death – worsened, ...

Recommended for you

Consumer sentiment brightens holiday spending

Nov 27, 2014

Consumer confidence posted its fourth consecutive monthly gain in November, rising to its highest level since July 2007, according to the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gopher65
not rated yet Jun 26, 2014
The authors of this study almost hit the real cause of the current increase in income inequality, but juuuust missed it.

It's really very simple:

In order to become hyper-rich (multi-billionaire), you need to "make your money work for you", as the old saying goes. However, poor people *can't* make their money "work for them" because they're spending that money on basic necessities. The further up the wealth chart you go, the greater percentage of a person's net worth can be working for them to make more wealth.

Think about it this way. If two people are each investing 1% of their total wealth in the same stocks, their wealth will grow in lockstep. The richer of them will always be X% richer than the poor one. But if the rich person can afford to invest 99% of their wealth into stocks, while the poor person can only afford to invest 1% of *their* wealth, the rich person's wealth will automatically grow faster, and their will be an ever growing gap wealth distribution. Simple.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.