Pepper the emotional robot may just make you angry

Jun 16, 2014 by Nick Hawes
Take note: human finds salad hilarious. Credit: aldebaran

Softbank, a Japanese telecommunications giant, is selling what it is calling "the world's first personal robot that reads emotions". Pepper is designed to be a highly interactive household companion and was developed by Aldebaran, the company behind the successful Nao robot. But Pepper may not be all it's cracked up to be.

The major selling point of this robot, as highlighted by the developers, is that it is capable of emotional interaction with the people in its life. This is how they hope to avoid the unfortunate fate of other consumer household robots such as Aibo, which died out in 2005 and Wakamaru, which just never really took off.

On one level this seems a simple claim: we all have emotional interactions with technology in our lives. You only have to watch someone try to deal with a frozen computer, a stubborn car or a new smartphone to see how intense those emotions can be. But Pepper will not just be the recipient of one-way emotion, it will be able to recognise your emotions and learn to respond appropriately.

This ability has two parts. First Pepper must be able to recognise your emotions. This is a problem that has been tackled in many ways in , from using facial expressions to body posture to voice tone. It is not clear which exact approach Pepper is taking, but, if it is based on existing technology, it is likely that it will make simple, shallow connections between easily observed features and a pre-defined emotion. It will associate a frown with sadness or a smile with happiness.

To make this work well you need both a sensible set of emotions to recognise and a algorithm capable of recognising the connected features reliably. Unfortunately psychologists are a long way from agreeing on a theory of emotions, and most recognition systems struggle when presented with the range of sensory inputs experienced by robots in every day situations such as different head angles, heights and lighting.

To learn the correct response to the emotions it recognises, Pepper will try different responses and monitor the reaction it receives. It will then share its results with other Peppers around the world via the internet. And with claims that there will be tens or even hundreds of thousands of Peppers feeding information to each other, the idea is that they will quickly be able to follow any detected emotions with an appropriate response. It's essentially the big data approach to emotional behaviour.

Aibo, once the future of dog, now extinct. Credit: mathatelle, CC BY-NC


Although this may sound appealing, we shouldn't get too excited by the promises made about Pepper. It's not really clear what kind of interactions will actually be made better as a result of this robot's abilities. Pepper's developers suggest it might play a song to cheer you up when you're down, for example, but a a real emotional reaction is more than simply having something correctly diagnose your current emotional state and try to make a corrective response.

Both human emotion and human interaction are rich, complex processes and simple, conditioned robot responses may make the overall experience worse than having no emotion at all. Not everyone has the same response to emotion either, so what may be a good response for one person may be bad for another. One might feel instantly better when Pepper plays them a little Pharrell Williams, another might want to throw their new toy across the room.

There is a very real danger of building up unrealistic expectations of autonomous robots and intelligent systems. If scientists claim they can deliver interactions, but instead deliver a sophisticated but flawed toy, then who's to say that anyone will take the field seriously again in the future.

The same can be said for researchers who claim that the recent success of a chatbot in the Turing test shows we've made serious progress towards . We haven't, the chatbot was just better at gaming the system than many others, and this isn't reflective of more general intelligence.

The public should be wary of grand claims about machine intelligence, robotic or otherwise. The lesson for scientists is for us to produce richer, more nuanced definitions of the complex phenomena we are trying to create, such as intelligence and emotion. Trying to push a product like Pepper on consumers too soon could make it harder to achieve our goals in the long term.

Explore further: Emotional robot set for sale in Japan next year (Update 3) (w/ Video)

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

How technology can influence people's emotions

May 07, 2014

Sharing emotions is a central part of human communication. Moreover, the internet is becoming an important medium to share them. And this has given rise to collective emotions in online groups. But emotions ...

Recommended for you

Future US Navy: Robotic sub-hunters, deepsea pods

23 hours ago

The robotic revolution that transformed warfare in the skies will soon extend to the deep sea, with underwater spy "satellites," drone-launching pods on the ocean floor and unmanned ships hunting submarines.

Festo has BionicANTs communicating by the rules for tasks

Mar 27, 2015

Germany-based automation company Festo, focused on technologies for tasks, turns to nature for inspiration, trying to take the cues from how nature performs tasks so efficiently. "Whether it's energy efficiency, ...

Virtual robotization for human limbs

Mar 26, 2015

Recent advances in computer gaming technology allow for an increasingly immersive gaming experience. Gesture input devices, for example, synchronise a player's actions with the character on the screen. Entertainment ...

Robots on reins could be the 'eyes' of firefighters

Mar 25, 2015

Researchers at King's College London have developed revolutionary reins that enable robots to act like guide dogs, which could enable that firefighters moving through smoke-filled buildings could save vital ...

Robot revolution will change world of work

Mar 24, 2015

Robots will fundamentally change the shape of the workforce in the next decade but many industries will still need a human touch, a QUT Future of Work Conference has heard.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jun 16, 2014
You know you're in a bad place when you start believing robots that say "I love you!"
not rated yet Jun 16, 2014
This whole emo debate is kind of irrelevant to the fact that with the low price and extreme maneuverability this will truly be the first ever large size humanoid robot that most people can afford to buy. It`s an historic moment. Imagined for decades in books and movies all around the world. This is really a big thing. So if they can keep the low price point and slowly continue to upgrade and improve it will certainly become big and mainstream. Like your own Rosy the Robot. And like the First Personal Home Computer! Lets not forget this French company behind the robot it`s other NAO robot is the most sold small humanoid on the planet. It is used at hundreds of top universities around the world so has seen a lot of basic improvements over the years especially on software. Add the great movement and other great hardware of Pepper and software beyond NAO and low price and you really have a first great very simple! household human sized robot. The under 2000 dollar price will jump start it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.