National panel urges 'putting human boots' on Mars

Jun 11, 2014 by Blaine Friedlander
Mars

After 18 months of research and deliberation, the Committee on Human Spaceflight – a diverse national group of scientists and professionals convened by Congressional request, and co-led by a Cornell professor – issued a 285-page report June 4 on whether Earth-bound humans should continue exploring space.

The conclusion: Let's go red – proceed toward the red planet, Mars.

"Among this small set of plausible goals, the most distant and difficult is putting human boots on the surface of Mars; thus that is the horizon goal for ," said Jonathan Lunine, Cornell's David C. Duncan Professor of Physical Sciences and co-chair of the Committee on Human Spaceflight of the National Research Council (NRC). "All long-range space programs by our potential partners converge on this goal."

In relative terms, the committee – co-chaired by Mitchell E. Daniels Jr., president of Purdue University and former governor of Indiana – urged remaining in the solar neighborhood, as Mars is the next planet over. The committee called for achievable, stepping-stone and intermediate missions prior to Mars. "The only feasible destinations for human exploration are the moon, asteroids, Mars and the moons of Mars," Lunine said.

In the report, the group provided rationale for continuing human spaceflight. In these discussions, NASA has always cited economic benefits, national security, and inspiration for science and engineering education. At a Washington, D.C., press conference announcing the new report, Lunine highlighted humanity's innate craving to discover. "[It is a] seemingly almost-universal desire of humankind to move outward and explore unknown realms," he said.

Contained within the report are strategies and suggestions on how the U.S. could lead the decadeslong effort. For humanity's hike to Mars – aimed for the 2030s but likely to occur in the 2050s – the committee says NASA must work with an international team, including the Chinese.

The report suggests three distinct, example technical pathways that could culminate in landing on the surface of Mars. Completing any of them requires the development of a number of mission elements and technological capabilities, including Mars entry, descent, landing, radiation safety and in-space propulsion, according to the report. These capabilities will be the most difficult to develop in terms of costs and technical challenges, the says.

"Any human exploration program will only succeed if it is appropriately funded and receives a sustained commitment on the part of those who govern our nation," Daniels said. "That commitment cannot change direction election after election. Our elected leaders are the critical enablers of the nation's investment in , and only they can assure that the leadership, personnel, governance and resources are in place in our program."

Congress requested the study in the 2010 NASA Authorization Act. That legislation directed the space agency to contract the NRC to conduct the study, which officially got underway in December 2012.

Explore further: NASA should maintain long-term focus on Mars as 'horizon goal' for human spaceflight

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

NASA warned plan to send humans to Mars may fail

Jun 06, 2014

The US space agency NASA has been warned that its mission to send humans to Mars will fail unless its revamps its methods and draws up a clear, well-planned strategy to conquer the red planet.

NASA suggests humans could be on Mars by 2035

May 28, 2014

(Phys.org) —At the European Lunar Symposium held at the Museum earlier this month, NASA officials revealed that the Moon could be used as a practice ground for sending humans to Mars within 20 years.

Recommended for you

Internet moguls Musk, Bezos shake up US space race

Sep 20, 2014

The space race to end America's reliance on Russia escalated this week with a multibillion dollar NASA award for SpaceX's Elon Musk and an unexpected joint venture for Blue Origin's Jeff Bezos.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

eric_in_chicago
not rated yet Jun 11, 2014
Yeah. whatever....

Retool/recycle the ISS for transport and installation on the moon (instead of burn and crash my tax dollars in the ocean) and then I will be impressed enough to support this.

Otherwise, we know how much money is going to be wasted and how little science will be done for my dollar...

If we can't get some answers as to whether there are natural voids in the moon and what we can build in there, you won't get space cadets like me to sign up for this suicide mission...not with my tax dollar or anything else.