No, metal oxide nanoparticles in your food won't kill you

Jun 04, 2014 by Andrew Maynard
Drink without worry. Credit: tambako, CC BY

Recently the American publication Mother Jones published an article on the dangers of food laced with tiny metal oxide particles. The article, however, is laced with errors and misinformation.

The source material for the article came from a report by the environmental organisation Friends of the Earth, an online database of nanotechnology-based and a peer-reviewed paper published in 2012. However, the analysis of the information is flawed.

Tom Philpott, author of Mother Jones article, claims nanoparticles – defined as particles smaller than 100 nanometres, which is a thousandth of the width of a human hair – are used because they behave differently from other particles. He is worried that scientists still don't know how dangerous these differences make them. He also claims that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has done nothing to slow down their rapid move into the food supply.

Bad journalism

The inventory Philpott cites is the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies Consumer Products Inventory, which I helped establish in 2006 as a way better understand the increasing number of consumer that were using engineered nanomaterials. It provides a useful but only qualitative sense of what was being used where, and relies on intermittent web searches and other sources of intelligence. The inventory was never meant to be comprehensive or authoritative.

In 2013 the inventory was updated to include further information on products and materials where it was available. As part of this update, products from a peer review paper published the previous year were included – a study, published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology, reported an analysis of nearly 90 food products for the presence of the material titanium dioxide.

Titanium dioxide has been used widely in foods for decades as a whitener and a base for other colors. It is considered to be an inert and safe material. The US FDA allows food products to contain up to 1% titanium dioxide without the need to include it on the ingredient label, as long as the substance added conforms to stringent levels of purity.

Usually referred to as Food Grade titanium dioxide, or additive E171 in Europe, the white powder is typically made up of particles a few hundred nanometers in diameter – a particle size that reflects visible light extremely well. In the 2012 paper researchers bought a selection of white or pale processed foods and tested them for the presence of titanium dioxide. They discovered that some products contained as high as 0.4% titanium dioxide by weight, and others as little as 0.0002% titanium dioxide by weight. The researchers also measured the particle size of the titanium dioxide particles in some products, and found the majority of particles to be larger than 100 nanometers in diameter, as would be expected for food grade titanium dioxide.

The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies Consumer Products Inventory currently lists 96 food products that contain nanoparticles. Of these, 89 are taken directly from the paper in Environmental Science and Technology. Of the remaining seven, four are no longer commercially available as far as can be ascertained, one is not an actual product, and one is a dietary supplement. This leaves just one nanotechnology-based in the inventory that is still available and doesn't contain food-grade titanium dioxide.

(Na)no harm

These 89 titanium dioxide containing products represent only a tiny fraction of products that have been available since before the term nanotechnology was popularised. And while they undoubtedly contain some small particles – most powders contain at least a few particles that are nanometer sized – they are there to ensure that the food products have bright, vibrant colors.

But in their report Friends of the Earth used the Consumer Product Inventory to claim there has been:

…a ten-fold increase in unregulated, unlabeled 'nanofood' products on the American market
over the past six years. In 2008 we found eight food and beverage products with nano-ingredients on the market. In 2014, the number of nanofood and beverage products we know to be on the market has grown to 94.

Their matches the Consumer Products Inventory, including those items that are either no longer commercially available, or not actual food products. And given that the inventory was updated recently, it is easy to see where the "ten-fold increase" comes from. If the journalist had got in touch with the founders of the inventory, it would have been clear that such an increase says nothing about the real number of food products using titanium dioxide.

Safety first

As someone who works on the risks and benefits of nanotechnology, I can see how errors in translation crept into this story. The 2012 paper was addressing a legitimate concern that little is know about how much is in the processed chain. The Consumer Products Inventory provides important and unique insights into nanoparticles being used in products. Friends of the Earth have every right to ask what is known about the potential risks in what we're eating. And reporters like Philpott have a professional obligation to highlight issues of concern and interest to their readers.

Each player in this case has played a legitimate role. But in this case, Philpott did not take the effort of speaking to experts to hear their views. Instead he bought the line that Friends of the Earth had in their report and wrote an article that only spreads misinformation.

Health journalism is tricky business. Journalists should be extra careful before putting out information in the public domain. They are right to highlight genuine issues, but the least they can do is get experts to weigh in on the debate. Simply basing a report on a one-sided view, which most scientists wouldn't even agree on, is poor journalism.

Explore further: Nanotechnology used in sunscreens

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Nanotechnology used in sunscreens

May 14, 2014

The cosmetic industry is one of the most competitive in the world, that is why is noteworthy that a Mexican development is part of one of the most pervasive innovations in recent years. It is the application ...

Nanotechnology: not just for geeks

Oct 02, 2007

Say “nanotechnology,” and geeks imagine iPhones, laptops and flash drives. But more than 60 percent of the 580 products in a newly updated inventory of nanotechnology consumer products are such “un-geeky” items as ...

Are silver nanoparticles harmful?

Mar 14, 2012

Silver nanoparticles cause more damage to testicular cells than titanium dioxide nanoparticles, according to a recent study by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. However, the use of both types may affect testicular ...

Making a common cosmetic and sunblock ingredient safer

Sep 25, 2013

Using a particular type of titanium dioxide—a common ingredient in cosmetics, food products, toothpaste and sunscreen—could reduce the potential health risks associated with the widely used compound. ...

Recommended for you

Gold nanorods target cancer cells

Dec 18, 2014

Using tiny gold nanorods, researchers at Swinburne University of Technology have demonstrated a potential breakthrough in cancer therapy.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nik_2213
1 / 5 (2) Jun 04, 2014
I'd rather not have titanium dioxide in my food, same as I'd rather not drown my food in gravy or ketchup. Simple personal tastes aside, I shudder when a rational query goes viral. The 'usual suspects' will be blaming this for Autism, next. (FWIW, I have an 'Aspergers Spectrum' friend; he was NOT vaccinated for MMR etc until after symptoms developed.)

D'uh, if you want a truly scary assessment of the general public's lack of scientific nous, ask their position on the widespread use of deadly 'Dihydrogen Monoxide'...
ormondotvos
not rated yet Jun 04, 2014
The author no doubt has received serious pressure about his report being used against the additive industry. His only reason for putting titanium dioxide in food is to make it pretty.
scalefreenetwork
not rated yet Jun 04, 2014
The Friends of the Earth report and Mother Jones article raise serious concerns about recent increases in the use nano-titanium dioxide, nano-silver, nano-zinc oxide and other nanomaterials in food products and packaging over the last few years - along with evidence suggesting the real potential for harm from nanotoxicology research...along with matching concerns that our regulators aren't forcing these manufacturers to treat these nanomaterials as new ingredients (triggering new safety testing), even though they are often being used for their new or enhanced properties.

But rather than presenting or discussing evidence based on controlled, scientific experiments which prove the safe use of metal oxide nanoparticles in human foodstuffs, you choose to argue about some small detail...
Oh, and speaking of 'Bad Journalism', your headline - "No, metal oxide nanoparticles in your food won't kill you" is a totally irresponsible blanket statement for a scientist to tell the public....

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.