Mesoscale eddies found to move far more ocean water than previously thought

Jun 27, 2014 by Bob Yirka report
Three-dimensional structure of an oceanic mesoscale eddy and the fluid trapped by this eddy. Credit: Sergey Kryazhimskiy

(Phys.org) —A trio of researchers, two from the Ocean University of China, and a third from the University of Hawaii, has found that mesoscale eddies—swirling masses of water that travel westward in the subtropics—appear to carry far more water with them than scientists have realized. In their paper published in the journal Science, Zhengguang Zhang, Wei Wang and Bo Qiu discuss the study they undertook of the water vortices using altimetry and data from ARGO submersibles to measure the size of the eddies and to track their movements over time.

Mesoscale eddies are spinning masses of water (50 to 300 miles in diameter) that fall between observable eddies such as those created by ships and very large ones known as gyres. Scientists have known about them for quite some time, but till now, very little was known about their size and movements. To find out more, the researchers analyzed data from both satellites and submersible probes.

Satellites operated by NASA have radar onboard that is sensitive enough to measure the altitude of the Earth's surface to within inches—and that includes the oceans. Mesoscale eddies can be detected due to depressions formed as they spin. The researchers collected a decade's worth of such data allowing them to create an animated map that shows the movement of multiple mesoscale eddies across the oceans—always moving east to west, and generally in subtropical regions, where background flows are weak. The team also studied data from the more than 3,000 ARGO submersibles that have been deployed to various depths in the world's oceans—that allowed them to create 3D renderings of the eddies as they exist beneath the surface.

Putting all the data together, the team was able to see that such eddies can live for months, or even years—it also allowed for calculating how much water they carry, approximately 30-40 Sv (1 Sv = 106 m3 s−1), which is roughly equivalent to the amount of ocean water moved by wind or due to temperature variations. The amount is far more than most oceanographers had imagined, and stirs questions regarding the role they may play as the oceans grow warmer.

The researchers plan to continue their research, focusing most specifically on how tightly the eddies hold on to material they capture, such as floating debris, pollutants, heat and carbon.

Explore further: Why locating MH370 in the Southern Ocean is so difficult

More information: Oceanic Mass Transport by Mesoscale Eddies, Science DOI: 10.1126/science.1252418

ABSTRACT
Oceanic transports of heat, salt, and fresh water, dissolved CO2 and other tracers regulate global climate change and distribution of natural marine resources. While the time-mean ocean circulation transports fluid as a conveyor belt, fluid parcels can also be trapped and transported discretely by migrating mesoscale eddies. By combining available satellite altimetry and Argo profiling float data, we show that the eddy-induced zonal mass transport can reach a total meridionally integrated value up to 30-40 Sv (1 Sv = 106 m3 s−1), and it occurs mainly in subtropical regions where the background flows are weak. This transport is comparable in magnitude with that of the large-scale, wind- and thermohaline-driven circulation.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mesoscale ocean eddies impact weather, study shows

Jul 07, 2013

Not only large-scale ocean currents impact weather but also relatively small eddies, as a new study by scientists at ETH Zurich reveals. The researchers therefore recommend to account for these eddies in ...

A swirling oasis of life

Feb 14, 2012

A serpentine eddy swirls in the southern Indian Ocean several hundred kilometers off the coast of South Africa in this natural-color image, acquired by NASA’s Terra satellite on December 26, 2011.

Recommended for you

Sculpting tropical peaks

4 hours ago

Tropical mountain ranges erode quickly, as heavy year-round rains feed raging rivers and trigger huge, fast-moving landslides. Rapid erosion produces rugged terrain, with steep rivers running through deep ...

Volcano expert comments on Japan eruption

5 hours ago

Loÿc Vanderkluysen, PhD, who recently joined Drexel as an assistant professor in Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science in the College of Arts and Sciences, returned Friday from fieldwork ...

NASA's HS3 looks Hurricane Edouard in the eye

18 hours ago

NASA and NOAA scientists participating in NASA's Hurricane and Severe Storms Sentinel (HS3) mission used their expert skills, combined with a bit of serendipity on Sept. 17, 2014, to guide the remotely piloted ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

retrosurf
5 / 5 (2) Jun 27, 2014
It's interesting that this result is from data that had already been collected.

There's a typo in the citation section which tripped me up:
Sv = 106 m3 s−1
should have the 6, the 3 and the -1 as all superscripts.

A Sverdrup is a million cubic meters per second.
RhoidSlayer
1 / 5 (6) Jun 27, 2014
part of what a 17 trillion debt buys , now if the captain will plug some holes and get the engine running again before we sink or get laid up in dry dock
supamark23
5 / 5 (7) Jun 27, 2014
part of what a 17 trillion debt buys , now if the captain will plug some holes and get the engine running again before we sink or get laid up in dry dock


Thanks for bringing politics into a science article, really classy... now go away.
RhoidSlayer
1 / 5 (5) Jun 27, 2014
Thanks for bringing politics into a science article, really classy... now go away.

reminding science of the state of it's patronage would seem a service , but I'll accept your opinion and advice . Not my dog .
Mike_Massen
5 / 5 (4) Jun 28, 2014
RhoidSlayer defending his blurt so badly with
reminding science of the state of it's patronage would seem a service ,..Not my dog .
You RhoidSlayer are totally wrong.
The bulk of 'Science' which is the "discipline of the acquisition of knowledge" needs no criticism from you RhoidSlayer, especially as debt you refer to (in USA) is predominantly the result of non-science activities, the largest by far is military etc & compounding.

There are well studied statistics that expenditure on Science's ROI is far greater than expenditure beyond mere compounding & including value of core US debt.

RhoidSlayer, if you are compelled for whatever egotistical reason & anti-science stance to 'mouth off' & off topic either:-

1. Don't
or
2. Get your facts straight.

Sadly your rant betrays your prejudice against Science.

I agree with supamark23, now please RhoidSlayer go away, you are far out of your depth & also display a serious lack of education, not your dog for sure, go away !
AlexCoe
1 / 5 (4) Jun 28, 2014
I wonder how much variability this adds to the computer models for weather and climate research. I have thought for some time that some of the changes in ocean currents and temp were directly related to plate tectonics rather than the more common attributions, this adds one more fly in the ointment.