Australia shark cull could snare more than 900

Jun 10, 2014
This image taken on February 22 by the Sea Shepherd Australia Ltd shows a tiger shark caught off Moses Rock in Western Australia

Australia's controversial shark cull could snare more than 900 animals over the next three years, a government review found, angering critics who said Tuesday most were caught needlessly.

Western Australia state has applied to national authorities to extend the policy designed to protect swimmers, under which sharks are captured using bait, and then killed if they are a threatening size.

It is not known how many of those captured will be destroyed, but in the three-month trial begun in January most animals were tagged and released.

Under the new proposal, released to the public by the state's Environmental Protection Authority on Monday, 72 baited hooks attached to floating drums will be put in place between November and April until 2017.

Most will be set one kilometre (around half a mile) offshore at the busiest beaches, with 12 kept in reserve when more lines are needed during a or threat.

"The deployment of drum lines is the most recent shark hazard mitigation measure to be considered by the government... to address the safety of water users," the state government said.

But the prospect of continued drum lines has angered conservationists who say it flies in the face of international obligations to protect the great white shark.

State opposition fisheries spokesman Dave Kelly told AFP the drum lines were also snaring tiger sharks, which were not responsible for the attacks.

About 900 tiger sharks and 25 great white sharks are projected to be caught during the cull. The drum lines will be taken down between May 1 and November 14 each year to avoid the annual migration of whales along Western Australia's coast.

"No one believes that tiger sharks have been responsible for the recent attacks here in Western Australia, so why target a species like when that's not going to have any impact on beach safety," Kelly said.

"The species that people think are responsible for most of the attacks are obviously great white sharks. If the (policy) is going to have minimal, if any, impact on numbers, that just begs the question—why do it?"

Sharks are common in Australian waters, and experts say attacks are increasing in line with population growth and the popularity of water sports.

There have been 170 fatal attacks in the last 100 years in Australia, according to the national Shark Attack File based at Sydney's Taronga Zoo.

Explore further: More than 170 sharks caught in Australia cull policy

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Thousands rally against shark cull in Australia

Feb 01, 2014

Thousands of people rallied across Australia Saturday against a controversial shark culling policy designed to prevent attacks, saying killing the marine animals was the not the answer.

First shark killed in Australia cull

Jan 26, 2014

The first shark caught under a controversial new Australian culling policy aimed at reducing fatal attacks was shot dead Sunday after being snared, angering conservationists.

Australia to go ahead with shark 'kill' zones

Jan 21, 2014

A controversial policy to catch and kill sharks off popular west coast beaches got the green light in Australia, in a move the Humane Society Tuesday termed a "complete disgrace".

Recommended for you

Is fleet diversity key to sustainable fisheries?

5 hours ago

Concern about fisheries is widespread around the world. Over the past several decades, a robust discussion has taken place concerning how to manage fisheries better to benefit ecosystems and humans. Much of the discussion ...

Strange, fanged deer persists in Afghanistan

6 hours ago

More than 60 years after its last confirmed sighting, a strange deer with vampire-like fangs still persists in the rugged forested slopes of northeast Afghanistan according to a research team led by the Wildlife ...

Captive rhinos exposed to urban rumbles

7 hours ago

The soundtrack to a wild rhinoceros's life is wind passing through the savannah grass, birds chirping, and distant animals moving across the plains. But a rhinoceros in a zoo listens to children screaming, cars passing, and ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

chrisn566
not rated yet Jun 10, 2014
Yes,because the seas obviously should be the domain of humans! Oh,wait....

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.