Study reveals shock-absorbing ability of woodpecker beaks

May 07, 2014 by Bob Yirka report
A male Red-bellied Woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus). Credit: Ken Thomas/public domain

(Phys.org) —A team of researchers at Mississippi State University has found that the beaks of woodpeckers are constructed in such a way as to help dissipate energy. In their paper published in Journal of the Royal Society Interface, the team describes their work in analyzing the beaks of several red-bellied woodpeckers and how they found that it has three layers that all help to absorb shocks as the bird pecks away at trees looking for insects inside.

Most everyone knows that woodpeckers bang away at trees (or sometimes other structures) with their beaks to create holes that allow them access to insects hidden inside. Prior research has shown that have a variety of features throughout their heads that help absorb shock, preventing the birds from suffering brain or other damage as they hunt for their prey. In this new effort, the researchers sought to learn if there was anything special about their beaks that might also help soften the internal blow as the birds hammer away at a tree, between one and three hundred times a minute.

Close inspection revealed that the beak's outer or rhamphotheca layer was made of a keratin sheath, which was, like most birds, arranged in a scale pattern, with defined edges between each scale. There was one major difference however, the scale edges, which are not straight but follow a zig-zag course (and have been nick-named sutures because they resemble those used in surgery), were much more wiggly than other pecking birds, such as chickens. This, the researchers noted, would help deflect compressing forces as the beak hit the wood. They found that the scales were also thinner and more elongated than other pecking birds as well, which appears to allow for more sliding of scales over one another during pecking, serving as a shock-absorber.

The researchers also found that the middle "foam" layer of the bird's beak, was more porous than other pecking birds, which would of course allow for directing the energy from impacts into other parts of the head that are better able to handle the abuse.

Taken as a whole, it appears a woodpecker's beak offers a first line of defense against head damage when pecking, dissipating energy where possible and directing the rest to where it will do the least damage.

Explore further: Beak evolution in some dinosaurs likely associated with diet, not flight, study shows

More information: Hierarchical multiscale structure– property relationships of the Red-bellied Woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus) beak. N. Lee et al. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2014. rsif.royalsocietypublishing.or… .1098/rsif.2014.0274

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Why do woodpeckers resist head impact injury?

Oct 26, 2011

Head injury is a common concern around the world, but researchers suggest that woodpeckers may have an answer for minimizing such devastating injuries. As reported in the Oct. 26 issue of the online journal PLoS ONE, an ana ...

First fossil bird with teeth specialized for tough diet

Jan 07, 2013

Beak shape variation in Darwin's finches is a classic example of evolutionary adaptation, with beaks that vary widely in proportions and shape, reflecting a diversity of ecologies. While living birds have ...

Recommended for you

Smarter than a first-grader?

8 hours ago

In Aesop's fable about the crow and the pitcher, a thirsty bird happens upon a vessel of water, but when he tries to drink from it, he finds the water level out of his reach. Not strong enough to knock over ...

How honey bees stay cool

19 hours ago

Honey bees, especially the young, are highly sensitive to temperature and to protect developing bees, adults work together to maintain temperatures within a narrow range. Recently published research led by ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Anda
4 / 5 (1) May 08, 2014
Weird rating!!
What's the problem with that finding? People disagree? People would like to have this ability?
What's wrong ? ... :)
hrfJC
1 / 5 (2) May 08, 2014
Why low ratings? Probably from distressed Darwinians who realize that such ingenious complexity could never have evolved by any random sequence of mutations in any time frame, thus exposing them as irrational believers in Dawkins' ruminations, Grimm's fairytales or supernatural Disney cartoons.