Physicists confirm existence of new type of meson

May 01, 2014
This is a display of a collision. Credit: Syracuse University

(Phys.org) —Physicists in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University have made several important discoveries regarding the basic structure of mesons—subatomic particles long thought to be composed of one quark and one antiquark and bound together by a strong interaction.

Recently, Professor Tomasz Skwarnicki and a team of researchers proved the existence of a meson named Z(4430), with two quarks and two antiquarks, using data from the Large Hadron Collidor beauty (LHCb) Collaboration at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. This tetraquark state was first discovered in Japan in 2007 but was later disputed by a team of researchers at Stanford University. Skwarnicki's finding was published earlier this month and has since garnered international publicity.

Quarks are hard, point-like objects that are found inside protons and neutrons and form the nucleus of an atom.

Now, another analysis by Syracuse University physicists—this one led by Distinguished Professor Sheldon Stone and his research associate Liming Zhang—shows two lighter, well-known mesons, originally thought to be composed of tetraquarks, that are structured like normal mesons.

Stone says that one of the particles, uniquely named the f0(980), was assumed to have four quarks because it seemed to be the only way for its mass to "make sense."

"The four-quark states cannot be classified within the traditional quark model, where strongly interacting particles [hadrons] are formed from either quark-antiquarks pairs [mesons] or three quarks [baryons]," says Stone, who also heads up Syracuse University's High-Energy Physics Group. "They are, therefore, called 'exotic particles.'"

Stone points out that his and Skwarnicki's analyses are not contradictory and, together, increase what physicists know about the that forms the basis of what holds all matter together.

Stone's finding also changes what is known about charge-parity (CP) violation, the balance of matter and antimatter in the universe. That there is a small amount of excess matter (e.g., protons, neutrons and orbiting electrons) floating around in the ether implies that something other than the Standard Model of particle physics is at play.

"Fourteen billion years ago, energy coalesced to form equal quantities of matter and antimatter," Stone says. "But as the universe cooled and expanded, its composition changed. Antimatter all but disappeared after the Big Bang, leaving behind matter to create everything around us, from stars and galaxies to life on Earth. Something must have happened, during this process, to cause extra CP violation and, thus, form the universe as we know it. … The f0(980) is a crucial element in our studies of CP violation. Showing that it is not an exotic particle means we do not have to question the interpretation of our results."

Stone also hopes his findings may shed light on why are able to form four-quark particles and light ones cannot.

"How do you explain some of the interesting characteristics of f0(980), if it's not made of four ?" asks Stone, whose analysis also draws on LHCb data and has been submitted for publication.

Meanwhile, the tetraquark nature of Z(4430) also has huge implications for the study of neutron stars, remnants of gravitational collapses of massive stars.

"Everything we're doing at Syracuse University and CERN is pushing the boundaries of 'new physics,'" Stone says. "Because we're using large data sets, we have no choice but to use statistically powerful analyses that can measure particle properties in an unambiguous manner."

LHCb is an international experiment, based at CERN, involving more than 800 scientists and engineers from all over the world. At CERN, Stone heads up a team of 15 physicists from Syracuse University.

Explore further: How CERN's discovery of exotic particles may affect astrophysics

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Quirky quark combination creates exotic new particle

Apr 10, 2014

Since the spectacular discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012, physicists at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the gigantic particle accelerator outside Geneva, have suffered a bit of a drought when it comes ...

LHCb experiment observes new matter-antimatter difference

Apr 24, 2013

(Phys.org) —The LHCb collaboration at CERN today submitted a paper to Physical Review Letters on the first observation of matter-antimatter asymmetry in the decays of the particle known as the B0s. It is only the fourth sub-at ...

Quark matter's connection with the Higgs

Aug 27, 2012

(Phys.org)—You may think you've heard everything you need to know about the origin of mass. After all, scientists colliding protons at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Europe recently presented stunning ...

Recommended for you

How Paramecium protozoa claw their way to the top

Sep 19, 2014

The ability to swim upwards – towards the sun and food supplies – is vital for many aquatic microorganisms. Exactly how they are able to differentiate between above and below in often murky waters is ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Dr_toad
May 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Returners
1.5 / 5 (8) May 01, 2014
"Fourteen billion years ago, energy coalesced to form equal quantities of matter and antimatter,"


What repeatable, experimental evidence actually suggests this?

Last time I checked, the whole "universe started with equal parts matter an anti-matter" was essentially a conjecture with no real experimental evidence.

Super-symmetry models don't want there to be unkown particles, except those associated with the conjectured Dark Matter and Dark Energy concepts. I think the term was "techni-quarks" or some such. So I'd say finding even more complicated "particle salad" is bad for those models because it means there is yet another potentially "unobservable, untestable" particle out there hiding, never to be seen, but always to be conjectured by physicists.
Pejico
May 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Mimath224
3 / 5 (2) May 01, 2014
Oh come on lads, don't be so hard on them...I bet there good at Art. I suggest they stay with that. I'd like to see their decsription of a 'hard particle'...or were they playing snooker or the like at the time?
pixeldictator
5 / 5 (2) May 02, 2014
The term should be hadrons. Mesons are hadrons with one quark and one antiquark, baryons are hadrons with three quarks or antiquarks, and what they're talking about is a tetraquark.
shavera
5 / 5 (3) May 02, 2014
Well in this case, the other term floating around is dimeson. Baryons are definitively color-balanced by having one of each color. Mesons are color balanced by having equal and opposite colors present. So from the perspective of the strong force, a tetraquark is a lot more like a meson than a baryon.

Such an argument wouldn't hold for a pentaquark hadron though.