Beyond LHC: Particle physicists explore the potential of more powerful proton colliders

May 05, 2014 by Lori Ann White
Members of the Physics at 100 TeV workshop gather for a photo. Credit: Lori Ann White/SLAC

(Phys.org) —An international group of about 100 physicists gathered last week for the first formal workshop at SLAC to explore the world of high-energy physics beyond CERN's Large Hadron Collider, which is famous for unearthing the Higgs boson – and even beyond the International Linear Collider, a facility that hasn't been built yet. Their focus: a 100 tera-electronvolt (TeV) proton-proton collider about seven times more powerful than the LHC will be when it reaches its maximum energy of 14 TeV in 2015.

Getting Ready for the Future

"It does seem like a crazy thing to hold a like this when the LHC hasn't even hit 14 TeV," said Tim Cohen, a member of the SLAC particle theory group and one of the organizers of the workshop, along with SLAC colleagues Michael Peskin and Jay Wacker and experimentalist Mike Hance from Lawrence Berkeley Lab. "But I think the Snowmass process we went through last summer has the HEP community really looking toward the future." The Snowmass process refers to a lengthy planning and consensus-building effort by the high-energy physics community that culminated in a week-long meeting, during which they set long-term priorities for the field.

Peskin said he was surprised at the amount of interest shown in discussing 100 TeV when five years ago the world record was less than 2 TeV. "We expected an intimate workshop of about 30 people, and we ended up with more than 100 people registered," he said. "But I think the community has begun exploring the physics of 100 TeV colliders as a long-term vision for the field, following the operation of the LHC. We felt that the workshop would be a timely way to assist that process."

Big Questions About High Energies

The big question at the SLAC workshop was "Why?" Why build such a powerful machine? What new insights into fundamental physics might it make possible?

One use for a 100 TeV collider is to more thoroughly explore the Standard Model – the name given to our current best description of matter and energy at its most fundamental levels. Work on fully describing the Higgs boson has just begun, and the possibility exists that the Higgs itself is composite – made up of other, as-yet-unknown particles that could only be found at higher energies. A 100 TeV machine would produce Higgs bosons at 15 times the rate of the 14 TeV LHC, allowing for precise measurements of many of their most important properties.

Also discussed during the workshop were some of the most pressing conundrums in physics today, such as the nature of dark matter and whether supersymmetry – the idea that each fundamental particle has a more massive, not-yet-discovered partner – exists. Neither has been detected at the LHC, but there is theoretical support for their detection with a 100 TeV machine.

The second pressing question was "How?" How can such a massive machine be realized, and how must physicists adapt to take advantage of what it can reveal?

To cover the first "how," speakers discussed several technical advances required to build a 100 TeV machine, such as stronger magnets, more sensitive detectors and better tools for analyzing the deluge of data.

The second "how" is more subtle.

The higher energies of collisions at a 100 TeV machine might reveal new phenomena, but it will also result in known particle interactions – and lots of them – and some of these known interactions and decays could muddy the data at higher energies.

For example, said Peskin, "Classes of events that are easy to recognize at the LHC become confused with other types of events at 100 TeV" – an issue that must be carefully considered in designing the experiments. "The question that we really need to address – and which we began to discuss at the workshop – is whether we need to do physics in a qualitatively different way from what we are doing at the LHC."

"All of these discussions are in their absolute infancy, but I think they're necessary," said Hance. He pointed to the 30-year timescale of the LHC: "It's good to get the people who will build this future collider inspired now."

Explore further: CERN prepares its long-term future

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

CERN prepares its long-term future

Feb 06, 2014

Particle physics takes the long-term view. Originally conceived in the 1980s, the LHC took another 25 years to come into being. This accelerator, which is unlike any other, is just at the start of a programme ...

CERN eyes new giant particle collider

Feb 06, 2014

Europe's physics lab CERN said Thursday it was eyeing plans for a circular particle collider that would be seven times more powerful than the facility which discovered the famous "God particle." ...

LHC Ready for Duty Again

Feb 21, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- For the Christmas holiday, the Large Hadron Collider at CERN was shut down for a break and for a little technical tinkering. But next week, the hope is that the LHC will start up again around ...

Large Hadron Collider to run at 4 TeV per beam in 2012

Feb 14, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- CERN today announced that the Large Hadron Collider will run with a beam energy of 4 TeV this year, 0.5 TeV higher than in 2010 and 2011. This decision was taken by CERN management following ...

Large Hadron Collider 7 TeV experiment on March 30

Mar 23, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- With beams routinely circulating in the Large Hadron Collider at 3.5 TeV, the highest energy yet achieved in a particle accelerator, CERN has set the date for the start of the LHC research ...

Recommended for you

How Paramecium protozoa claw their way to the top

22 hours ago

The ability to swim upwards – towards the sun and food supplies – is vital for many aquatic microorganisms. Exactly how they are able to differentiate between above and below in often murky waters is ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JIMBO
not rated yet May 05, 2014
We all know what's driving this absurdity: SUSY, & her cult of followers who've been looking in futility for the past 1/4 century & wish to go on for Another. Theorists addicted to SUSY have dedicated decades of their careers, & cannot go cold turkey, else admit failure. They continue to dangle this carrot in front of the experimentalists, to enlist their numbers in the crusade as well.
However, the theorists should reflect on the recent BICEP discovery, crowning `inflation' as the proper cosmology. Its closest competitor, the Cyclic universe, is built from M-theory, the overarching theory of strings, which requires SUSY's existence for consistency. Thus the inability of the Cyclic model to predict the primordial grav waves observed by BICEP, spells Doom for SUSY as well. The ultimate accelerator, the BigBang, has delivered the eulogy for SUSY, but the cult members are obsessed, & cannot hear Nature speaking to them.
JIMBO
not rated yet May 05, 2014
We all know what's driving this absurdity: SUSY, & her cult of followers who've been looking in futility for the past 1/4 century & wish to go on for Another. Theorists addicted to SUSY have dedicated decades of their careers, & cannot go cold turkey, else admit failure. They continue to dangle this carrot in front of the experimentalists, to enlist their numbers in the crusade as well.
However, the theorists should reflect on the recent BICEP discovery, crowning `inflation' as the proper cosmology. Its closest competitor, the Cyclic universe, is built from M-theory, the overarching theory of strings, which requires SUSY's existence for consistency. Thus the inability of the Cyclic model to predict the primordial grav waves observed by BICEP, spells Doom for SUSY as well. The ultimate accelerator, the BigBang, has delivered the eulogy for SUSY, but the cult members are obsessed, & cannot hear Nature speaking to them.
JIMBO
not rated yet May 05, 2014
Inadvertent 2nd entry deleted