Fine-tuning cloud models for improved climate predictions

May 6, 2014
Fine-tuning cloud models for improved climate predictions

Arctic clouds are widespread and play an important role in climate, but different models have produced widely varying predictions about the properties of these clouds. This study analyzes simulations of Arctic clouds by 11 different models and identifies the key factor responsible for the variable predictions.

The findings highlight the important role of ice distribution in determining cloud evolution and suggest that adjustments of this parameter in climate models will reduce variability and improve accuracy. By enabling scientists to develop a better understanding of how form and evolve, this study will improve climate predictions.

Mixed-phase clouds occur at below-freezing temperatures and consist of both cloud droplets and ice crystals. Because the processes that regulate the formation and evolution of these clouds are not well understood, models have produced widely varying predictions about the clouds' properties. To identify sources of this variability, researchers from the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and 10 other institutions performed simulations of mixed-phase Arctic clouds by 11 different models using computing resources such as the Chinook supercomputer in the Molecular Science Computing Facility at EMSL, the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, a DOE national scientific user facility.

The researchers constrained the properties of individual ice particles, spatial resolution, and several other parameters across the models to isolate differences due to physics. The different models produced highly variable predictions mainly because they assumed different ice particle size distributions. Many models assumed by default that size distributions were very broad and contained many large particles. The new findings suggest that this unrealistic assumption can lead to erroneous predictions about key cloud properties, such as the balance between droplets and ice crystals as well as cloud longevity. Therefore, it will be important to adjust the ice particle size distribution parameter in to reduce variability in the predictions. The findings also underscore the need for a better understanding of the distributions of ice particle sizes that occur in nature.

Explore further: Most complete dataset ever collected helps scientists understand aerosols' impacts on clouds

More information: Ovchinnikov, M., et al. "Intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of Arctic mixed-phase clouds: Importance of ice size distribution assumptions." J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 6, (2014). [DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000282].

Related Stories

Ice heating up cold clouds

September 21, 2011

In the Arctic, competition within clouds is hot. The small amount of heat released when water vapor condenses on ice crystals in Arctic clouds, which contain both water and ice, determines the cloud's survival, according ...

Declining sea ice to lead to cloudier Arctic: study

March 31, 2012

Arctic sea ice has been declining over the past several decades as global climate has warmed. In fact, sea ice has declined more quickly than many models predicted, indicating that climate models may not be correctly representing ...

Pollution yields longer-lasting storm clouds

November 26, 2013

( —A new study reveals how pollution causes thunderstorms to leave behind larger, deeper, longer lasting clouds. Appearing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences November 26, the results solve a ...

Recommended for you

Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?

November 26, 2015

More than 190 countries are meeting in Paris next week to create a durable framework for addressing climate change and to implement a process to reduce greenhouse gases over time. A key part of this agreement would be the ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) May 07, 2014
In the long term this type of collaboration and analysis of climate models will produce more consistent results. Politically, consistency is more important than accuracy. Mixed messages to the populace is partially responsible for climate change denial.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.