Energy-subsidy reform can be achieved with proper preparation, outside pressure

May 05, 2014
Energy-subsidy reform can be achieved with proper preparation, outside pressure

Reform of energy subsidies in oil-exporting countries can reduce carbon emissions and add years to oil exports, according to a new paper from Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy.

"Navigating the Perils of Energy-Subsidy Reform in Exporting Countries" was authored by Jim Krane, the Wallace S. Wilson Fellow for Energy Studies at the Baker Institute, who specializes in energy geopolitics. The paper reviews the record of energy-subsidy reforms and argues that big exporters should reduce energy demand by raising prices, and that this can be done without undermining legitimacy of governments that depend on for political support.

"Removing state subsidies on energy is one of the most politically dangerous acts there is," Krane said. "No government in the world wants to antagonize motorists or raise electricity prices. But previous experience shows that with proper preparation, subsidies can be rolled back without undermining government legitimacy, even in autocracies that use these discounts to preserve popular support."

Whether sold as bulk crude oil and natural gas or as retail electricity, gasoline or diesel, the major exporters of OPEC, Russia and others harbor some of the lowest domestic energy prices in the world. These fossil-fuel subsidies have allowed these countries to distribute resource revenue, bolstering legitimacy for governments, many of which are not democratically elected, Krane said.

"However, subsidy benefits are dwarfed by the harmful consequences of encouraging uneconomic use of energy," Krane said. "These effects include wasted resources, foregone revenue and outsized emissions of carbon dioxide as well as local pollutants such as sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides. Now, with consumption posing a threat to long-term exports, governments face a heightened need to raise prices that have come to be viewed as entitlements."

Subsidy reform by centralized governments like those in most OPEC countries is even more difficult, since concentration of authority also concentrates the accountability of the head of state. Blame is difficult to evade – unless the leadership can blame outside pressure.

"A vociferous international outcry or pressure from a foreign government or non-governmental organization can provide political cover for governments to enact unpopular measures," he said. "Lobbying by external pressure groups is useful in this sense."

Perhaps the biggest risk implied by reforms of subsidies and social contracts is the possibility of unrest and even the overthrow of governments, Krane said.

Despite the risk, energy subsidies are not untouchable. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), all but five of 28 substantial attempts to dismantle subsidies over the past two decades met with some success. The list of reformers includes energy exporters. Indonesia, for example, after failed attempts in 1997 and 2003, successfully raised fuel prices in 2005 and 2008.

Krane said the most encouraging example of reform efforts is that of Iran, the first country in the world to replace major subsidies with a universal cash transfer program for households. Iran's 2010 reform was welcomed by the IMF and, at least initially, by the Iranian public, while halving the world's largest energy-subsidy burden, valued at around $100 billion or a quarter of the 2010 gross domestic product.

Done properly, ending subsidies can add years to the longevity of exports, while keeping global markets supplied and reducing both local pollution and emissions, Krane said. Mismanaged, eliminating "entitlements" can undermine legitimacy and trigger unrest. "In the Middle East, where pan-Arab revolts have toppled four governments and left a fifth in civil war, caution remains acute," he said.

Keeping prices low offers a short-term benefit, but in the longer run, giveaways of chief export commodities undermines exports, which invites greater economic and political trouble. Oil exporting regimes depend on export revenues to maintain control.

"Policymakers in exporting states understand that reforming subsidies is their best strategy for preserving political power, since export revenues are a key resource for political stability," Krane concluded. "Thus, constructive external criticism can provide regimes with persuasive tools for swaying public opinion of the need for higher prices and reduced demand."

Explore further: Renewable energy won't fix Abu Dhabi's consumption problem, research finds

More information: Paper: bakerinstitute.org/research/na… exporting-countries/

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Farm subsidies rising in world's biggest economies

Sep 18, 2013

Farm subsidies in the world's biggest economies rose in 2012, the OECD said, reversing a long-term trend as governments poured more funding into agriculture despite strained budgets and high food prices.

Recommended for you

Modi wields broom in new 'Clean India' push

2 hours ago

Prime Minister Narendra Modi wielded a broom in a New Delhi slum on Thursday as he pledged to sweep away India's reputation for poor public hygiene and rudimentary sanitation.

Engineering new vehicle powertrains

19 hours ago

Car engines – whether driven by gasoline, diesel, or electricity – waste an abundance of energy. Researchers are working on ways to stem this wastefulness. Ultramodern test facilities are helping them ...

First self-contained step dimming LED tube

Sep 30, 2014

Samsung Electronics today introduced the industry's first AC Direct step-dimming LED linear replacement for T8 and T12 fluorescent tubes at the National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) Convention ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Cliff Claven
3 / 5 (2) May 05, 2014
The whole premise of this article and argument are flawed. When politicians and activists with certain agendas like to claim that fossil fuels are subsidized by various governments around the world, they are quite literally reversing the facts. It is rent from fossil fuel sales that funds the governments of petro-states, and simply smart politics that these governments should charge foreigners a higher price than their own citizens for this product. Even in the US, fossil fuels return to the US Treasury 2,000% of the "subsidies" they collect as tax breaks and direct assistance. But, by no means is the oil and gas industry of the USA, Saudi Arabia or Russia a drag on their economy -- it is a cash cow.