How does snow affect the amount of water in rivers?

May 18, 2014
Glaciers along the Continental Divide, Alberta, May 2007. Glacier- and snow-fed systems provide the backbone of water supply not only in Western Canada but also in many other regions in the world. Credit: Markus Hrachowitz

New research has shown for the first time that the amount of water flowing through rivers in snow-affected regions depends significantly on how much of the precipitation falls as snowfall. This means in a warming climate, if less of the precipitation falls as snow, rivers will discharge less water than they currently do.

The study by PhD student Wouter Berghuijs and Dr Ross Woods, Senior Lecturer in Water and Environmental Engineering in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Bristol together with a colleague from Delft University of Technology is published online in Nature Climate Change.

The researchers, using historical data from several hundred located across the United States, investigated the effect of on the amount of water that rivers discharge.

How river flow is generated in snowy areas is poorly understood due to the difficulty in getting appropriate measurements. Previous studies have mostly focused on the role of snowfall for the within-year distribution of streamflow - how much water is there in the river during a particular period of the year - and assumed that there was no important effect of snow on the average streamflow. This study is the first to focus on the role of snow for how much water is on average available in rivers.

With data from 420 catchments located throughout the United States the researchers show that snowiness is an important factor for the average .

Global warming is very likely to reduce the amount of snow significantly in snow-affected catchments, even if temperatures rise only two degrees Celsius. The new research suggests that the amount of water in rivers will be reduced as a result of the decrease in snow.

Headwaters of Tsitika River watershed on Northern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, December 2005. Temperature increases will affect the hydrological system in particular in rain/snow transition zones. Credit: Markus Hrachowitz

The authors of the study said: "With more than one-sixth of the Earth's population depending on meltwater for their water supply, and ecosystems that can be sensitive to streamflow alterations, the socio-economic consequences of a reduction in streamflow can be substantial.

"Our finding is particularly relevant to regions where societally important functions, such ecosystem stability, hydropower, irrigation, and industrial or domestic water supply are derived from snowmelt."

Given this importance of streamflow for society, the researchers propose that further studies are required to respond to the consequences of a temperature-induced shift from snow to rain.

Explore further: River ice reveals new twist on Arctic melt

More information: A precipitation shift from snow towards rain leads to a decrease in streamflow, W. R. Berghuijs, R. A.Woods and M. Hrachowitz, Nature Climate Change, Vol 4, June 2014. dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2246

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

River ice reveals new twist on Arctic melt

Apr 02, 2014

A new study led by Lance Lesack, a Simon Fraser University geographer and Faculty of Environment professor, has discovered unexpected climate-driven changes in the mighty Mackenzie River's ice breakup. This ...

Recommended for you

Huge waves measured for first time in Arctic Ocean

17 hours ago

As the climate warms and sea ice retreats, the North is changing. An ice-covered expanse now has a season of increasingly open water which is predicted to extend across the whole Arctic Ocean before the middle ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

LEVI506
3.7 / 5 (3) May 18, 2014
Amazing!!!! You mean the more snow, the more water in the river? WOW who could have predicted that.
PinkElephant
3.7 / 5 (3) May 18, 2014
@LEVI506,

Try to read past the headline before you pour forth with sarcasm.

The issue addressed above is not total precipitation, but the ratio of precipitation falling as rain vs. snow.

While it's true that more snow means more water in the river, replacing some of that snow with rain apparently gives you less water in the river, when the flow is averaged over the year.