Terrorism works, but only when governments allow it to

Apr 28, 2014
Terrorism does work, but only when governments respond to it in a violent fashion and play into the terrorists' strategy, argues Michigan State University's Jakana Thomas. Credit: Michigan State University

Terrorism can be a successful strategy for rebel groups during civil war, but only when governments allow it to work, finds a new study by a Michigan State University political scientist.

Responding to acts of terrorism with violence is more likely to prolong the conflict. However, if governments negotiate or use sound counterterrorism efforts, they stand a better chance of bringing about a peaceful resolution, said Jakana Thomas, assistant professor of .

Her study appears online in the American Journal of Political Science.

"Terrorism can work, but only if a government allows it to," Thomas said. "When governments attempt to quash the terrorists and kill civilians in the process – as so often happens – their response backfires and feeds into the terrorists' strategy."

Thomas analyzed civil conflict from 1989 to 2010 in Africa, which has seen a drastic rise in terrorism. Some 45 of the 106 African rebel groups in the study carried out . Rebels practicing terrorism in Somalia, Kenya, Libya and other African countries have threatened regional stability and posed security threats globally.

"That Western nations, including the United States and France, have begun devoting resources to support counterterrorism in Africa underscores its significance," Thomas said.

The findings are relevant globally. When Thomas compared terrorism in Africa with the rest of the world she found the types of attacks (such as bombings, armed assaults and assassinations) and the targets of the attacks (such as governments, businesses and civilians) were nearly identical.

Her study is one of the first to examine terrorism in the context of civil war. Previous research on the effectiveness of terrorism has been inconclusive.

Thomas refutes the popular adage that governments do not negotiate with terrorists. According to the study, rebel groups employing a greater number of terror attacks were much more likely to participate in negotiations and gain more concessions from the ruling party in the months following the conflict.

"Governments should consider negotiating with disaffected people in the country. That doesn't necessarily have to be the groups using terrorism; it can be other groups, such as civil groups operating on behalf of these armed rebels," Thomas said.

"I'm not suggesting we should negotiate with Al-Qaeda," she added. "This is in the context of with routine violence, when negotiating with these domestic rebel groups may be the only way forward."

Another way governments might deal with the problem is by finding ways of ending civil wars once they start. As much as is a problem, Thomas said, a government refusing to seek peaceful settlements is also a problem.

Explore further: Expiration of terrorism risk insurance act could hurt national security, study finds

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Why rebel groups attack civilians

May 29, 2008

In civil war, rebel groups often target civilians despite the fact that their actual target is the government and that they are often dependent on the support of the civilian groups they attack. This may seem illogical, but ...

What makes solo terrorists tick?

Dec 15, 2011

The double terrorist attack in Norway last July, which claimed 77 lives, has moved violent acts committed by single individuals up the political, media and now research agendas. Known as "lone wolf terrorism," these acts ...

With friends like these, who needs democracy?

Feb 20, 2014

From Ethiopia to Nicaragua, countries that go through civil war are much less likely to become democratic if the winning side gets help from rival nations, a Michigan State University political scientist ...

How politically effective is terrorism?

Sep 16, 2013

Why do some militant groups continue to use terrorism when it's politically ineffective, even counterproductive? The answer lies in their leadership deficits, according to Max Abrahms, a terrorism theorist and newly appointed ...

Recommended for you

Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

8 hours ago

When asked who is going to win an election, people tend to predict their own candidate will come out on top. When that doesn't happen, according to a new study from the University of Georgia, these "surprised losers" often ...

Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

Jul 23, 2014

(AP)—Potentially tens of thousands of students awarded a Pell Grant or other need-based federal aid for the coming school year could find it taken away because of a mistake in filling out the form.

Perthites wanted for study on the Aussie lingo

Jul 23, 2014

We all know that Australians speak English differently from the way it's spoken in the UK or the US, and many of us are aware that Perth people have a slightly different version of the language from, say, Melbournians - but ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

julianpenrod
2.3 / 5 (3) Apr 28, 2014
Unfortunately, the image of "terrorism" sold by "government" is straight out of Central Casting, specifically modeled for political effect. Carefully ignored are such things as that maybe the "terrorists" are right, in the sense of being genuinely aggrieved individuals who saw the power structure treat them only with contempt. In that way, "government" allowing "terrorism" to work includes those in power being allowed to continue raping the little guy! The image Washington sells is of people who woke up one morning "wanting only to kill Americans". The same Washington Charles Krauthammer praises for installing dictators that protect only "American interests". And, if the "terrorists" are sided with by the people, they don't view themselves as dying in attacks as so heinous, any more than soldiers are viewed as dying in a war. Since it seems the West hides CIA/Mossad/MI-5 operations in civilian areas, using people as "human shields", the locals may even welcome attacks.
kochevnik
2.3 / 5 (3) Apr 28, 2014
USA sponsored terrorists mercenaries and nazis puppet government are working efficiently in Ukraine. Unfortunately corporatist police state USA has not invented 1,000,000 SPF sunblock against 65 megaton hydrogen bomb, or way to feed their population when bankster debt-driven economy implodes like aluminum can after FED forced gold to such low prices the Chinese bought it all

http://www.market...088.html
COCO
not rated yet Apr 29, 2014
"negotiate with Al-Qaeda'"? - indicates a lack of real research - Al CIADA has been a core player - hard to conclude much from such sophomoric sophistry. Proof is in the pudding eh? - - Are there not nation-states alive today whose existence came from freedom fighting/terrorism?