US Senate leader open to Keystone pipeline vote

Apr 30, 2014
A protester blocks traffic on April 25, 2014 to protest the Keystone XL pipeline in Washington, DC

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Tuesday he would consider legislation forcing construction of a controversial US-to-Canada oil pipeline, setting up a possible end run around the Obama administration after the project's latest delay.

"I'm open to anything that will move energy efficiency," Reid told reporters when asked about negotiations over bringing the Keystone XL Pipeline to a vote.

The top Democrat's potential acquiescence on the issue is crucial because as majority leader he controls the chamber's schedule.

He said the effort was originally going to be a non-binding resolution.

But after the State Department extended the Keystone review process until likely beyond mid-term congressional elections in November, lawmakers shifted toward a measure that carries the power of law.

"Now they say that they want an up or down (vote) on a piece of legislation," Reid said.

The pipeline, first proposed in 2008, is slated to cross US borders bringing oil from the tar sands of Alberta to refineries in the US state of Nebraska and then farther south to Texas.

Republicans have long argued the project would create tens of thousands of jobs. Democrats have countered it carries too many environmental risks.

Reid signalled talks had made progress in the past 24 hours, when he met with Republican senators as well as Democrat Mary Landrieu who supports the project and has voiced opposition to the White House foot-dragging on Keystone.

The effort would need 60 votes in the 100-seat chamber to overcome blocking tactics by Democrats, many of whom are unlikely to buck President Barack Obama's opposition to Keystone.

Some Democrats in Keystone-affected states, or who like Landrieu face tough re-election fights in November in Republican-leaning states, back the effort.

"I think there's probably 15 or more Democrats" who back the pipeline, bringing the total to more than 60 supporters, Senate Democrat Mark Begich of Alaska told AFP.

Should Obama veto the measure, the Senate would need a two-thirds majority, or 67 votes, to override the president.

"A lot of us have argued, put it up, let's see where it falls and then go from there," Begich said.

The Republican-led House of Representatives has passed pro-Keystone bills by wide margins.

Senate Republican John Thune said he hoped the measure could be introduced as an amendment to a broader Senate energy bill up for debate next week.

Explore further: US delays decision on Keystone pipeline project

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US delays decision on Keystone pipeline project

Apr 18, 2014

The United States announced Friday a fresh delay on a final decision regarding a controversial Canada to US oil pipeline, saying more time was needed to carry out a review.

US House sends message on Keystone pipeline

May 23, 2013

US lawmakers agreed to a bill that would speed construction of a Canada-US oil pipeline and circumvent the need for President Barack Obama's approval for the $5 billion project.

US judge blocks Keystone pipeline route in Nebraska

Feb 19, 2014

The controversial Keystone XL pipeline met with another hurdle Wednesday when a Nebraska judge ruled that a state law granting approval to a proposed route was unconstitutional, court records showed.

House, Senate leaders agree on Medicare fees

Mar 26, 2014

House Speaker John Boehner says he and top Senate Democrat Harry Reid have reached an agreement on legislation to forestall a looming 24 percent cut in Medicare payments to doctors.

Recommended for you

Conservationists sue over federal coal program

9 hours ago

Conservation groups have sued the government to force federal officials to undertake the first broad environmental review of the government's coal-leasing program in decades.

Owner of ship that damaged reef to pay $840,000

12 hours ago

The federal government and the state of Hawaii have reached an agreement for damages from the owner of a cargo ship that harmed more than 100,000 coral colonies several years ago when it ran aground off Oahu.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

zaxxon451
5 / 5 (1) Apr 30, 2014
Of course it will be built. The oligarchs own this place and are willing to burn this planet to the ground to feed their gluttony for money/power.

"When all the trees have been cut down,
when all the animals have been hunted,
when all the waters are polluted,
when all the air is unsafe to breathe,
only then will you discover you cannot eat money."
~ Cree Prophecy ~

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.