Sell-side analysts lean towards high valuation companies for comparison, study shows

Apr 30, 2014
Ole-Kristian Hope is the Deloitte Professor of Accounting and the PhD Coordinator in Accounting at the Rotman School of Management. He has broad research interests in financial disclosure, financial reporting quality, corporate governance, analysts, valuation, auditing, private firms, corporate finance, and international business issues. He has published extensively in The Accounting Review, Journal of Accounting Research, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Contemporary Accounting Research, Review of Accounting Studies, and several other journals including JIBS, JAPP, JBFA, JAAF, AH, etc. Credit: Rotman School

Sell-side analysts lean towards high valuation companies for comparison, Rotman study shows.

Toronto – Brokerage-based have a tendency to benchmark companies they are researching against others in the same category whose stock is already expensively-priced, shows a study from the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management.

The result is that the company being researched may look undervalued and a good buy compared to the high valuation company. The finding provides some support for the idea that sell-side analysts choose "peer" companies strategically, in order to make their recommendations seem more credible.

Nevertheless, most analysts use reasonable criteria for picking peer companies, says one of the study's researchers.

"We believe these analysts fulfil an important function in the market. That doesn't mean they're perfect," said Prof. Ole-Kristian Hope, Deloitte Professor of Accounting at the Rotman School. Prof. Hope co-wrote the study with Gus De Franco, an associate professor of at the Rotman School and Stephannie Larocque, a Rotman PhD graduate who is now an assistant professor of accounting at the University of Notre Dame.

The study also found that analysts show an even greater tendency to choose high valuation peer firms when their own brokerages have investment-banking affiliations with the companies they are researching.

The effect is less evident among analysts with an established reputation for skilled analyses.

Previous research has shown that reports by sell-side analysts tend to be optimistic. But this is the first large-scale academic study to examine what goes into those reports and how sell-side analysts decide which peer companies to use for their comparisons.

The study is forthcoming in the Review of Accounting Studies.

Explore further: Performance measures for CEOs vary greatly, study finds

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Religion is good for business, study shows

Dec 20, 2013

Those looking for honest companies to invest in might want to check out businesses based in more religious communities, suggests a new paper from the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management.

Performance measures for CEOs vary greatly, study finds

Apr 16, 2014

As companies file their annual proxy statements with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this spring, a new study by Rice University and Cornell University shows just how S&P 500 companies have ...

Recommended for you

Ancient clay seals may shed light on biblical era

Dec 20, 2014

Impressions from ancient clay seals found at a small site in Israel east of Gaza are signs of government in an area thought to be entirely rural during the 10th century B.C., says Mississippi State University archaeologist ...

Digging up the 'Spanish Vikings'

Dec 19, 2014

The fearsome reputation of the Vikings has made them the subject of countless exhibitions, books and films - however, surprisingly little is known about their more southerly exploits in Spain.

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.