Negev desert solar field uses water-free robotic cleaning system

Apr 01, 2014 by Nancy Owano weblog

(Phys.org) —At large solar plants, keeping surfaces of solar panels free from dust and sand is not just a matter of good housekeeping but of whether or not the plants can really make a difference to the communities they want to serve. In other words, keeping the panels clean especially in very dry areas may be a matter of solar plant effectiveness or ineffectiveness. Solar plant panels in deserts collect large quantities of dust. Recently, a solar park in Israel was provided with an answer to the problem.

The 20-acre Ketura Sun Solar Park in the Negev Desert (located in the hot southern stretch, which suffers from sandstorms and little rain) was introduced to a robotic cleaning process from an Israel-based company, Ecoppia. No water is needed for the cleanups. Instead, each night (cleaning typically takes place during the early hours of dark) 100 centrally controlled E4 robots, as they are called, go to work on the panels using microfibers and controlled air flow to push dirt off panels. The robots use gravitation to move the dust particles downwards and off the panels. They move along a rigid aluminum frame with wheels coated with polyurethane; there is no load on the ' surface.

Ecoppia designed the system to be water-free and energy-efficient. When not cleaning, the robots are locked to a docking station outside of the solar PV row. While docking, robot batteries are charged through their solar panel. The fleet can be remotely managed from a dashboard or mobile app.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

Before the latest robotic cleaning process, Ketura Sun's solar panels were only cleaned about nine times a year, in consideration of the expense involved in a labor-intensive, water-based cleaning process. Manual panel cleaning could take up to five days. As a result operations worked suboptimally and in the interim between cleaning cycles the park suffered electricity production degradation due to "soiling," the term used to describe the accumulation of dirt and dust on photovoltaic solar panel surfaces.

Ecoppia, founded in 2013, is in the business of photovoltaic solar panel cleaning solutions The Ketura Sun solar park is jointly owned by Siemens AG and solar energy pioneer Arava Power. Founded in 2006, Arava Power has seven solar parks in production or development across the Negev, with a total production capacity of 80 MW. In 2009, Siemens AG acquired a 40 percent stake in Arava Power.

The park's robot cleaning crew is yet another marker of interest by the solar industry in improved techniques for keeping panels clean and efficient. Last November, a Tokyo-based company, Sinfonia Technology, announced it developed a robot with camera and sensors that can move autonomously and clean solar panels at large-scale solar power plants. Its robot had another approach, with equipment including scrub brush, wiper and detergent; and sprinkling water stored in its tank.

Also in November, US-based SunPower announced the acquisition of Greenbotics, a company with panel cleaning products for large-scale .

Explore further: Robot with brush, water, wiper tackles solar panel cleaning

More information: www.ecoppia.com/

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Power boosting self-cleaning solar panels

Nov 22, 2013

High-power, self-cleaning solar panels might be coming soon to a roof near you. There are two obvious problems with photovoltaic cells, solar panels. First, they are very shiny and so a lot of the incident sunlight is simply ...

Recommended for you

Cheaper silicon means cheaper solar cells

Oct 22, 2014

Researchers at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology have pioneered a new approach to manufacturing solar cells that requires less silicon and can accommodate silicon with more impurities than ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (3) Apr 01, 2014
That's pretty neat. Water usage has always bothered me with these cleaning systems. I would have gone for an ultrasonic system, myself - as it would have no microfiber parts that eventually wear out (though at the type of usage these are seeing they probably last quite a long time, so that would only be a very minor advantage...and may even be more costly due to higher energy needs.)
Scottingham
4 / 5 (2) Apr 01, 2014
An ultrasonic application may cause problems with the solar panel itself, loosening the junctures etc.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (2) Apr 01, 2014
An ultrasonic application may cause problems with the solar panel itself, loosening the junctures etc.
A maintenance issue that in the long run, will likely be cheaper to deal with then the cost of using water for the cleaning.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Apr 01, 2014
An ultrasonic application may cause problems with the solar panel itself, loosening the junctures etc.

There's not much in the way of junctures at the glass panel front. It's pretty much soldiered shut. And ultrasonics don't penetrate well into glass.

You see these ultrasonic cleansing apparatus sometimes at opticians. They work pretty well without water if the dirt is non-grimey.
Sonhouse
2 / 5 (1) Apr 01, 2014
My only problem would be long term: What damage do the brushes themselves cause, they have to be scratching the surface and it would seem to me after a certain number of cleanings the light would start to be diffused a bit by scratches if there were a lot of them from the cleaning process, water or no.

Looking at the Mars rovers, you can see obvious dust build up, it seemed to me some kind of compressed air bottle on a movable arm would be great for that purpose, wouldn't weigh much but it would certainly get the PV's back to snuff quite a number of times before air would run out of the canister. It would only take a few shots of air to clean out those small PV cells on the rovers.
peter_trypsteen
not rated yet Apr 01, 2014
@Sonhouse
Even better, add a compressor that refills the air bottle.
Or use a dust blower arm instead with built-in compressor.