Little-studied man-made gases have big warming potential

Apr 07, 2014
Little-studied man-made gases have big warming potential

(Phys.org) —The total warming impact of 25 major synthetic greenhouse gases has been examined by an international team, led by researchers from the University of Bristol.

The study estimates that, without additional limits on synthetic use, the resulting increase in warming could outweigh the climate benefits gained thus far from phasing down chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).

CFCs—commonly used in refrigerators and air conditioners—garnered public attention for their role in creating a hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica. As these chemicals were phased-down thanks to international agreements limiting their use, they were replaced by other synthesized gases that can still be harmful to the and are that contribute to climate change. Despite this, synthetic greenhouse gases (SGHGs) beyond the CFCs have received relatively little attention from the research community—until now.

The study, led by Dr Matthew Rigby of Bristol's School of Chemistry, analysed observed atmospheric levels of SGHGs from 1978 to 2012, and then used these measurements to predict the impact these gases could have on through 2050.

In response to the phase-down of CFCs through the 1987 Montreal Protocol, the researchers discovered that the use of other synthetic gases as refrigerants—such as hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)—has risen. HFCs had been limited in the now-defunct 1997 Kyoto Protocol, but there is currently no agreement restricting their use. So, using HFCs as a test case, the researchers examined the effect of phasing down HFCs by amending the Montreal Protocol to include these gases.

Dr Rigby said: "We could avoid adding the equivalent of up to another three years of into the atmosphere if these gases were being phased down."

HFCs are particularly strong greenhouse gases, so even relatively small levels in the atmosphere can contribute to warming.

"Per tonne of emissions, HFCs are much more potent greenhouse gases than carbon dioxide, and are very good at trapping the radiation that heats the Earth," Dr Rigby said.

While HFCs are currently not a major driver of climate change compared to or even other SGHGs, the researchers point out that if unabated they may contribute significantly to future warming.

The study used measurements of SGHG levels from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE), a global observing system developed by Professor Ronald Prinn of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and colleagues, and sponsored by NASA and other agencies.

Professor Prinn, co-director of the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change and a co-author of the report said: "Addressing HFCs, and other SGHGs, now will ensure that they don't contribute significantly to warming in the future."

Meanwhile, the researchers note that due to extensive use, CFCs will continue to warm the planet for years to come.

"CFCs have contributed the most among the synthetic greenhouse gases to warming. Their use peaked and levels are now declining, but these gases will remain in the atmosphere for many years. This is likely the trend we will see with most SGHG gases, so it is important that we address these gases now before they do more severe damage," said Professor Prinn.

Explore further: Study reveals four new man-made gases in the atmosphere

More information: Rigby, M., et al. (2014), "Recent and future trends in synthetic greenhouse gas radiative forcing," Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, DOI: 10.1002/2013GL059099

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Call to cut 'super greenhouse gases'

Jun 12, 2013

Phasing out "super greenhouse gases," which mass emitters China and the United States have agreed to restrict, could curb global warming by as much as half a degree Celsius by 2050, a report said Wednesday.

US, China agree to end 'super greenhouse gases'

Jun 08, 2013

China agreed Saturday with the United States to scale back production of "super greenhouse gases" used in refrigerators and air conditioners in a joint bid to fight climate change.

Recommended for you

Rio's Olympic golf course in legal bunker

11 hours ago

The return of golf to the Olympics after what will be 112 years by the time Rio hosts South America's first Games in 2016 comes amid accusations environmental laws were got round to build the facility in ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

MR166
1.8 / 5 (5) Apr 07, 2014
Excuse me if I am a little skeptical about the implementation of the regulations. Here in the US they banned R-12. If you want to dispose of an appliance that uses R-12 there a disposal fee of about $25. They are supposed to collect the gas so that it does not get into the atmosphere.

How this works in practice:

Much of the time the appliance is being discarded because of a leak, ie the R-12 has already escaped. Let's say this is not the case and a company comes and collects the refrigerant. THEY DO NOT DESTROY THE GAS. The collect it and resell it to another user that has equipment that needs a recharge. Thus the gas gets into the atmosphere anyway and you are taxed , the extra $25 disposal fee, for absolutely no environmental gain.

NameIsNotNick
5 / 5 (5) Apr 07, 2014
Excuse me if I am a little skeptical

Eventually it will all leak into the atmosphere but under the old system they would be manufacturing new CFC instead of recycling the old stuff until it's all lost.
MR166
1.8 / 5 (5) Apr 07, 2014
"Eventually it will all leak into the atmosphere but under the old system they would be manufacturing new CFC instead of recycling the old stuff until it's all lost."

Production of R-12 has been banned for many years so nothing is being gained there. Why should I have to pay for the collection of something that will be sold at a huge profit. The cost of collection should be passed on to the end user. I could see if the R-12 was being destroyed and turned into a non-harmful substance, that should be a cost to me.
ScooterG
2.3 / 5 (6) Apr 07, 2014
I'd bet $100 that Dr Matthew Rigby's car, home, and office are all CFC-cooled.