India 'seeks to avert summons for Samsung boss': reports

Apr 04, 2014
Lee Kun-Hee (centre), former Samsung Group chairman, leaves after his trial at the Seoul High Court in Seoul on August 14, 2009

India's government is scrambling to prevent the boss of South Korea's Samsung Electronics from being forced to appear in an Indian court on criminal charges over a $1.4-million payment dispute, reports said Friday.

The Supreme Court ordered Lee Kun-Hee, South Korea's richest man, to appear in a local court within six weeks to answer fraud and other stemming from the dispute or face arrest if he steps onto Indian soil.

New Delhi-based JCE Consultancy alleges Samsung "cheated" the Indian company out of $1.4 million by failing to pay a bill dating from a 2001-02 transaction and names Lee as among the accused.

The case has been dragging through India's notoriously slow legal system since it was initially filed in 2005.

The Indian government fears the legal case against Samsung could aggravate bilateral commercial ties already strained by delays involving a giant South Korean steel project in India.

"It (the situation) is very unfortunate in our view. Samsung is a major player in India and we want them to continue to expand and invest in the country," Amitabh Kant, secretary in India's industrial policy department, told the Economic Times newspaper.

The external affairs and commerce ministries are discussing ways to resolve the matter amicably by approaching the Supreme Court with alternative options, the media reports said, quoting senior government officials.

A customer tries out a Samsung Galaxy S5 smartphone at a mobile phone shop in Seoul on March 27, 2014

"The Supreme Court order may have an adverse impact on India's manufacturing and investment climate. We will explore how best we can ensure that India's investment climate is not affected," Kant added said.

The government fears the summons to Lee, who has an estimated net worth of $11.2 billion, could prove another blow to South Korean giant Posco's steel project in the impoverished eastern state of Orissa, the reports said.

The $12-billion Posco project—the biggest foreign investment in India—has become emblematic of difficulties facing overseas companies in starting up businesses in India.

The project has yet to start work since being announced nine years ago, after being dogged by environmental, regulatory and land acquisition issues.

The Business Standard newspaper quoted a senior unnamed Indian government official as saying Seoul has "threatened to stop all investments coming into India".

Lee Kun-Hee (centre), former Samsung Group chairman, leaves after his trial at the Seoul High Court in Seoul on August 14, 2009

Samsung said in a statement Wednesday that Lee had no connection with the case, which the company said involved a "multi-million dollar fraud scheme" perpetrated against a Dubai subsidiary.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court made no comment on the merits of the case.

Indian courts have a history of summoning top executives who are deemed responsible for alleged offences because of their seniority in their firms.

Explore further: Samsung boss ordered to appear before Indian court

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Brother of Samsung chief loses inheritance appeal

Feb 06, 2014

The elder brother of South Korea's richest man, Samsung Electronics chairman Lee Kun-Hee, lost his court appeal Thursday for an $850 million share of his sibling's inherited wealth.

India court bails Satyam fraud accused

Nov 04, 2011

India's Supreme Court on Friday granted bail to the former chairman of Indian outsourcing giant Satyam, B. Ramalinga Raju, who is accused of one of the country's biggest corporate frauds.

Vodafone asks India court to halt spectrum auction

Feb 20, 2013

Vodafone has petitioned an Indian court to stop the government from auctioning off rights to the cellphone spectrum it now uses for 18.7 million customers in three cities, the company said Wednesday.

India court frees Nokia plant for Microsoft sale

Dec 12, 2013

An Indian court Thursday released a major plant owned by Nokia seized over a multi-billion-dollar tax row, paving the way for the Finnish firm to include the factory in the sale of its mobile business to ...

Recommended for you

Netflix sues Yahoo CIO for alleged kickbacks

10 hours ago

Netflix is suing a former company vice president who is now chief information officer at Yahoo, accusing him of receiving money from vendors he hired to work with the video streaming company.

BlackBerry courts iPhone users with cash

Nov 25, 2014

Canadian smartphone maker BlackBerry is wooing Apple customers with a cash offer for trade-ins of iPhones for its new square-screened, keyboard-equipped Passport.

HP earnings show continued struggle

Nov 25, 2014

Venerable tech giant Hewlett-Packard has been struggling for three years to turn its business around. Its latest earnings show it still has more work ahead.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

PhyOrgSux
not rated yet Apr 04, 2014
India also has a dispute with Nokia. They are asking Nokia to pay 300 million Euros in taxes stemming from income from the sale of mobile phones produced at a Nokia factory in Chennai.

Nokia says that the phones were manufactured for export and according to Indian tax law their sale was thus not subject to Indian taxation. The company says that it should be simple for the authorities to confirm that the devices were exported by looking e.g. at the customs records.

Besides that Nokia has a second tax issue with Indian government, regarding software.
PhyOrgSux
not rated yet Apr 04, 2014
I do not claim to know who is right in these cases, but based on experience in working with India and Indians in the past, corruption on higher levels of the government is a major problem there. Indian law (not to mention their culture) allows a convicted criminal to register as a candidate for election, and some such have in fact been voted to positions of power there.

Being that India does not manufacture or invent much of anything on their own volition (here excluding factories operated by foreign companies) they are dependent on providing services to clients of foreign companies (they are thus a "service economy" albeit not so much for their own people).

India's main export is Indians themselves, as the country is very populous but unable to provide employment for most of its citizens. Most higher paid employment comes from foreign corporations. For this reason an IT degree serves as an interesting alternatives to youth in a country that has a screaming need for doctors.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.