Globe had fourth hottest March; US cooler than normal

Apr 22, 2014 by Seth Borenstein
In this combination of March 2014 photos, a slackline walker enjoys the sunny and warm weather in Duesseldorf, Germany; a jogger runs on the snow-covered grounds of the Washington Monument in Washington; and a worker, suffering from heat exhaustion, leaves her shift early at the salt evaporation ponds in Anse-Rouge, Haiti. U.S. federal forecasters calculated that for most of the Earth, March 2014 was one of the hottest Marchs on record - except in the United States. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said March 2014 was the fourth hottest March in 135 years of records. The global temperature was 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the 20th century average. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein, Susan Walsh, Dieu Nalio Chery)

U.S. government forecasters calculated that for most of the Earth, last month was one of the hottest Marchs on record—except in the United States.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Tuesday that it was the fourth hottest March in 135 years of records. The overall global temperature was 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit (0.7 degree Celsius) warmer than the 20th century average.

But in the United States, March was about a degree cooler than normal, or about a half a degree Celsius. It was the 43rd coolest March on record.

Slovakia had its hottest March on record while South Korea and Latvia had their second warmest. Northern Siberia was 9 degrees (5 C) warmer than normal. Norway and Denmark averaged nearly 7 degrees (4 C) warmer than normal.

Explore further: World had fourth warmest January

4 /5 (21 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

World had fourth warmest January

Feb 20, 2014

The globe cozied up to the fourth warmest January on record this year, essentially leaving just the eastern half of the United States out in the cold.

France has had hottest year since 1900

Dec 27, 2011

This year was the hottest in France since the start of the 20th century, Meteo France said Tuesday, with average national temperatures 1.5 degrees Celsius warmer than the norm.

Recommended for you

Rising anger as Nicaragua canal to break ground

1 hour ago

As a conscripted soldier during the Contra War of the 1980s, Esteban Ruiz used to flee from battles because he didn't want to have to kill anyone. But now, as the 47-year-old farmer prepares to fight for ...

Hopes, fears, doubts surround Cuba's oil future

Dec 20, 2014

One of the most prolific oil and gas basins on the planet sits just off Cuba's northwest coast, and the thaw in relations with the United States is giving rise to hopes that Cuba can now get in on the action.

New challenges for ocean acidification research

Dec 19, 2014

Over the past decade, ocean acidification has received growing recognition not only in the scientific area. Decision-makers, stakeholders, and the general public are becoming increasingly aware of "the other carbon dioxide ...

User comments : 16

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Maggnus
4.7 / 5 (12) Apr 22, 2014
And meanwhile, somewhere in the Mid-West, Uba gets stupider........
howhot2
4.6 / 5 (9) Apr 22, 2014
Good one Maggnus. All the dim bulbs in Wichita KS just when out. KS is in total freak out. They will be the next red state to secede from the US. They must have gotten sucked up in the rapture, like in the Seth Rogen movie "This is the End". Goofy movie but it made me laugh. But your right, supider and supider...
thermodynamics
4.3 / 5 (6) Apr 23, 2014
And meanwhile, somewhere in the Mid-West, Uba gets stupider........


Maggnus, If only I could give you a 10.
runrig
4.3 / 5 (6) Apr 23, 2014
Yep, conspicuous silence from one side of the fence with this.

Mind that usually doesn't stop mind-bending bollocks being posted by them.
ubavontuba
1 / 5 (9) Apr 26, 2014
Maggnus, howhot2, thermodynamics, and runrig typify the AGWite deviancy amplification spiral.

It appears the failure of their doomsday cult prophecies likely induces a defensive stress hysteria, which subsequently traps them in a deviancy amplification spiral. That is, the more the facts line up against them, the worse they get as human beings!

Obviously, they ARE demonstrably terrible human beings.

But when the facts disagree with everything you say, what do you have left?

If these zealots were really concerned about global warming, why is it none of them are happy the globe is cooling?

http://www.woodfo....2/trend

Obviously, they don't really care about the environment. as they fight tooth and claw to hide this fact.

Captain Stumpy
4.5 / 5 (8) Apr 26, 2014
Maggnus, howhot2, thermodynamics, and runrig typify the AGWite deviancy amplification spiral.
and when someone attacks the individual because they cannot attack the empirical data, its called....??????

funny thing about your claims thus far: the above persons provide EMPIRICAL DATA supporting their arguments, or math based upon known laws of physics etc.

therefore we can conclude, by your post above, that you are attempting to discredit through repetition of a known fallacy as well as attempting to create a diversion through accusation that has no support evidentiary support.

ubavontuba
1.5 / 5 (8) Apr 26, 2014
Maggnus, howhot2, thermodynamics, and runrig typify the AGWite deviancy amplification spiral.
and when someone attacks the individual because they cannot attack the empirical data, its called....??????
I just said it. It's the the AGWite deviancy amplification spiral.

funny thing about your claims thus far: the above persons provide EMPIRICAL DATA
This is a lie. They, nor you, support the empirical data.

Here is the empirical data:

http://www.woodfo....2/trend

supporting their arguments, or math based upon known laws of physics etc.
So, name-calling is supported by math and the known laws of physics now? Really?

therefore we can conclude, by your post above, that you are attempting to discredit through repetition of a known fallacy
See? Now you are calling the empirical data, a fallacy!

as well as attempting to create a diversion through accusation that has no support evidentiary support.
The evidence is quite clear. Maggnus, howhot2, thermodynamics, runrig, and Captain Stumpy, clearly typify the AGWite deviancy amplification spiral.

Vietvet
4.4 / 5 (7) Apr 26, 2014
@uba

Hit the wrong star and gave you a rating you you don't deserve. The only spiraling going on is your descent into denialism insanity.
Captain Stumpy
4.5 / 5 (8) Apr 26, 2014
The only spiraling going on is your descent into denialism insanity.
@vietvet
and that rabbit hole goes deep, deep into uncharted territory.... there be dragons! LOL

Here is the empirical data
actually, I would say that this is an "interpretation" of empirical data. you should heed the programmer/authors words. from Woodfortree's site
...with sharp tools comes great responsibility... Please read the notes on things to beware of - and in particular on the problems with short, cherry-picked trends. Remember that the signals we are dealing with are very, very noisy, and it's easy to get misled - or worse, still to mislead others
THIS is what empirical data looks like, uba: http://www.scienc...b80bfcbc
Now you are calling the empirical data, a fallacy
when all else fails, Uba makes groundless unfounded conjecture and calls it truth

anyone with eyes can plainly see your attempts to obfuscate REALITY
Captain Stumpy
4.5 / 5 (8) Apr 26, 2014
This is a lie. They, nor you, support the empirical data.
what is not supported is baseless unfounded conjecture repeated Ad nauseam until it degenerates into frustrated attempts to get blind delusional anti-reality paid hacks like Uba to see that the empirical data says one thing whereas her data says whatever she cherry-picks or starts promoting that day/minute/whatever. It must be a very well paid job to have, sitting around attempting to sow confusion against science
Now you are calling the empirical data, a fallacy
your words, not mine, little lady. take two Midol and please re-read until comprehension sets it. You are using a site that allows you to manipulate you own data set PER THE HOMEPAGE under BEWARE SHARP TOOLS
Please read the notes on things to beware of - and in particular on the problems with short, cherry-picked trends. Remember that the signals we are dealing with are very, very noisy, and it's easy to get misled - or worse, still to mislead others.
Captain Stumpy
4.5 / 5 (8) Apr 26, 2014
You made a few typo's...let me finish this for you...
The evidence is quite clear. Maggnus, howhot2, thermodynamics, runrig, and Captain Stumpy, clearly typify the
rational tinkers ability to see through the bull of another well funded denialist program to claim irrelevant, cherry-picked distorted misleading data as empirical or factual because runrig, Mr. Thompson et al have seen real data In studies as well as empirical data from sources that show otherwise, and this is shared to show people that deniers like Uba, Ryggy et al are essentially utilizing their gluteus maximus instead of their frontal lobe

don't kiss the chocolate starfish!

http://www.scienc...b80bfcbc
its not too late to avoid trouble!

ScooterG
1.4 / 5 (9) Apr 27, 2014
"a worker, suffering from heat exhaustion, leaves her shift early at the salt evaporation ponds in Anse-Rouge, Haiti"

For the rapacious capitalist, AGW is all about money.
For the research whore, AGW is all about money.
For the AGW layman, AGW is all about emotion.
Captain Stumpy
4.4 / 5 (7) Apr 27, 2014
@Scooter
For the rapacious capitalist, AGW is all about money
personal conjecture without evidence: links? proof? EMPIRICAL DATA?
For the research whore, AGW is all about money
personal conjecture without evidence (likely based upon ignorance or stupidity): links? proof? EMPIRICAL DATA?
for the researcher and scientist it is all about the science as well as the empirical data.
For the AGW layman, AGW is all about emotion.
personal conjecture without evidence (based upon blatant stupidity): links? proof? EMPIRICAL DATA?
a worker, suffering from heat exhaustion, leaves her shift
relevance?

as you can see above and in other threads, the argument is only heated and emotional when idiots attempt to continually push the same tired argument with no empirical data for support in order to sow confusion, obfuscate reality and deny the facts.

the deniers are about MONEY and obfuscation: http://phys.org/n...ate.html

ubavontuba
1 / 5 (5) Apr 28, 2014
THIS is what empirical data looks like, uba: http://www.scienc...b80bfcbc
No, this is a paper proposing a hypothesis which may, or may not, contain some supporting empirical evidence, but it is essentially an opinion. The accuracy of this opinion is largely attributed to the accuracy and proper interpretation of the empirical data contained therein.

"Empirical evidence is information that is acquired by observation or experimentation. This data is recorded and analyzed by scientists and is a central process as part of the scientific method."

http://www.livesc...ion.html

Now you are calling the empirical data, a fallacy
when all else fails, Uba makes groundless unfounded conjecture and calls it truth
You clearly called THIS, "a known fallacy."

anyone with eyes can plainly see your attempts to obfuscate REALITY
How am I the one obfuscating, when you are the one denying the facts?

ubavontuba
1 / 5 (5) Apr 28, 2014
This is a lie. They, nor you, support the empirical data.
what is not supported is baseless unfounded conjecture repeated Ad nauseam
And here you just called the empirical evidence, "unfounded conjecture."

...until it degenerates into frustrated attempts to get blind delusional anti-reality paid hacks like Uba to see that the empirical data says one thing whereas her data says whatever she cherry-picks or starts promoting that day/minute/whatever. It must be a very well paid job to have, sitting around attempting to sow confusion against science
So now you are a conspiracist? I don't get paid for this, it's simply entertainment.

What I do get paid for, is to protect the environment.

What do you get paid for?

Now you are calling the empirical data, a fallacy
your words, not mine, little lady. take two Midol and please re-read until comprehension sets it. You are using a site that allows you to manipulate you own data set PER THE HOMEPAGE under BEWARE SHARP TOOLS
Please read the notes on things to beware of - and in particular on the problems with short, cherry-picked trends. Remember that the signals we are dealing with are very, very noisy, and it's easy to get misled - or worse, still to mislead others.
17 years of the latest available data is is not a short, cherry-picked trend.

ubavontuba
1 / 5 (5) Apr 28, 2014
You made a few typo's...let me finish this for you...
The evidence is quite clear. Maggnus, howhot2, thermodynamics, runrig, and Captain Stumpy, clearly typify the
rational tinkers ability to see through the bull of another well funded denialist program to claim irrelevant, cherry-picked distorted misleading data as empirical or factual because runrig, Mr. Thompson et al have seen real data In studies as well as empirical data from sources that show otherwise, and this is shared to show people that deniers like Uba, Ryggy et al are essentially utilizing their gluteus maximus instead of their frontal lobe
And here again, you have typified the AGWite deviancy amplification spiral.

Is this really your best argument? Is this the person you want to be?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.