Where credit is due: How acknowledging expertise can help conservation efforts

Apr 08, 2014
Researchers working in Mexico's Calakmul Biosphere Reserve have found that a failure by conservation biologists to credit the assistance of local experts is hurting both the experts and the field of conservation biology. Credit: Nora Haenn

Scientists know that tapping into local expertise is key to conservation efforts aimed at protecting biodiversity – but researchers rarely give credit to these local experts. Now some scientists are saying that's a problem, both for the local experts and for the science itself.

To address the problem, a group of scientists is calling for researchers to do a better job of publicly acknowledging the role of local experts and other non-scientists in .

"For example, in the rainforests of the Yucatán, scientists couldn't even begin to do any conservation research without local guides – between snakebites and getting lost, it would be too dangerous for outsiders to venture in alone," says Nora Haenn, lead author of a paper in Conservation Biology on the subject. "In fact, biologists doing fieldwork there entrust part of their graduate students' training to guides that understand the region and its wildlife."

According to the paper, the Mexican government itself relies on local guides to collect information on biodiversity in the region of the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, the country's largest protected area for tropical ecosystems.

"Even if they're referring to academic literature, reserve officials are looking at papers that were written by scientists who relied on guides," says Haenn, an associate professor of anthropology and international studies at NC State. "The guides are essential to this work."

However, academic papers and other scientific publications rarely give local guides full credit for their expertise. For example, guides are almost never listed as co-authors, even when they played a primary role in data collection, and often are not listed in a paper's acknowledgements.

"This is because local experts are campesinos, not members of the middle class," Haenn says. "To protect the perceived value of their research findings, and their related status in the field, scientists are hesitant to highlight the important role of local experts, because local experts don't have the social and educational pedigrees that are expected in the scientific community. Ultimately, this hurts everybody."

By failing to highlight the role of local people in conservation research, Haenn and her co-authors argue, outside observers get a skewed perspective on the relationship between local people and conservation efforts. Because locals are not acknowledged as being part of the conservation effort, they are perceived as obstacles to conservation. This makes it more difficult to identify local partners for , since outsiders are often unaware that locals already play a crucial role in conservation.

By the same token, if a scientist hasn't acknowledged the role of local guides in collecting data on a specific subject, it is much more difficult for other researchers to find relevant information to assist in future research endeavors. Certain kinds of conservation challenges, especially involving large geographical areas or poorly documented species, require significant amounts of . Because local experts interact with their environments in a more long-term way than visiting researchers, they often have the kind of detailed knowledge needed for this kind of work.

But failure to fully acknowledge the of expert guides also has serious repercussions for the guides themselves.

"A lack of formal credit in the science community means that these guides don't get the status – or the salary – that comes with being a recognized expert ," Haenn says. "And campesinos make about $10 a day, or half of what would be a middle-class salary in the region, so this has a significant impact on their quality of life.

"And while our focus was on tropical Mexico, we think our conclusions are likely relevant for conservation biologists doing fieldwork around the world," Haenn says.

Explore further: Fences cause 'ecological meltdown'

More information: "Improving Conservation Outcomes with Insights from Local Experts and Bureaucracies," Conservation Biology, 2014. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10… /cobi.12265/abstract

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Fences cause 'ecological meltdown'

Apr 03, 2014

The use of fenced areas to protect threatened species in the wild should be a last resort, argue scientists from the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS).

New action plan to save Madagascar's at-risk lemurs

Feb 21, 2014

Contrary to the film of DreamWorks' imagining, Madagascar is not ruled by King Julien and his colony of lemurs. In fact the status of the lemurs on the island – the only place on earth that they exist – ...

Sobering update on Jamaica's largest vertebrate

Apr 01, 2014

In 1990, the Jamaican iguana was removed from the list of extinct species when a small population was re-discovered on the island. Unfortunately, the species continues to be critically endangered, with only a single location ...

Recommended for you

Stranded pilot whale rescued in Cape Verde

13 minutes ago

The archipelago nation of Cape Verde is widely recognised as a marine biodiversity hotspot, not least because of the abundance of marine mammals found in its waters.

Protections blocked, but sage grouse work goes on

19 hours ago

(AP)—U.S. wildlife officials will decide next year whether a wide-ranging Western bird species needs protections even though Congress has blocked such protections from taking effect, Interior Secretary ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.