Top US court wrestles with TV, copyright and 'cloud' (Update)

Apr 22, 2014 by Rob Lever
A man watches a live television broadcast October 17, 2013 in San Francisco, California

A startup that threatens to shake up the television industry with mini antennas for Internet viewing and recording was the object of heated debate Tuesday at the US Supreme Court.

A powerful coalition of the broadcast and cable TV industries asked the panel to rule against the startup Aereo, which allows customers to rent a tiny Internet-linked antenna to watch or record over-the-air broadcasts, raising difficult copyright questions.

A similarly strong alliance that includes several technology firms and consumer groups is pressing for a different outcome, saying a ruling for Aereo would send a signal in favor of technological innovation.

At stake are billions of dollars in fees paid by cable and satellite firms, which Aereo circumvents, in what could be the most significant copyright case in decades.

Justices appeared ambivalent at times, questioning whether Aereo was violating copyright law and mulling a possible impact on the burgeoning cloud computing sector, which stores all kinds of materials online.

Impact on the cloud?

Justice Stephen Breyer queried what might happen if Aereo were found to be in violation.

"Are we somehow affecting other things such as the cloud?" he asked attorney Paul Clement, arguing on behalf of the plaintiffs including ABC television, the National Association of Broadcasters, Time Warner and others. "I don't see how you get out of it."

Justice Samuel Alito offered a similar view, saying, "I want to know what impact this will have on other technology."

Aereo, which is backed by media mogul Barry Diller, launched in early 2012 in the New York area and was immediately sued by the major broadcast networks—ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox—for copyright infringement.

The company, which is expanding to other cities, claims its actions are legal because it is not rebroadcasting, but giving subscribers a personal antenna in its New York warehouse that enables them to watch live TV or record it for later viewing.

A US appeals court panel agreed with Aereo, ruling it was not retransmitting "public performances," which would be banned under copyright law, but merely allowing customers to rent antennas to receive and record free broadcasts.

Clement urged the justices to put aside the issue of cloud computing and simply consider the copyright issue—claiming Aereo gets around royalty fees that similar services such as cable must pay.

"There is a fundamental difference between a company that provides an ongoing service to the public and an online locker," the attorney said.

But Chief Justice John Roberts pondered the Aereo argument that it was merely renting equipment that a consumer could use legally.

"You can go to Radio Shack and buy an antenna and a DVR (digital video recorder), or you could rent those facilities somewhere else from Aereo."

'Not a cable service'

This point was emphasized by attorney David Frederick, arguing for Aereo.

"We are not a cable service," he said. "Aereo is an equipment provider."

The lawyer said Aereo allows consumers "to replicate in the cloud what they could do on their own."

While the justices expressed concern about impacting the cloud industry, some also voiced skepticism about whether Aereo was designed as a ruse to evade retransmission fees.

Roberts said, "Your technological model is based solely on circumventing legal prohibitions that you don't want to comply with."

Much of the debate centered on whether Aereo was in fact transmitting a signal, which would be a "public performance" under copyright law and not a private way of shifting the viewing of a program—the subject of a landmark 1984 ruling on Sony and its Betamax recorders.

The US government, backing the broadcasters, argued that Aereo is in fact a transmission service and violates US copyright law.

Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart told the justices Aereo is similar to cable television that uses "one big antenna" and "ought to be paying royalties."

Breyer said that even if one concedes the notion of public performance, he was at a loss in how to craft an opinion that fails to impact cloud computing.

The National Football League and Major League Baseball have backed the broadcasters, claiming it would upset longstanding copyright traditions.

And some broadcast executives have threatened to end over-the-air transmissions, which would force consumers to watch those channels on cable or satellite.

The Computer and Communications Industry Association, which represents tech giants Google, Facebook and Yahoo, is supporting Aereo.

"The case has ramifications reaching far beyond the future of Aereo and change-resistant broadcasters," said CCIA President Ed Black.

"It's about the future of an essential aspect of Internet commerce: cloud computing."

The justices are expected to issue a ruling by the end of June.

Explore further: Streaming TV case before Supreme Court on Tuesday

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Virtual reality guides those whose memory is failing

19 minutes ago

Experts agree that the ability to navigate a neighborhood or built space is one of the first faculties to suffer at the onset of cognitive decline. They also agree that early intervention is crucial for stemming ...

Why conspiracy theorists won't give up on MH17 and MH370

49 minutes ago

A huge criminal investigation is underway in the Netherlands, following the downing of flight MH17. Ten Dutch prosecutors and 200 policemen are involved in collecting evidence to present at the International Criminal Court in the Hague. The inv ...

Twitter tries to block images of Foley killing

58 minutes ago

Twitter is trying to block the spread of gruesome images of the beheading of journalist James Foley by Islamic State militants, while a movement to deny his killers the publicity they crave is also gaining ...

User comments : 0