Antibiotics in manure a far-reaching impact on abundance of human pathogenic bacteria in soils

Apr 07, 2014

Scientists of Helmholtz Zentrum München, in a joint study with researchers of Julius Kühn Institute in Braunschweig, have found that the repeated application of manure contaminated with antibiotics lastingly changes the composition of bacteria in the soil. The focus of the investigation was on sulfadiazine (SDZ), a widely used antibiotic in animal husbandry which enters the soil via manure. In the latest issue of the journal PLoS ONE, the researchers report that repeated application of the antibiotic leads to a decrease in beneficial soil bacteria and at the same time an increase in bacteria that are harmful to humans.

Since antibiotics are commonly used in animal husbandry, the implications for agricultural areas that are fertilized with the manure of these animals are of great interest. The study results confirmed the scientists' hypothesis that the application of antibiotics has an effect on the composition of . "After repeated application of contaminated with antibiotics, we found a decrease in the bacteria that are important for good soil quality. This means a loss of soil fertility and thus in the long run a decline in crop yields," said Professor Michael Schloter, head of Research Unit Environmental Genomics at Helmholtz Zentrum München. "Moreover, the number of microbes living in the soil that are harmful to humans increased under the experimental conditions of the study."

Wide-reaching consequences for human health

"The increase in human pathogenic microorganisms in the environment has wide-reaching consequences for ," says Professor Schloter. "We are in continous contact with these microorganisms, and the probability of contracting an infection increases accordingly. This applies particularly to diseases of the respiratory system and the lungs, as bacteria are spread through the air and inhaled. Moreover, many of the bacteria are resistant to commonly used antibiotics, which often makes treatment more difficult. We must therefore urgently develop a new mindset as regards the use of in ."

Explore further: Obama says 'no greater threat to planet than climate change'

More information: Ding, G-C. et al. (2014), "Dynamics of soil bacterial communities in response to repeated application of manure containing sulfadiazine," PLOS ONE, 9(3): e92958, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092958.

Related Stories

Antibiotic-eating bug unearthed in soil

Dec 07, 2012

It's well known how bacteria exposed to antibiotics for long periods will find ways to resist the drugs—by quickly pumping them out of their cells, for instance, or modifying the compounds so they're no longer toxic.

Recommended for you

Mountain of electrical waste reaches new peak

5 hours ago

A record amount of electrical and electronic waste hit the rubbish tips in 2014, with the biggest per-capita tallies in countries that pride themselves on environmental consciousness, a report said Sunday.

China's struggle for water security

Apr 18, 2015

Way back in 1999, before he became China's prime minister, Wen Jiabao warned that water scarcity posed one of the greatest threats to the "survival of the nation".

Canada revises upward CO2 emission data since 1990

Apr 18, 2015

Canada revised its greenhouse gas emission data from 1990 to 2013 in a report Friday, showing it had higher carbon dioxide discharges each year, and a doubling of emissions from its oil sands.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

PPihkala
5 / 5 (1) Apr 07, 2014
It has been long known that giving antibiotics to healthy animals is very shortsighted policy. Therefore all countries that still allow it, should ban it yesterday. That is much cheaper than to treat the manure so that such antibiotics are destroyed. The only way I know of doing that would be to heat the manure to high enough temperature, which is too costly to gain any usage.

Unfortunately this also applies to human waste, so human drug residues also get into environment because wastewater facilities are not capable to remove these substances during processing.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.