Ancient volcanic explosions shed light on Mercury's origins

Apr 02, 2014
Data from NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft has shown that pyroclastic deposits are widespread on Mercury. The deposits are the telltale sign of explosive volcanism, which scientists long thought Mercury did not have. Credit: NASA/ MESSENGER/ Head Lab/Brown University

Mercury was long thought to be lacking volatile compounds that cause explosive volcanism. That view started to change when the MESSENGER spacecraft returned pictures of pyroclastic deposits—the telltale signature of volcanic explosions. Now more detailed data from MESSENGER shows that volcanoes exploded on Mercury for a substantial portion of the planet's history. The findings suggest Mercury not only had volatiles but held on to them for longer than scientists had expected.

The surface of Mercury crackled with for extended periods of the planet's history, according to a new analysis led by researchers at Brown University. The findings are surprising considering Mercury wasn't supposed to have explosive volcanism in the first place, and they could have implications for understanding how Mercury formed.

On Earth, volcanic explosions like the one that tore the lid off Mount St. Helens happen because our planet's interior is rich in volatiles—water, carbon dioxide and other compounds with relatively low boiling points. As lava rises from the depths toward the surface, volatiles dissolved within it change phase from liquid to gas, expanding in the process. The pressure of that expansion can cause the crust above to burst like an overinflated balloon.

Mercury, however, was long thought to be bone dry when it comes to volatiles, and without volatiles there can't be explosive volcanism. But that view started to change in 2008, after NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft made its first flybys of Mercury. Those glimpses of the surface revealed deposits of pyroclastic ash—the telltale signs of volcanic explosions—peppering the planet's surface. It was a clue that at some point in its history Mercury's interior wasn't as bereft of volatiles as had been assumed.

What wasn't clear from those initial flybys was the timeframe over which those explosions occurred. Did Mercury's volatiles escape in a flurry of explosions early in the planet's history or has Mercury held on to its volatiles over a much longer period?

This latest work, available in online early view at the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, suggests the latter.

A team of researchers led by Tim Goudge, a graduate student in the Department of Geological Sciences at Brown, looked at 51 pyroclastic sites distributed across Mercury's surface. They used data from MESSENGER's cameras and spectrometers collected after the spacecraft entered orbit around Mercury in 2011. Compared with the data from the initial flybys, the orbital data provided a much more detailed view of the deposits and the source vents that spat them out.

The new MESSENGER data revealed that some of the vents have eroded to a much greater degree than others—an indicator that the explosions didn't happen all at the same time.

"If [the explosions] happened over a brief period and then stopped, you'd expect all the vents to be degraded by approximately the same amount," Goudge said. "We don't see that; we see different degradation states. So the eruptions appear to have been taking place over an appreciable period of Mercury's history."

But just where that period of explosiveness fits into Mercury's geological history was another matter. To help figure that out, Goudge and his colleagues took advantage of the fact that most of the sites are located within impact craters. The age of each crater offers an important constraint in the age of the pyroclastic deposit inside it: The deposit has to be younger than its host crater. If the deposit had come first, it would have been obliterated by the impact that formed the crater. So the age of the crater provides an upper limit on how old the pyroclastic deposit can be.

As it happens, there's an established method for dating craters on Mercury. The rims and walls of craters become eroded and degraded over time, and the extent of that degradation can be used to get an approximate age of the crater.

Using that method, Goudge and his colleagues showed that some pyroclastic deposits are found in relatively young (geologically speaking) craters dated to between 3.5 and 1 billion years old. The finding helps rule out the possibility that all the pyroclastic activity happened shortly after Mercury's formation around 4.5 billion years ago.

"These ages tell us that Mercury didn't degas all of its volatiles very early," Goudge said. "It kept some of its volatiles around to more recent geological times."

The extent to which Mercury's volatiles stuck around could shed light on how the planet formed. Despite being the smallest planet in the solar system (since Pluto was demoted from the ranks of the planets), Mercury has an abnormally large iron core. That finding led to speculation the perhaps Mercury was once much larger, but had its outer layers removed—either fried away by the nearby Sun or perhaps blasted away be a huge impact early in the planet's history. Either of those events, however, would likely have heated the outer parts of Mercury enough to remove volatiles very early in its history.

In light of this study and other data collected by MESSENGER showing traces of the volatiles sulfur, potassium, and sodium on Mercury's surface, both those scenarios seem increasingly unlikely.

"Together with other results that suggest the Moon may have had more volatiles than previously thought, this research is revolutionizing our thinking about the early history of the and satellites," said Jim Head, professor of and a MESSENGER mission co-investigator. "These results define specific targets for future exploration of Mercury by orbiting and landed spacecraft."

Explore further: Explosive volcanoes light up Mercury's deep past

More information: Paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10… 013JE004480/abstract

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Explosive volcanoes light up Mercury's deep past

Jan 31, 2014

Mercury has long been a mystery to scientists. Until recently, knowledge of the planet was limited to the grey, patchy landscape revealed by the Mariner 10 probe, NASA's first mission to Mercury in the mid-1970s. ...

Image: Sunlit side of the planet Mercury

Oct 29, 2013

Another day, another beautiful view of Mercury's horizon. In this scene, which was acquired looking from the shadows toward the sunlit side of the planet, a 120-km (75 mi.) impact crater stands out near the ...

MESSENGER sees a smoother side of Mercury

Mar 22, 2013

During its two years in orbit around Mercury—as well as several more years performing flybys—the MESSENGER spacecraft has taken over 150,000 images of the innermost planet, giving us a look at its incredibly ...

Mercury's many colors

Jul 27, 2012

Although composited from expanded wavelengths of light, this wide-angle image from NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft shows the amazing variation of colors and tones to be found on Mercury’s Sun-scoured ...

Recommended for you

Light of life

10 hours ago

A fluorescent microscopic view of cells from a type of bone cancer, being studied for a future trip to deep space – aiming to sharpen our understanding of the hazardous radiation prevailing out there.

Local model better describes lunar gravity

15 hours ago

Two satellites orbiting the Moon as a part of NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission have been mapping its inner structure by measuring subtle shifts in the pull of gravity on the ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
not rated yet Apr 02, 2014
So the age of the crater provides an upper limit on how old the pyroclastic deposit can be.


Just nitpicking, but this would establish a lower limit, chronologically --as opposed to an upper, as it is written.

Also, it is impossible to say from our current level of understanding, to what extent these volatiles have been exhausted. The reasonable assumption would be that those in situ were locked into Mercury's geochemistry as soon as its inner layers were cooled enough that magmas could no longer form.
GSwift7
not rated yet Apr 03, 2014
Just nitpicking, but this would establish a lower limit, chronologically --as opposed to an upper, as it is written


I did a double-take as well, but it makes sense as written. It's an upper limit on the age, basically saying that the volcano cannot be older than x number of years.
GSwift7
not rated yet Apr 03, 2014
as for the article itself:

I wonder about the lack of an atmosphere, and how that relates to the amount of volatiles it takes to cause an explosive eruption. With nearly zero surface pressure, as well as low surface gravity, and a sharper gravity gradient from core to surface, explosive eruptions might happen more easily. With a steeper gravity gradient, bouyant magma would rise more forcefully and with less surface gravity it would encounter less resistance from the crust, not to mention that zero surface pressure would allow gas to expand more.

Not to imply that they didn't think about that, but just wanted to highlight how different these things can be on another planet.