The technological search for MH370's black box

Mar 31, 2014 by Erik Van Sebille
Australian Navy vessel Ocean Shield left Perth yesterday to join the search for missing flight MH370 and its black box flight recorders. Credit: AAP/Tim Clarke

As the effort to find Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 moves inexorably towards the recovery stage, the challenge of finding the plane's flight recorder (called the "black box" even though it's actually bright orange) on the ocean floor will become a game of blind man's bluff spread over thousands of kilometres.

The inability to penetrate the darkness of the ocean has long been a major handicap for deep-sea exploration. It is why we know more about the surface of the moon than the bottom of the deep ocean.

In a nutshell, the problem is that seawater is opaque to electromagnetic radiation, such as radio waves, microwaves and X-rays. This means that almost none of our normal techniques to "see" over can be used in the ocean.

As you go deeper into the ocean, it gets darker. People who have dived know that colours are quite different once you get to 20m deep. Red starts to look green and, eventually, everything gets greyer.

Once you get down more than 100m, the ocean is essentially pitch black – leaving almost 4km of darkness in most parts of the ocean – because light is absorbed in seawater.

It's not only visible light that gets lost. All forms of electromagnetic radiation are sooner or later damped out.

Most of our techniques to remotely study objects (the moon, stars, but also clouds in the atmosphere or ships on the surface of the ocean) rely heavily on electromagnetic radiation. This type of radiation forms the basis of radar, GPS and essentially all telecommunication.

But oceanographers who want to study the can't use most common tools, such as satellites or .

The bright colour of black boxes doesn’t help when submerged in 4,000m of seawater. Credit: AvgeekJoe/Flickr, CC BY-SA

Listen to this

The only signal that can travel through seawater is sound. Sound travels extremely well through seawater; much better than through air. This is why some whales and other marine animals can hear each other over thousands of kilometres.

It's no surprise, then, that black boxes on aeroplanes have "pingers" that transmit a sound signal. But while sound travels long distances under water, it isn't a very efficient way of transmitting information: you can't pack too much information in it and it costs much more energy than .

Another problem is that sound doesn't travel in a straight line in the ocean and can reflect off sea mountains to create echoes, making it sometimes difficult to locate its origin. The speed and path of sound varies with temperature and salinity and it can bend up or down. In some extreme cases, it can even be reflected in the middle of the ocean.

In layers where the temperature and salinity change rapidly with depth, these layers act as mirrors and can cause some sounds to be completely lost. Naval submarines are extremely good at hiding themselves underneath these mirrors, making them all but invisible to ships on the surface.

Oceanographers have been struggling with this lack of a good way to transmit signals through the ocean for decades. It means that submarines can't use GPS to get their position, and that data from subsurface instruments need to be either locally stored on logging devices (which then need to be retrieved) or transmitted via cables to land or ship.

What happens when the pings stop?

If the flight recorders can't be found using the pinger, it is very likely the ocean floor will need to be scoured using sonar. Again, this is technology based on sound, but is not nearly as accurate as, for instance, radar or photography of the land surface.

As sound bounces around under water it can change intensity and create confusing reflections.

The real dilemma for the search team is how high above the ocean floor to take the sonar "pictures":

  • too high up and the plane wreck might be missed because the resolution is too poor
  • too close to the ocean floor and it will take much more time to map the entire area.

In this sense, it doesn't help that we don't have any good maps of the already. If we would have such maps, we could simply put post-plane crash maps on top of them and see where they differ. These locations could then be scrutinised for possible wreckage, and regions where there are no differences can initially be skipped.

The problems faced by the search time of the MH370 are very similar to those of the Air France AF447 flight that went down in the Atlantic Ocean in 2009. Back then, the was not able to locate the with a pinger signal.

A diagram of seafloor sonar ‘pictures’ taken by a ship. Credit: NOAA's National Ocean Service/Flickr, CC BY

The search took two years, and it was only through months of scouring the floor with submarines and sonar that the black box was finally found.

Let's hope MH370's black box can be located sooner and provide some much-needed insight to the flight's mystery.

Explore further: How could ocean currents affect search for missing Malaysian Airlines flight MH370?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Technology hindered, helped search for Flight 370

Mar 28, 2014

The disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 has presented two tales of modern technology. The limitations of tracking and communications devices allowed the plane to vanish from sight for nearly three ...

Recommended for you

IOC defends Rio legacy amid green protests

2 hours ago

Ecological protests on Saturday dogged the final day of an International Olympic Committee executive board meeting in Rio as green campaigners slated the choice of a nature reserve to hold the golf event ...

Japan's NTT to buy German data centre operator

2 hours ago

Japanese telecom giant NTT Communications is looking to acquire German data centre operator e-shelter, as it seeks to cash in on growing demand in Europe, a newspaper reported Saturday.

Fashionable or geeky—the modern watch dilemma

6 hours ago

It's Milan fashion week, you've got tickets to the catwalk shows and an outfit to die for, but which watch to wear? A chunky smartwatch or chic ticker that can't tell the time?

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.