Southeast England most at risk of rising deaths due to climate change

Mar 23, 2014

Warmer summers brought on by climate change will cause more deaths in London and southeast England than the rest of the country, scientists predict.

Researchers at Imperial College London looked at temperature records and mortality figures for 2001 to 2010 to find out which districts in England and Wales experience the biggest effects from warm temperatures.

In the most vulnerable districts, in London and the southeast, the odds of dying from cardiovascular or respiratory causes increased by over 10 per cent for every 1C rise in temperature. Districts in the far north were much more resilient, seeing no increase in deaths at equivalent temperatures.

Writing in Nature Climate Change, the researchers say local variations in climate change vulnerability should be taken into account when assessing the risks and choosing policy responses.

Dr James Bennett, the lead author of the study from the MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health at Imperial College London, said: "It's well known that can increase the risk of cardiovascular and respiratory deaths, especially in elderly people. Climate change is expected to raise average temperatures and increase temperature variability, so we can expect it to have effects on mortality even in countries like the UK with a temperate climate."

Across England and Wales as a whole, a summer that is 2C warmer than average would be expected to cause around 1,550 extra deaths, the study found. Just over half would be in people aged over 85, and 62 per cent would be in women. The extra deaths would be distributed unevenly, with 95 out of 376 districts accounting for half of all deaths.

The effects of were similar in urban and rural districts. The most vulnerable districts included deprived districts in London such as Hackney and Tower Hamlets, with the odds of dying more than doubling on very hot days like those of August 2003.

"The reasons for the uneven distribution of deaths in warm weather need to be studied," said Professor Majid Ezzati, from the School of Public Health at Imperial, who led the research. "It might be due to more vulnerable individuals being concentrated in some areas, or it might be related to differences at the community level, like quality of healthcare, that require government action.

"We might expect that people in areas that tend to be warmer would be more resilient, because they adapt by installing air conditioning for example. These results show that this isn't the case in England and Wales.

"While is a global phenomenon, resilience and vulnerability to its effects are highly local. Many things can be done at the local level to reduce the impact of warm spells, like alerting the public and planning for emergency services. Detailed information about which communities are most at risk from high temperatures can help to inform these strategies."

Explore further: Hot weather deaths projected to rise 257 percent by 2050s, experts warn

More information: J.E. Bennett et al, 'Vulnerability to the mortality effects of warm temperature in England's and Wales' districts.' Nature Climate Change 23 March 2014 DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2123

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Climate change increased the number of deaths

Oct 22, 2013

The increased temperatures caused by ongoing climate change in Stockholm, Sweden between 1980 and 2009 caused 300 more premature deaths than if the temperature increase did not take place. In Sweden as a whole, it would mean ...

Recommended for you

New paper calls for more carbon capture and storage research

1 hour ago

Federal efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must involve increased investment in research and development of carbon capture and storage technologies, according to a new paper published by the University of Wyoming's ...

Coal gas boom in China holds climate change risks

6 hours ago

Deep in the hilly grasslands of remote Inner Mongolia, twin smoke stacks rise more than 200 feet into the sky, their steam and sulfur billowing over herds of sheep and cattle. Both day and night, the rumble ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Porgie
3 / 5 (6) Mar 23, 2014
Yeah, people are dying warm and happy.
Feldagast
1.8 / 5 (5) Mar 23, 2014
But after enough die we will reduce everyone's overall carbon footprint wont we?
kivahut
3 / 5 (4) Mar 23, 2014
Did the authors look at the death trends during the Medieval Climate Optimum, 800-1400? Populations exploded, as did the Plague. Fun times.
gregor1
2.6 / 5 (5) Mar 23, 2014
I know! Why don't we raise the price of energy, throw hundreds of thousands into energy poverty, and let them die by the tens of thousands from the cold in the winter?
ThomasQuinn
3 / 5 (4) Mar 24, 2014
I'm beginning to think that the climate-change deniers don't disbelieve climate change, they simply hate progress.
Squirrel
3 / 5 (2) Mar 24, 2014
No increase in deaths--just a massive increase in the number of air conditioners sold.
verkle
2 / 5 (4) Mar 24, 2014
Articles like this is what causes suspicions about climate politics. Typical hogwash (sorry for an American term, my dear British cousins).

Neal Asher
1 / 5 (3) Mar 24, 2014
And, as is usual, a study ignoring the reduction in the much larger number of people who die from the cold.