Pessimism of early global policy architects stunted developing nations' economies, study finds

Mar 25, 2014
Pessimism of early global policy architects stunted developing nations' economies: Harvard study
Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950), an Austrian-born Harvard scholar ranked among the world's most influential economists. His 1911 book, "The Theory of Economic Development," advanced the notion that innovation and individual entrepreneurship are the dynamic foundations of a nation's economic evolution, that "creative destruction" and the renewal of tools and processes within an economy continuously refreshes the system and results in rising prosperity, ideas deemed inapplicable to developing countries by pessimistic architects of global development policies in the 1950s. Credit: Wikipedia

Influential economic ideas first advanced in 1911—stressing innovation and entrepreneurialism as the fundamental generators of growth and wealth—were deemed inappropriate for developing countries, stunting progress in many parts of the world throughout the 20th century, says a distinguished Harvard academic.

In a newly-published paper, Calestous Juma of the Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Centre for Science and International Affairs calls on emerging economy countries and development agencies to revisit and adopt ideas rejected in the 1950s by "pessimistic" architects of early international development policies and institutions.

Prof. Juma's paper examines the impact of Joseph Schumpeter, an Austrian-born Harvard scholar ranked among the world's most influential economists, whose 1911 book, The Theory of Economic Development, advanced the notion that and individual entrepreneurship are the dynamic foundations of a nation's economic evolution, that "creative destruction" and the renewal of tools and processes within an economy continuously refreshes the system and results in rising prosperity.

His then ground-breaking ideas inspired innovation-led economic policies in but were dismissed as irrelevant to developing countries as policies and programs took shape within fledgling institutions in the 1950s such as the United Nations, World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

According to Prof. Juma, "pessimism" prevailed in early development economics, resulting in an emphasis on "the use of basic or 'appropriate technologies,' central planning, role of bureaucracies as sources of economic stability, and food aid" for developing nations, rather than innovation, entrepreneurship and industrial development.

Appearing in a new journal, Policy and Complex Systems, Prof. Juma notes that after a decade of debate the architects of development economics rejected innovation-oriented policies and adopted "static, linear, and incremental view of economic change" for the newly independent countries.

To quote US central banker Henry Wallich, one leading economic thinker of 1952: "In applying this (Schumpeter's) doctrine to the less developed countries of our day, we find that it does not fit."

Said Mr. Wallich, in less developed countries the entrepreneur "is not the main driving force, innovation is not the most characteristic process, and private enrichment is not the dominant goal." He advocated the idea of "derived development"—i.e. derived from innovation in other countries.

Says Prof. Juma: "This view would lock emerging countries at the tail end of the product cycle, making them perpetual importers of foreign products with no capacity for technological learning."

"Technical fields such as science, technology, and engineering were largely considered irrelevant to emerging countries except in limited areas where they supported assimilation of imported products or inevitable areas of adaptive research such as plant breeding. Even more critical was the low priority given to higher education in general and higher technical education in particular."

He adds: "For poor seeking to catch up economically, innovation-led growth provided a more intuitive path. The policies recommended for them, however, were tedious, hobbling and demoralizing." Asian nations such as South Korea and Singapore that ignored the pessimists successfully adopted innovation-driven economic strategies. Today, he notes, "researchers and policymakers are now reshaping development policies in the context of innovation."

"Schumpeter laid out the foundations for understanding how economies change over time," says Prof. Juma. "That was a century ago. Several enduring themes of his theory remain valid today and should be part of the core of the policies of emerging nations."

Prof. Juma recommends developing nations and development institutions today:

  • Give priority to the role of innovation, not only in transforming economic systems to new levels of performance in all sectors, but also in spreading prosperity
  • Invest in transformative infrastructure projects that lay the foundations for economic transformation
  • Build the technical capacity, especially in engineering fields, that is needed to drive growth through the translation of knowledge into goods and services
  • Emphasize the role of entrepreneurs and risk-taking in the private and public sectors as critical agents of innovation

Prof. Juma's paper is drawn from a book with the tentative title, How Economies Succeed: Innovation and the Wealth of Nations, publication of which is anticipated in 2016. His next book, Innovation and Its Enemies: Resistance to New Technology, is expected in 2015.

He is also preparing for release in 2015 an updated edition of his influential book, The New Harvest in which he proposes a route by which Africa could feed itself within a generation—a clear prescription of innovative approaches for placing agriculture at the center of sub-Saharan Africa's economic transformation.

The strategy calls on governments to make African agricultural expansion central to decision making about infrastructure (energy, transportation, irrigation and telecommunications), technical education, entrepreneurship and regional economic integration. (See also http://bit.ly/134nNyN)

Explore further: The scientific legacy of colonialism in Africa

Provided by Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs

4 /5 (5 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The scientific legacy of colonialism in Africa

Mar 19, 2014

Colonial legacy has a significant impact on scientific productivity across the continent of Africa, according to a study by researchers at the University of Lomé, in Togo. Writing in the International Journal of Education Ec ...

Newly minted Mexico must innovate

Mar 12, 2014

MINT is the new BRIC, according to Fidelity, a Boston-based asset management firm. The term, referring to the rapidly developing and growing nations of Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey, has moved into popular economics ...

Recommended for you

Narcissistic CEOs and financial performance

Jul 24, 2014

Narcissism, considered by some as the "dark side of the executive personality," may actually be a good thing when it comes to certain financial measures, with companies led by narcissistic CEOs outperforming those helmed ...

Drugmaker GSK slashes annual profits forecast

Jul 23, 2014

British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline on Wednesday slashed its 2014 profits forecast as second-quarter earnings sank on the back of weak US trade, adverse currency moves and a Chinese bribery probe.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Dunbar
not rated yet Mar 26, 2014
Erm... the integration of these local economies into the wider global economy was conducted under neo-liberal auspices since the late 1970s; the economies were opened to international trade to establish their comparative advantage from the "bottom up". Unfortunately, this didn't workout; nearly all the economies faired worse, in terms of GDP growth, compared to earlier periods of State led development, and in some cases the economies collapsed entirely.

Countries that resisted neo-liberal proscriptions have performed far better, on the whole; their adoption of quasi-Hamiltonian protectionist policies for nascent industries have resulted in rapid technological, and thus economic, development.
Squirrel
not rated yet Mar 26, 2014
"Build the technical capacity, especially in engineering fields"--better tell that to the UK government that does its best to underfund UK engineering.