Curbing pesticides will slash wheat yields, study says

Mar 20, 2014
A farmer harvests a wheat field with a combine harvester in Mametz, northern France, on August 13, 2013

France's winter wheat harvest could shrink by over a tenth if farmers meet targets to halve pesticide use, said a study Thursday highlighting the challenge of feeding Earth's growing population.

The estimates come from field trials where scientists compared yields to cuts in pesticide use.

Extrapolated for the country as a whole, halving pesticide use could mean a decline in winter wheat production of two to three million tonnes per year, the researchers said.

This amounts to a reduction of five to 13 percent of national production of winter wheat, and 15 percent of French wheat exports.

Halving pesticide use "may not be profitable for farmers", the team wrote in the Nature journal Scientific Reports.

With projections of an extra two billion mouths to feed by 2050 and a shortage of new farmland, increasing crop yield per hectare has never been as urgent.

Pesticides played a crucial role in doubling the average yield of cereal crops worldwide from 1960 to 1990, but their impact on human health and biodiversity have made them controversial.

European farmers are encouraged to limit pesticide use, and French environmental policy targets a 50-percent reduction by 2018.

Now researchers have calculated what the impact of such a policy is likely to be.

They used data from 176 experimental farming plots from four sites in France that compared yields for wheat grown with pesticides, with less pesticides, or with none.

Statistical modelling then estimated a broader scenario for France.

The country had average wheat yield of 7.11 tonnes per hectare between 2008 and 2012. With a 50 percent pesticide reduction, the yield dropped by 0.4 to 0.9 tonnes per hectare, compared to 2-2.3 tonnes per hectare if pesticides are eliminated altogether, the team found.

Savings from using less pesticide would not make up the difference.

Halving pesticide use would decrease input costs for by about 66 euros per hectare in France, said the team.

This means a yield loss of 0.4 tonnes per hectare (80 euros lost per hectare) would be only partly compensated, at current wheat prices of more than 200 euros ($280) per tonne.

"Even with the smallest estimated grain yield loss, a 50 percent... reduction may not be profitable for farmers," the team wrote.

There might be gains in other areas, said the team, by reducing the cost, for example, of purifying pesticide-polluted water—estimated at between four and 15 billion euros in France in 2011.

The study was not designed to test whether reduced had an impact on other crop types or whether the switch had environmental benefits that could affect yields in the longer term.

Explore further: Study raises concerns about global crop projections

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study raises concerns about global crop projections

Dec 20, 2013

About 30 percent of the major global cereal crops – rice, wheat and corn – may have reached their maximum possible yields in farmers' fields, according to University of Nebraska-Lincoln research published this week in ...

Genetic discovery to keep crops disease-free

Feb 10, 2014

Curtin University researchers have found a way to breed disease-resistant wheat with no downside, potentially bringing multi-million dollar savings to Australia's agricultural industry.

Is reducing environmental impact in the EU feasible?

Jan 30, 2014

By 2023 all EU member states must be complying with more stringent guidelines related to Integrated Pest Management (IPM). "The essence of the new guideline is reducing the environmental impact of pesticides," ...

Study: Pesticides found in wine

Apr 04, 2008

A European environmental group said pesticides used on grapes were found in 35 of the 40 bottles of wine they tested.

Recommended for you

Five ways to stop the world's wildlife vanishing

5 hours ago

Full marks to colleagues at the World Wildlife Fund and the Zoological Society of London for the Living Planet Report 2014 and its headline message which one hopes ought to shock the world out of its com ...

Protected areas offer glimmers of hope for wildlife

9 hours ago

National parks and other protected areas offer hope for threatened species at a time of plunging wildlife numbers, conservationist group WWF said Tuesday, but their success has not been universal.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rockwolf1000
not rated yet Mar 21, 2014
"There might be gains in other areas, said the team, by reducing the cost, for example, of purifying pesticide-polluted water—estimated at between four and 15 billion euros in France in 2011."

Clearly these costs and all other costs associated with pesticide use should be included in the price of the treating crops to get a more accurate and realistic understanding. Moreover, there will be other benefits from using less pesticides which should also be included in the calculation.
How these people are able to generate a scientific paper while ignoring the "Big Picture" is a mystery to me. Absolutely useless information.