Top US court sifts arguments on software patents

Mar 31, 2014
A view of the US Supreme Court seen from the top of the US Capitol dome in this December 19, 2013 in Washington

The US Supreme Court heard arguments Monday on whether patents can be enforced for software-created business practices, in a case likely to have a big impact on the tech sector.

Justices appeared to express skepticism over the patent argument in the case brought by Alice Corp. against CLS Bank over its patented process for financial transactions.

"All you're talking about, if I may use that term, is an idea," said Justice Anthony Kennedy, in an exchange with Alice Corp. attorney Carter Phillips.

The attorney for Alice Corp, an Australian-based financial services firm, said that a ruling against the company "puts hundreds of thousands of in balance."

The case comes amid heated debate in the technology sector over patents. Some claim the patent system is being abused by so-called "junk" patents of ordinary ideas but others claim patent enforcement is needed to protect innovators.

CLS is accused of violating the Alice patents in a system that assesses the financial risks of daily exchanges to ensure against losses.

An appeals court upheld the verdict for Alice Corp, but CLS is backed by the US government and some key tech firms including Google and Facebook. But other companies in the sector support Alice Corp.

"Applying the program simply on a physical machine like a computer is not patentable," CLS attorney Mark Perry told the justices.

Justice Stephen Breyer appeared to back that argument, saying the case was about "an abstract idea."

"You're doing through a machine what you used to do by hand. It's not an invention," added Justice Antonin Scalia.

The parties discussed the applicability of the US Patent Act, which bans patents for "laws of nature, physical phenomena and abstract ideas."

Arguing for President Barack Obama's administration, US Solicitor General Donald Verrilli said of such patents: "We're not saying they can't do it. We're saying they can't monopolize it."

The top US court last year ruled that human genes could not be patented in a case involving a company holding patents on genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

A decision in the case is expected by late June.

Explore further: US court case could mean doom for software patents (Update)

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Supreme Court could limit software patents

Mar 31, 2014

The Supreme Court appears willing to make it tougher to approve patents for computer software in a case that is being closely watched by technology companies.

Apple risks hefty fee in Germany patent trial

Feb 05, 2014

Apple is caught up in a new patent battle in Germany, risking a 1.5-billion-euro fine at a trial over the iPhone's emergency phone-dialling feature, the regional court of Mannheim said on Wednesday.

High court ruling on gene patents lifts Myriad

Jun 13, 2013

Shares of diagnostic test maker Myriad Genetics Inc. are jumping Thursday after the Supreme Court issued a mixed ruling in a case involving the company's patents on genes at the center of its tests for increased risk of bre ...

Recommended for you

Microsoft skips Windows 9 to emphasize advances

Sep 30, 2014

The next version of Microsoft's flagship operating system will be called Windows 10, as the company skips version 9 to emphasize advances it is making toward a world centered on mobile devices and Internet ...

User comments : 0