A promising concept on the path to fusion energy

March 31, 2014 by John Greenwald
QUASAR stellerator design. Credit: PPPL

(Phys.org) —Completion of a promising experimental facility at the U.S. Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Laboratory (PPPL) could advance the development of fusion as a clean and abundant source of energy for generating electricity, according to a PPPL paper published this month in the journal IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

The facility, called the Quasi-Axisymmetric Stellarator Research (QUASAR) experiment, represents the first of a new class of reactors based on the innovative theory of quasi-axisymmetry, which makes it possible to design a magnetic bottle that combines the advantages of the stellarator with the more widely used tokamak design. Experiments in QUASAR would test this theory. Construction of QUASAR—originally known as the National Compact Stellarator Experiment—was begun in 2004 and halted in 2008 when costs exceeded projections after some 80 percent of the machine's major components had been built or procured.

"This type of facility must have a place on the roadmap to fusion," said physicist George "Hutch" Neilson, the head of the Advanced Projects Department at PPPL.

Both stellarators and tokamaks use magnetic fields to control the hot, charged gas that fuels fusion reactions. While tokamaks put electric current into the plasma to complete the magnetic confinement and hold the gas together, stellarators don't require such a current to keep the plasma bottled up. Stellarators rely instead on twisting—or 3D —magnetic fields to contain the plasma in a controlled "steady state."

Stellarator plasmas thus run little risk of disrupting—or falling apart—as can happen in tokamaks if the internal current abruptly shuts off. Developing systems to suppress or mitigate such disruptions is a challenge that builders of tokamaks like ITER, the international fusion experiment under construction in France, must face.

Stellarators had been the main line of fusion development in the 1950s and early 1960s before taking a back seat to tokamaks, whose symmetrical, doughnut-shaped magnetic field geometry produced good plasma confinement and proved easier to create. But breakthroughs in computing and physics understanding have revitalized interest in the twisty, cruller-shaped stellarator design and made it the subject of major experiments in Japan and Germany.

PPPL developed the QUASAR facility with both stellarators and tokamaks in mind. Tokamaks produce magnetic fields and a plasma shape that are the same all the way around the axis of the machine—a feature known as "axisymmetry." QUASAR is symmetrical too, but in a different way. While QUASAR was designed to produce a twisting and curving , the strength of that field varies gently as in a tokamak—hence the name "quasi-symmetry" (QS) for the design. This property of the field strength was to produce plasma confinement properties identical to those of tokamaks.

"If the predicted near-equivalence in the confinement physics can be validated experimentally," Neilson said, "then the development of the QS line may be able to continue as essentially a '3D tokamak.'"

Such development would test whether a QUASAR-like design could be a candidate for a demonstration—or DEMO —fusion facility that would pave the way for construction of a commercial fusion reactor that would generate electricity for the power grid.

Explore further: New imaging technique provides improved insight into controlling the plasma in fusion experiments

More information: Neilson, G.H.; Gates, D.A.; Heitzenroeder, P.J.; Breslau, J.; Prager, S.C.; Stevenson, T.; Titus, P.; Williams, M.D.; Zarnstorff, M.C., "Next Steps in Quasi-Axisymmetric Stellarator Research," Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions on , vol.42, no.3, pp.489,494, March 2014. DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2014.2298870

Related Stories

New technique for sustaining high-performance fusion plasmas

December 4, 2013

(Phys.org) —A multinational team led by Chinese researchers in collaboration with U.S. and European partners has successfully demonstrated a novel technique for suppressing instabilities that can cut short the life of controlled ...

Plasma experiment demonstrates admirable self-control

November 13, 2013

A team of Chinese and American scientists has learned how to maintain high fusion performance under steady conditions by exploiting a characteristic of the plasma itself: the plasma self-generates much of the electrical current ...

With lithium, more is definitely better

November 10, 2011

A team of scientists working at the U.S. Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) has found that increasing the amount of lithium coating in the wall of an experimental fusion reactor greatly improves ...

Recommended for you

Electron highway inside crystal

December 8, 2016

Physicists of the University of Würzburg have made an astonishing discovery in a specific type of topological insulators. The effect is due to the structure of the materials used. The researchers have now published their ...

Researchers improve qubit lifetime for quantum computers

December 8, 2016

An international team of scientists has succeeded in making further improvements to the lifetime of superconducting quantum circuits. An important prerequisite for the realization of high-performance quantum computers is ...

A nano-roundabout for light

December 8, 2016

Just like in normal road traffic, crossings are indispensable in optical signal processing. In order to avoid collisions, a clear traffic rule is required. A new method has now been developed at TU Wien to provide such a ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Z99
2.4 / 5 (5) Mar 31, 2014
Nice to know that completion of this, which was supposed to be years ago, will "advance" the subject of study. I guess that is compared to regressing it? Hey I got an idea! Why not spend hundreds of millions (or billions, IDK, the cost data aren't easily found in the shoddy journalism my search hit) of dollars to build something that MIGHT, just might, be "promising"? Compared to spending it on something which isn't promising, I guess?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.