US clean-air efforts stay on target, analysis shows

Mar 27, 2014
The Environmental Protection Agency regulates inhalable particles that can lodge in lung tissue and affect human health. Credit: EPA

National efforts in the last decade to clear the air of dangerous particulate matter have been so successful that most urban areas have already attained the next benchmark, according to new research by Rice University.

Atmospheric researchers at Rice studied the state implementation plans (SIPs) from 23 regions mandated by the Environmental Protection Agency to reduce particulate matter (PM) smaller than 2.5 microns (PM 2.5) to less than 15 micrograms per cubic meter by 2009.

The Rice analysis appears this week in the Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association.

All but one of the regions studied reported they had met the goal by deadline. States with regions that met the deadline included Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and West Virginia, as well as the District of Columbia. The final region, Alabama, reported attainment in 2010.

PM 2.5 concentrations in the nonattainment regions that filed SIPs to attain the standard by 2009 declined by an average 2.6 micrograms per cubic meter – significantly greater improvement than in regions that had attained the standard from its inception. The study showed PM reductions in the SIP regions were broadly spread, rather than pinpointed at the most polluted monitors.

"One of the things we were most interested in looking at was to see if states were cherry-picking their measures to meet the standard by reducing pollution at their worst monitors, compared with how much they were doing to bring down levels all across the region so that people were breathing cleaner air," said Daniel Cohan, an associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at Rice.

"It was encouraging to find that across the country, we have seen overall particulate-matter levels come down. We found very slight extra improvement at monitors that were targeted the most, but regions that had to develop plans achieved pretty solid controls that didn't just pinpoint the worst monitors. And the large populations of these regions benefited."

Cohan and Rice alumna Ran Chen also documented that continued to decline even after the 2009 standards were met. The majority of the SIP regions had already attained the mandated 2014 goal of 12 micrograms per cubic meter by 2012.

"We've been on a good trajectory," Cohan said. "This demonstrates that the combination of state and federal controls has been substantially improving air quality in the U.S."

Recent stories about the ongoing crisis in Beijing, where PM has reached hazardous levels, and in rapidly industrializing countries such as India set the U.S. efforts in sharp relief, Cohan said. The World Health Organization announced this month that about 7 million people die each year as a result of air pollution exposure.

Particulate matter consists of microscopic particles spewed into the air by vehicles and industry, as well as particles that form from pollutant gases. "Particulate matter is not a chemical, like ozone; it's a category, and it's a real challenge to figure out the origin of those particles," Cohan said. "Are they sulfates or carbons or nitrates? Each of these needs vastly different control approaches to make a difference."

PM also includes natural emissions from plants, volcanoes, forest fires and desert dust and can be blown across states or even continents.

The health community, Cohan said, has long expressed concerns about particulate matter in the atmosphere and determined in the 1990s that PM 2.5 particles can penetrate deeply into the lungs and cause heart attacks, decrease lung function and even cause premature death. The EPA found healthy people could experience symptoms from exposure to elevated levels of and set mandates for regions deemed in 1997 to be in "nonattainment" to file cleanup plans and follow through by 2009.

The study was the first to take a comprehensive, retrospective look at the overall effectiveness of SIPs for PM. A previous study by Cohan and alumnus Andrew Pegues conducted similar analysis of progress by states in achieving ozone standards.

Explore further: Cold nights, warm days trigger pollution alerts across France

More information: Paper: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10… .905509#.UzQw71zbQ7Q
EPA Particulate Matter page: epa.gov/air/particlepollution/

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Beijing issues rare air pollution alert

Feb 21, 2014

When the air gets really bad, Beijing says it has an emergency plan to yank half the city's cars off the road. The only problem is: It may be difficult to ever set that plan in motion.

Recommended for you

Indonesia to ratify ASEAN haze agreement

54 minutes ago

Indonesia's parliament on Tuesday voted to ratify a regional agreement on cross-border haze as fires ripped through forests in the west of the country, choking neighbouring Singapore with hazardous smog.

Study urges 15-year plan for low-carbon growth

3 hours ago

The world can save both financial and environmental costs by shifting toward a low-carbon economy over the next 15 years, a high-level panel said Tuesday ahead of a UN summit.

Specialized species critical for reefs

14 hours ago

One of Australia's leading coral reef ecologists fears that reef biodiversity may not provide the level of insurance for ecosystem survival that we once thought.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

The Shootist
not rated yet Mar 28, 2014
As we intentionally hobble ourselves for the benefit of China, India and the rest of the third world. We will be clean but they will burn so much and dirtier that all our efforts will be for naught.
Mike_Massen
not rated yet Mar 28, 2014
The Shootist being normally negative & not thinking like a leader
As we intentionally hobble ourselves for the benefit of China, India and the rest of the third world. We will be clean but they will burn so much and dirtier that all our efforts will be for naught.
So, The Shootist claims we are 'hobbled' by better air quality, less respiratory issues - cancers, when you should know cost of improving air quality is not high - Eg. recall the advent of catalytic convertors ?

The rest of the world is following suit, they are overcoming Inertia, in any case during that period the atmosphere has a few neat ways to reduce particulate levels as Eg air moves from China to west coast USA...

Similarly in Australia, we have great air quality west coast despite fact air comes from India & Africa considered as traditional 3rd world countries with high pollution levels.

Ponder The Shootist, needs to think more globally as a leader not a grumbling miserable follower needing an intellect...
Anda
not rated yet Mar 28, 2014
Also the shootist seems to ignore the fact that "the great leader" has declared war to contamination. China has entered a new phase and will obtain results fast (don't contaminate or we shot you down) ... it will work you'll see.

And the article is about urban areas. That's not where you burn your coal is it?