Many young adults show more cruelty on Facebook than in everyday life

February 18, 2014

Dr Val Hooper, an associate professor and head of Victoria's School of Information Management, guided student research, in which young people aged between 18 and 20 were interviewed to determine what behaviour they regarded as acceptable and unacceptable in social networking.

A large number of respondents admitted that they gauge what is acceptable behaviour online by watching and copying others.

"They will try something and then watch to see to what extent their Facebook friends sanction their behaviour—the reaction they receive determines how they develop their norms of interaction," says Dr Hooper.

Most respondents believed there were differences between the way people behaved offline and on Facebook. The protection of the computer screen and the ability to talk to someone without seeing their facial expressions meant that people felt freer to say what they wanted without worrying about the immediate consequences.

"If you post something hurtful you don't see the hurt in the recipient's eyes," says Dr Hooper. "You also have time to think about how to word your post to have the most powerful impact."

Dr Hooper is concerned about the implications of an online world that does not have strong guidelines in terms of behavioural norms.

"There is potential for what happens online to spin off into the offline environment—in fact we have seen evidence that it is happening. If young people become accustomed to bullying people online, what is to stop them becoming more violent offline as well?"

The study also showed Facebook to offer many benefits, especially for who are striving to establish their identity as young adults. Positive experiences respondents mentioned included being able to catch up with old friends, getting to know people better, and meeting new people.

Most of the respondents' negative experiences were associated with security, privacy and undesirable postings. For instance, the majority of respondents indicated that they didn't want to see information that was too personal, particularly problems and private information such as explicit romantic and sexual details.

People also felt an obligation to befriend people they would normally avoid offline—with many confessing that they had Facebook friends they actually didn't like.

"This has raised some interesting questions that would be worthwhile to explore further," says Dr Hooper. "For instance, if we are supposedly freer online, why is there an obligation to accept unappealing friendship invitations?"

Explore further: 'Dislikes' fail to keep people off Facebook: survey

Related Stories

New mums shun Twitter and stick to baby-friendly Facebook

February 7, 2014

Although it might sometimes seem that your Facebook feed is overrun with chatter about babies, research from Microsoft has suggested that mums actually spend less time on the site after they have had children. And while the ...

Recommended for you

Roboticists learn to teach robots from babies

December 1, 2015

Babies learn about the world by exploring how their bodies move in space, grabbing toys, pushing things off tables and by watching and imitating what adults are doing.

Xbox gaming technology may improve X-ray precision

December 1, 2015

With the aim of producing high-quality X-rays with minimal radiation exposure, particularly in children, researchers have developed a new approach to imaging patients. Surprisingly, the new technology isn't a high-tech, high-dollar ...

Making 3-D imaging 1,000 times better

December 1, 2015

MIT researchers have shown that by exploiting the polarization of light—the physical phenomenon behind polarized sunglasses and most 3-D movie systems—they can increase the resolution of conventional 3-D imaging devices ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (1) Feb 18, 2014
If young people become accustomed to bullying people online, what is to stop them becoming more violent offline as well?

The same thing that keeps them from bullying people offline, reactions, consequences, punishment. Such messed up logic, just trying to scare people into believing him.

For instance, if we are supposedly freer online, why is there an obligation to accept unappealing friendship invitations

For the same reason, real life consequences. A person you might avoid offline could approach you if you reject them online, so you just accept the invite and be done with it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.