Small farmers in developing countries benefiting significantly from genetically modified crops

February 19, 2014

Despite the proclamations of the so-called "organic" movement and the anti-industry activists, small farmers in developing countries are benefiting significantly from genetically modified crops, according to a large review of the peer-reviewed research literature by US consultants. Writing in the International Journal of Biotechnology, Janet Carpenter of JE Carpenter Consulting LLC in Boylston, Massachusetts explains how they see improvements in health, education, debt repayment, maternal care services and food security.

The primary research literature tends to focus on the technology itself and the business aspects of the development and deployment of GM crops. However, there is also a substantial number of papers that have detail investigations of the broader set of socio-economic impacts, which has provided Carpenter with the necessary resources to conclude that, "The results of the available literature show that the impacts of the technology are multi-faceted and ripple through local and national economies."

  • While proportions vary, the literature show GM farmers receive a large share of the benefits. When prices change, consumers benefit from lower prices.
  • Smaller farms in many countries benefit from adoption of GM crops in some cases more than big farms.
  • The few studies that considered household income show greater increases among lower-income farmers in adopting GM crops.
  • Labor requirements are often cut by reduced spraying and tillage but increased by greater crop yields.
  • In studies of social welfare, GM adopters report improvements in health, education, debt repayment, maternal care services and .

Explore further: What farmers think about GM crops

More information: Carpenter J.E. (2013). "The socio-economic impacts of currently commercialised genetically engineered crops," International Journal of Biotechnology, 12 (4) 249. DOI: 10.1504/IJBT.2013.059248

Related Stories

What farmers think about GM crops

February 24, 2008

Farmers are upbeat about genetically modified crops, according to new research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).

Critical consumers do often buy genetically modified food

October 15, 2013

Many people disapprove of genetically modified food. You would therefore expect them to avoid these products in supermarkets. Dutch researchers at TU Delft have revealed that by no means all European consumers put that theory ...

Bangladesh releases first GM food

January 24, 2014

Authorities in Bangladesh have released the country's first ever genetically modified crop to farmers amid criticism from environmental groups, officials said Friday.

Closely-watched GM farm case begins in Australia

February 11, 2014

An Australian farmer who lost his organic produce licence has taken his neighbour to court over contamination from his genetically modified canola crop in a closely-watched test case.

Recommended for you

Study suggests fish can experience 'emotional fever'

November 25, 2015

(—A small team of researchers from the U.K. and Spain has found via lab study that at least one type of fish is capable of experiencing 'emotional fever,' which suggests it may qualify as a sentient being. In their ...

A huge chunk of a tardigrade's genome comes from foreign DNA

November 23, 2015

Researchers from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have sequenced the genome of the nearly indestructible tardigrade, the only animal known to survive the extreme environment of outer space, and found something ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Feb 20, 2014
Someone needs to check the facts before publishing articles like this. More than 70% of global food production comes from small no GMO and organic farms globally using 30% of the agricultural landmass and enough food is produced globally to feed 14 billion people. So why do we have false claims like the above and why do we have GMO technology when it is clearly not needed? The answer is simple.
We all need to eat. Its worth the investment to seize control of all the food by inserting patented genes into every food type to ensure continued payments above the going rates and the continued marginalisation of conventional/organic crops through contamination and ultimately court cases suing for the intellectual property rights of the corporations, despite it being they who contaminated the non GMO crops. The laws are twisted in the corporations favour all the time. In the end there will be no non-GMO food available anywhere. It has never been tested in long term human feeding trials either.
not rated yet Mar 03, 2014
Kev_C, Where is your source for the data you cite (peer-reviewed please)?
Mar 03, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.