Small drones hit US regulatory turbulence

Feb 14, 2014 by Robert Macpherson
A small remote-controlled drone hovers in the sky at a meet-up of the DC Area Drone User Group on February 1, 2014

Hovering like mechanical sparrows over a windswept Maryland field on a bright Saturday afternoon, small drones seem harmless—but they are at the center of an ardent dogfight over US regulations.

Every few weeks, members of the 800-strong DC Area Drone Users Group gather to fly their remote-controlled and discuss the ways they could be put to good civilian use.

"The applications are endless," said German expat Peter Schloemer, 57, after flying a Multirotor, a black octocopter that resembles an insect, around the hilltop with compatriot Uwe Doergeloh, 41.

"Anything you can use a helicopter for today, you can use a ."

Imaginations run wild, with visions of lightweight drones spraying and watering crops, inspecting damaged high-rise buildings, identifying pipeline leaks and searching for lost children.

"We're not just about technology itself, but how technology can be used to make the world a better place," said Tim Reuter, the founder of the Washington area group.

But no sooner does a drone get off the ground than it flies into red tape.

Strict US drone guidelines

Guidelines set by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) limit drone flying to 400 feet (120 meters) above the ground—about 150 feet less than the height of the Washington Monument—and clear of airports.

The FAA also strictly forbids the use of drones for what it deems to be commercial purposes, although it grants exemptions for government and law enforcement use.

Last year, the FAA fined Swiss drone pioneer Raphael Pirker, alias Trappy, $10,000 for flying "in a careless or reckless manner" when he used a Ritewing Zephyr drone to record a bird's eye view of the University of Virginia.

A drone flying enthusiast works on his drone during a DC Area Drone User Group meet-up on February 1, 2014
A drone flying enthusiast works on his drone during a DC Area Drone User Group meet-up on February 1, 2014

Pirker is challenging the "notice of proposed assessment," his lawyer Brendan Schulman said, in what small-drone enthusiasts see as a test case of how far the US government is ready to go to regulate their activities.

More recently, the FAA slapped the wrists of a Minnesota craft brewer for making a YouTube video, seen nearly 450,000 times, of a skeletal hexacopter airlifting a case of lager to an ice-fishing hut in the middle of a frozen lake.

"They said it was not recreational, and that even though we were not taking money from the people we were delivering beer to, it was still commercial because we were profiting from the use of the video," Jack Supple, chief creative officer of Lakemaid Beer, told Fox News.

Online retailing giant Amazon whipped up publicity in the run-up to Christmas with a similar video promoting a "Prime Air" 30-minute mini-drone delivery service that it said was in development.

Drones are big business

The Teal Group puts the potential worldwide market for drones of all sizes at $89 billion over the next 10 years, with armed forces representing the biggest single market segment, Phil Finnegan, director of corporate analysis at the Washington area aerospace consulting firm, told AFP.

A small drone hovers in the sky during a meet-up of the DC Area Drone User Group on February 1, 2014

But this past week, the FAA said it would not meet an end-of-2015 deadline for fresh regulations enabling civilian drones to safely share the skies with private and commercial aircraft—and when regulations do come, it will be in stages.

"We won't get to a point where there will be one day where suddenly everyone can operate anything, anytime," FAA chief Michael Huerta said.

"But as we go through the certification and qualification process, there will be classes of these aircraft that we will be able to introduce."

This has frustrated members of the DC Area Drone Users Group, who say that small drones are already being put to practical use in places like Germany, for photojournalism, and Japan, for agricultural surveys.

A small remote-controlled drone hovers in the sky at the DC Area Drone User Group meet-up on February 1, 2014

"We're letting other countries get ahead of us," said Reuter, who in just a month raised $545,000 via Kickstarter to put into production, by mid-2014, a three-rotor "microcopter" called the AirDroids Pocket Drone that can carry a GoPro camera, yet fold down to the size of an iPad.

Christopher Vo, a 29-year-old doctorate student in computer science and robotics at George Mason University in Virginia, said he uses the three quadracopters he brought to the recent Maryland meet-up for research purposes.

But he added: "If they start (permanently) banning commercial use, it might raise a lot of questions when I take them out into the field for research."

The Drone User Group Network, with 3,000 members worldwide, is now welcoming entries for a $10,000 Drone Social Impact Award for "the most socially beneficial, documented use of a low-cost drone."

And more than 120 teams from 27 countries have already entered a contest to come up with a drone to combat the poaching of endangered rhinos in South Africa's Kruger National Park.

A small drone hovers in the sky during a meet-up of the DC Area Drone User Group on February 1, 2014

Such concepts could help reshape the public image of drones, which many associate with $4 million Predators striking terror targets overseas or Big Brother surveillance of Americans' private lives by law enforcement.

Telecoms engineer Hocine Chebili, 54, says he can see public acceptance grow every time he takes his remote-control hexacopter out for a whirl.

"Most people are very receptive," he said. "When they see it, they don't have the negative impression that they have with . It's like a toy."

Explore further: Drone use highlights questions for journalists

More information: On the web: www.dugn.org , www.wcuavc.com , www.faa.gov , www.lakemaidbeer.com

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Drone use highlights questions for journalists

Feb 12, 2014

As police responded to a deadly car crash, they noticed an increasingly familiar sight: a remote-controlled aircraft, equipped with a video camera, hovering over the wreckage.

Amazon drone technology almost there, regulation nonexistent

Dec 05, 2013

For Amazon's recently announced drone delivery system to get off the ground, the company will have to solve numerous difficult technological challenges. Chief among them will be increasing battery life, getting the drone ...

Commercial use of drones has already taken flight

Dec 11, 2013

The camera swoops over the green expanse of the Everglades hundreds of feet below, like many helicopter shots you've seen on television. But suddenly it dips and flies through a narrow, shaded canal where kayakers are paddling, ...

Recommended for you

Nanoscience makes your wine better

22 hours ago

One sip of a perfectly poured glass of wine leads to an explosion of flavours in your mouth. Researchers at Aarhus University, Denmark, have now developed a nanosensor that can mimic what happens in your ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antialias_physorg
not rated yet Feb 14, 2014
with visions of lightweight drones spraying and watering crops

That seems like an awesome idea. Instead of having big tractors going up and down fields (and running over a part of the plants in the process). Each field could have an inexpensive drone, a smallish solar panel to recharge it and a place to put a container (water or pesticide) from which it would refill itself and water/spray plants as needed.
If you equip it with an infrared sensor it could even prevent accidentally spraing wildlife (or any human dumb enough to walk through a field)
bearly
5 / 5 (1) Feb 14, 2014
If 100 years ago we had the government we have now Henry Ford and Thomas Edison would have been fined and or arrested for endangering society. Damn I am tired of "big brother" sticking his nose where it doesn't belong. FREEDOM !
Osteta
Feb 14, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
rjflory
not rated yet Feb 14, 2014
I wonder why so many sources keep mis-quoting the 400ft limit. This limit applies to "government public safety agencies" (FAA section 334.c.2.C.ii).

Section 336 ("Special Rule For Model Aircraft") applies to civilians (recreational-use *only*), and basically restates many of the existing rules governing Radio-Controlled model aircraft in the public airspace. For us civilians, the 400ft limit applies only within 3 miles of an airport (AMA A.2.c), which makes obvious sense.

If we fly responsibly (away from airports, people, and property), we can hopefully prevent a lot of bad press and reduce misunderstandings that could lead to unnecessary, hastily-imposed knee-jerk over-regulation.