Radar images of near-Earth asteroid 2006 DP14

Feb 26, 2014 by Dc Agle
This image is one frame from a collage of radar images taken on Feb. 11, 2014, of near-Earth asteroid 2006 DP 14, which is about 1,300 feet (400 meters) long. The imaging used the 230-foot (70-meter) Deep Space Network antenna at Goldstone, Calif., while the asteroid was about 11 times farther from Earth than the moon is. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/GSSR

A collage of radar images of near-Earth asteroid 2006 DP14 was generated by NASA scientists using the 230-foot (70-meter) Deep Space Network antenna at Goldstone, Calif., on the night of Feb. 11, 2014.

Delay-Doppler radar imaging revealed that the is about 1,300 feet (400 meters) long, 660 feet (200 meters) wide, and shaped somewhat like a big peanut. The asteroid's period of rotation is about six hours. The asteroid is of a type known as a "contact binary" because it has two large lobes on either end that appear to be in contact. Previous radar data from Goldstone and the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico has shown that at least 10 percent of near-Earth asteroids larger than about 650 feet (200 meters) have contact binary shapes like that of 2006 DP14. The data were obtained over an interval of 2.5 hours as the asteroid completed about half a revolution. The resolution is about 60 feet (19 meters) per pixel.

The data were obtained on Feb. 11 between 9:03 a.m. and 11:27 p.m. PST (12:03 a.m. to 2:27 a.m. EST on Feb. 12). At the time of the observations, the asteroid's distance was about 2.6 million miles (4.2 million kilometers) from Earth. That is about 11 times the average distance between Earth and its moon. The asteroid's closest approach to Earth occurred on Feb. 10, at a distance of about 1.5 million miles (2.4 million kilometers).

Radar is a powerful technique for studying an asteroid's size, shape, rotation state, surface features and surface roughness, and for improving the calculation of asteroid orbits. Radar measurements of asteroid distances and velocities often enable computation of asteroid orbits much further into the future than if radar observations weren't available.

NASA places a high priority on tracking asteroids and protecting our home planet from them. In fact, the United States has the most robust and productive survey and detection program for discovering near-Earth objects. To date, U.S. assets have discovered more than 98 percent of the known near-Earth objects.

In addition to the resources NASA puts into understanding asteroids, it also partners with other U.S. government agencies, university-based astronomers, and space science institutes across the country that are working to track and understand these objects better, often with grants, interagency transfers and other contracts from NASA.

NASA's Near-Earth Object Program at NASA Headquarters, Washington, manages and funds the search, study and monitoring of asteroids and comets whose orbits periodically bring them close to Earth. JPL manages the Near-Earth Object Program Office for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington. JPL is a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.

Explore further: Radar images of asteroid 2005 WK4

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Goldstone radar snags images of asteroid 2013 ET

Mar 19, 2013

(Phys.org) —A sequence of radar images of asteroid 2013 ET was obtained on March 10, 2013, by NASA scientists using the 230-foot (70-meter) Deep Space Network antenna at Goldstone, Calif., when the asteroid ...

Radar images of asteroid 2005 WK4

Aug 22, 2013

(Phys.org) —A collage of radar images of near-Earth asteroid 2005 WK4 was generated by NASA scientists using the 230-foot (70-meter) Deep Space Network antenna at Goldstone, Calif., on Aug. 8, 2013.

Massive asteroid with moon to pass Earth today

May 31, 2013

An asteroid nearly two miles (three kilometers) wide is set to pass by Earth Friday with no risk of impact, offering scientists a rare chance to study a massive flying object with its own moon.

Radar movies highlight asteroid 1998 QE2 and its moon

Jun 07, 2013

(Phys.org) —Scientists working with NASA's 230-foot-wide (70-meter) Deep Space Network antenna at Goldstone, Calif., have released a second, longer, more refined movie clip of asteroid 1998 QE2 and its ...

NASA radar images asteroid 2007 PA8

Nov 06, 2012

(Phys.org)—Scientists working with NASA's 230-foot-wide (70-meter) Deep Space Network antenna at Goldstone, Calif., have obtained several radar images depicting near-Earth asteroid 2007 PA8. The images ...

Nine radar images of asteroid 2007 PA8

Nov 27, 2012

(Phys.org)—A collage shows nine radar images of near-Earth asteroid 2007 PA8 that were obtained between Oct. 31 and Nov. 13, 2012, with data collected by NASA's 230-foot-wide (70-meter) Deep Space Network ...

Recommended for you

Telescope tech using membrane optics moves to Phase 2

1 hour ago

(Phys.org) —The United States military's advanced research arm (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA) never bored with the topic of finding smaller, less expensive launch vehicles, is now ...

How far are the planets from the Sun?

20 hours ago

The eight planets in our solar system each occupy their own orbits around the Sun. They orbit the star in ellipses, which means their distance to the sun varies depending on where they are in their orbits. ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lex Talonis
1 / 5 (6) Feb 26, 2014
What a bullshit trip NASA and the rest of the wankers are.

"NASA places a high priority on tracking asteroids and protecting our home planet from them"

Ok so they spot a big one coming straight in and then what?

Run outside with the magic devil scaring crosses and scream up into the dark night sky, "Get thee my behind satan?"

Yeah fuck yeahhhhh - and then what?

While some 18,000 nuclear weapons sit around ticking away... in their silos, in their bunkers and in their launchers... doing nothing.

No ICBM's being modified for deep space, long range missions - like to Marrs and beyond..., with solar panels and loads of manovering fuels, and all the neato radiation protection of it's innards..

Nothing... but hands on our cocks protection from NASA... "Oooo - There is one! Run!" "To where?" "The basement?" "But that will be a 20 trillion, billion megaton blast - it will put a hole in the side off the planet." "Oooo pull a blanket over your head." "Will it help?" "No."
GSwift7
5 / 5 (2) Feb 27, 2014
Ok so they spot a big one coming straight in and then what?


At least we could build some kind of time capsule monument type thing, so that if anyone ever discovers our remains, we might be able to let them know what happened to us.

Seriously though, if it was a really big one, there wouldn't be much anyone could do, but a medium sized one maybe we could. Depending on what direction it was coming from and how much time we had, there's always a few rockets in the pipeline that could be launched in a relatively short period of time, in an emergency.

Actually building some kind of interceptor rocket ahead of time would almost certainly be a wasted effort. Without knowing specifics about what you would need, you'd almost certainly have to build something at the last minute anyway. Different trajectories and such will radically change the type of interceptor you would want to build. You almost have no choice but to wait until you discover a threat before you know what to build.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (1) Feb 27, 2014
While some 18,000 nuclear weapons sit around ticking away... in their silos, in their bunkers and in their launchers... doing nothing.
No ICBM's being modified for deep space, long range missions - like to Marrs and beyond

@Lex Talonis
well, there is no guarantee that just hitting an asteroid with a nuke (or even multiple nukes) would prevent said asteroid from hitting Earth, for starters.
read up a little more. this article is interesting:

http://news.disco...1116.htm

What a bullshit trip NASA and the rest of the wankers are

this comment, however, is personal conjecture and only goes to show your ignorance

should you wish to spout opinion, perhaps you should start a blog? this is a science site, if you are going to make a comment, either do the math or provide empirical data.
GSwift7
4 / 5 (4) Feb 27, 2014
no guarantee that just hitting an asteroid with a nuke (or even multiple nukes)


Besides that, nukes aren't really very effective in space. Most of the energy of a nuke is delivered in the form of visible light. That works fine in the Earth's atmosphere, where it creates a shock wave of air pressure, but wouldn't do much in space. Ever seen how a hydrogen bomb will peel paint off things like ships in the blast zone, and burn shadows into background objects, but leave things like swing sets in one piece? I don't think scorching one side of an asteroid is likely to do much to change its trajectory. Maybe you could somehow light off the nuke in a confined space, and thereby launch an impactor or use a penetrator to get it inside the asteroid before it detonates? The trick is that you're looking for inertia transfer, and a nuke wastes too much of its energy into empty space.
Lex Talonis
1 / 5 (3) Feb 27, 2014
"NASA places a high priority on tracking asteroids and protecting our home planet from them"

And yes? Protecting us with WHAT?

The reason why I am the brightest scientist in the entire history of our species, is because I know how to destroy asteroids with nukes - especially the big ones and your don't.

So shut your idiot face.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (2) Feb 27, 2014
The reason why I am the brightest scientist in the entire history of our species, is because I know how to destroy asteroids with nukes - especially the big ones and your don't.

So shut your idiot face

@Lex Talonis
until you can provide empirical data backing up this claim, there is no reason to assume that you are anything but a SPAMMING TROLL looking for a cheap thrill by acting the moron on a science site.

What are you, 12?
And yes? Protecting us with WHAT?

they are attempting to develop new technology
here is just ONE link... https://en.wikipe..._tractor

they've been publishing articles on Phys.org since AT LEAST 2009 on possible ways to protect earth...

either do some homework and provide links/proof to support your stance or we are going to tell your mom to take your internet away.
Maggnus
5 / 5 (2) Feb 27, 2014
What a bullshit trip NASA and the rest of the wankers are.
http://arstechnic...sadists/
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (2) Feb 27, 2014
What a bullshit trip NASA and the rest of the wankers are.
http://arstechnic...sadists/

@Maggnus

link didnt work

trying to post this one?

http://arstechnic...sadists/

GOOD LINK! THANKS

More news stories

ESA's weightless plants fly on a Dragon

(Phys.org) —It is a race against time for ESA's Gravi-2 experiment following launch last Friday on the Dragon space ferry. Stowed in Dragon's cargo are lentil seeds that will be nurtured into life on the ...

In the 'slime jungle' height matters

(Phys.org) —In communities of microbes, akin to 'slime jungles', cells evolve not just to grow faster than their rivals but also to push themselves to the surface of colonies where they gain the best access ...

Robot scouts rooms people can't enter

(Phys.org) —Firefighters, police officers and military personnel are often required to enter rooms with little information about what dangers might lie behind the door. A group of engineering students at ...

New alfalfa variety resists ravenous local pest

(Phys.org) —Cornell plant breeders have released a new alfalfa variety with some resistance against the alfalfa snout beetle, which has ravaged alfalfa fields in nine northern New York counties and across ...