Moon rocks reveal surprising meteorite history

Feb 13, 2014 by Michelle Wheeler
A/Prof Nemchin's discovery challenges the long-held view that there was a single spike in huge meteorite impacts 3.9 billion years ago. Credit: PictureWendy

A WA geologist analyzing lunar rock samples collected during the Apollo missions has uncovered evidence of a huge meteorite strike 4.2 billion years ago.

Curtin University Associate Professor Alexander Nemchin made the discovery when he dated a section of from the Moon that melted in heat of the meteorite impact.

The object that hit the Moon was probably tens of kilometers across and would have left a crater several hundred kilometers wide.

A/Prof Nemchin says the strike happened at least 300 million years before the youngest known lunar impact basins and his discovery challenges the long-held view that there was a single spike in huge impacts 3.9 billion years ago.

He says this period of intense meteorite bombardment, which would have affected both the Moon and the Earth, was previously thought to be a one-off event.

"A few years ago we started to see evidence that it's probably not quite the case," A/Prof Nemchin says.

"It's possible that there are some impacts not related to this 3.9 [billion years] spike … there are some that happened much earlier.

"It has implications for a number of things including how life evolved on Earth."

A/Prof Nemchin analysed the rock using an ion probe instrument at Curtin University known as SHRIMP, which allows researchers to determine the age of tiny amounts of rock by examining the atoms that make up the sample.

He was able to borrow the rock, which was collected from the rim of North Ray crater during the Apollo 16 mission, because of NASA's relatively open approach to the use of moon rocks for scientific research.

"All you need is to have record of doing scientific research, you need to demonstrate that you've got a way to keep the samples safe and you know how to work with small, rare samples," A/Prof Nemchin says.

"It's really very open in many ways."

A/Prof Nemchin says currently the best explanation for any increase in throughout the Solar System 3.9 billion years ago is that some planets were thought to be displaced from their normal orbits at that time.

He says the movement of Jupiter and Saturn, with their huge mass, destabilised Neptune and sent smaller asteroids and comets "randomly flying around" in the Solar System.

"Of course when they go all over the place they start hitting all the other planets," A/Prof Nemchin says.

Explore further: Team uncovers secrets of Mars' birth from unique meteorite

Related Stories

Curtin geologists make a 'shocking' discovery

Jan 24, 2012

Research led by Curtin University geologists has uncovered a wealth of new evidence in the mineral zircon from lunar rock samples recovered during NASA’s Apollo missions, revealing indisputable proof ...

Scientists find Moon, asteroids share history

Mar 25, 2013

(Phys.org) —NASA and international researchers have discovered that Earth's moon has more in common than previously thought with large asteroids roaming our solar system.

Water hidden in the Moon may have proto-Earth origin

Sep 10, 2013

Water found in ancient Moon rocks might have actually originated from the proto-Earth and even survived the Moon-forming event. Latest research into the amount of water within lunar rocks returned during ...

Lunar scientists shed light on Moon's impact history

Feb 28, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of researchers from the NASA Lunar Science Institute (NLSI) at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif., have discovered that debris that caused a "lunar cataclysm" on the moon ...

Recommended for you

Cassini sees sunny seas on Titan

19 hours ago

(Phys.org) —As it soared past Saturn's large moon Titan recently, NASA's Cassini spacecraft caught a glimpse of bright sunlight reflecting off hydrocarbon seas.

Is space tourism safe or do civilians risk health effects?

22 hours ago

Several companies are developing spacecraft designed to take ordinary citizens, not astronauts, on short trips into space. "Space tourism" and short periods of weightlessness appear to be safe for most individuals ...

An unmanned rocket exploded. So what?

Oct 30, 2014

Sputnik was launched more than 50 years ago. Since then we have seen missions launched to Mercury, Mars and to all the planets within the solar system. We have sent a dozen men to the moon and many more to ...

NASA image: Sunrise from the International Space Station

Oct 30, 2014

NASA astronaut Reid Wiseman posted this image of a sunrise, captured from the International Space Station, to social media on Oct. 29, 2014. Wiseman wrote, "Not every day is easy. Yesterday was a tough one. ...

Copernicus operations secured until 2021

Oct 30, 2014

In a landmark agreement for Europe's Copernicus programme, the European Commission and ESA have signed an Agreement of over €3 billion to manage and implement the Copernicus 'space component' between 2014 ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

SnowballSolarSystem _SSS_
1 / 5 (1) Feb 21, 2014
This finding may represent the first in a late-heavy bombardment (LHB) double pulse as the solar-system barycenter between the Sun and a former companion star overtook Uranus around 4.2 Ga followed by Neptune around 3.9 Ga. Only a former binary companion star spiraling out into the Oort cloud could explain a Hills cloud (Inner Oort cloud) with more angular momentum than the planets that supposed hurled them out there: scratch the Nice model.
Captain Stumpy
not rated yet Feb 21, 2014
This finding may represent the first in a late-heavy bombardment (LHB) double pulse as the solar-system barycenter between the Sun and a former companion star overtook Uranus around 4.2 Ga followed by Neptune around 3.9 Ga. Only a former binary companion star spiraling out into the Oort cloud could explain a Hills cloud (Inner Oort cloud) with more angular momentum than the planets that supposed hurled them out there: scratch the Nice model.

@SnowballSolarSystem _SSS_
is there ANY empirical data to back up your claims?
any REPUTABLE science?
ANYTHING that can be considered a peer reviewed study?
P.s. leave out the EU sites and all that, as that is pesudoscience and not a legitimate resource unless you are talking cults or religious organizations

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.