Transfer of knowledge learned seen as a key to improving science education

Feb 16, 2014

Attendees of a workshop at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science will be immersed into "active learning," an approach inspired by national reports targeting U.S. science education, in general, and, more specifically, the 60 percent dropout rate of students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM).

"The goal of this session is to take many ideas around improving education that are out there and make them applicable to the classroom," says Eleanor "Elly" V.H. Vandegrift, associate director of the University of Oregon's Science Literacy Program and workshop co-organizer. "My hope is that anybody who comes to this workshop will find something that they can take home and use immediately in the classroom."

The three-hour session, "Thinking Skills for the 21st Century: Teaching for Transfer," will focus on how science students learn material, but, more importantly, how well they transfer the concepts they've learned into their next class—in the same or a different discipline—or into their jobs. Interested faculty who attend the session will be updated on instructional approaches that help nurture such transfer, and they will spend time engaged in individual and small group activities.

Transfer starts with good teaching, says Vandegrift, whose UO program is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. "I think what happens a lot of times in traditional classrooms is that when students sit and just listen to a lecture, they are not processing the information."

The impetus for the workshop emerged from three reports: "Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century," produced by the National Research Council and published in 2012 as a book by the National Academy of Sciences; "Engage to Excel" (2012) by the President's Council on Advisors in Science and Technology to improve both K-12 and undergraduate college education; and 2011's "Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education, A Call to Action," that emerged from a National Science Foundation-supported conference organized by AAAS. (Links to the three reports are provided below.)

Each of four presenters will provide brief remarks built around activities designed to engage the attendees. Vandegrift will discuss the development of learning outcomes and objectives that can be measured. Her hands-on work sample will be a large poster that participants will study and apply Post-it notes to show how their own ideas may relate to other people's ideas.

Vandegrift's portion follow the session-opener by Amy B. Mulnix, a cell biologist at Earlham College in Richmond, Ind., on her implementation of active learning after realizing that her students were not learning as expected. Mulnix will detail her experience and address what teaching for transfer really means.

Following Vandegrift will be physicist S. Raj Chaudhury, associate director of the Biggio Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning at Auburn University, and Jennifer R. Yates, a neuroscientist at Ohio Wesleyan University.

Chaudhury's portion of the workshop will focus on new ways to use clicker technology to help students apply principles learned in the classroom to new situations. Yates will present a case study of an effort that went awry in a group situation as part her focus on "Creating Opportunities for Practice-with-Feedback."

"Research has shown that students retain information longer if they have opportunities to practice with it," Vandegrift said. "This what I mean about transfer. There are many ways a faculty member can give students an opportunity to practice with the content. The ideas of how people learn are applicable across disciplines. The focus right now is on science."

Explore further: IUPUI faculty and undergrad researchers evaluate peer-led team learning in cyberspace

More information: Relevant links:

UO Science Literacy Program: scilit.uoregon.edu/
About Vandegrift: scilit.uoregon.edu/Administration_profiles.html
About Mulnix: www.earlham.edu/biochemistry/f… ername=amymul&r=3353
About Chaudhury and the Biggio Center: wp.auburn.edu/biggio/biggio-staff/
About Yates: psychology.owu.edu/YatesJennifer.html
Report, Education for Life and Work: www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13398
Engage to Excel: www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defau… fact_sheet_final.pdf
Vision and Change: visionandchange.org/

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Improve learning by taming instructional complexity

Nov 21, 2013

From using concrete or abstract materials to giving immediate or delayed feedback, there are rampant debates over the best teaching strategies to use. But, in reality, improving education is not as simple as choosing one ...

Recommended for you

Power can corrupt even the honest

53 minutes ago

When appointing a new leader, selectors base their choice on several factors and typically look for leaders with desirable characteristics such as honesty and trustworthiness. However once leaders are in power, can we trust ...

Learning at 10 degrees north

1 hour ago

Secluded beaches, calypso music and the entertaining carnival are often what come to mind when thinking of the islands of Trinidad and Tobago. But Dal Earth Sciences students might first consider Trinidad's ...

How to find the knowns and unknowns in any research

3 hours ago

Have you ever felt overloaded by information? Ever wondered how to make sense of claims and counter-claims about a topic? With so much information out there on many different issues, how is a person new to ...

Minorities energize US consumer market, according to report

3 hours ago

The buying power of minority groups in the U.S. has reached new heights and continues to outpace cumulative inflation, according to the latest Multicultural Economy Report from the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Porgie
not rated yet Feb 16, 2014
One problem is the speed at which a student is required to absorb certain subjects. Slower learning of difficult subjects and concepts is not a valid indicator of real ability in the long run. Allowing students to fully master difficult concepts and fundamentals in math and science can pay big dividends and reduce the failure and drop out rates. All to often a blanket assumption of fundamental knowledge is taken for granted. Key concepts, key procedures are skimmed by all knowing and busy professors. Breaking up early requirements of algebra, geometry and trig into bite sized classes that could be repeated without catastrophic impact on a students progress rather than requiring the student rush on into more difficult concepts with cursory knowledge, should be considered.