Study finds GPA more important than standardized tests

Feb 27, 2014 by James Richards
Credit: JC559

A study released in early February de-emphasized the role of standardized test scores in relation to graduation rates and college GPAs, calling into question the mandated submission of these tests when applying to some colleges. But while the University currently requires applicants submit either ACT or SAT scores, there are no plans on changing the admission requirements any time soon.

The study, titled "Defining Promise: Optional Standardized Testing Policies in American College and University Admissions," examined 33 universities with optional submission policies for . It found no significant differences in either cumulative GPA or between submitters and non-submitters.

The University requires freshmen applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores, according to the University's Undergraduate Admissions site. More than 800 four-year universities around the country do not require applicants submit SAT or ACT scores, including LSU-Alexandria and the University of Texas at Austin.

The Board of Regents sets the standardized test for the University, said David Kurpius, interim associate vice chancellor for Enrollment Management. He said the University uses standardized test scores as a way to counteract the varying quality of high schools, which can influence GPA.

Kurpius said the board will likely not change admissions standards in the near future, as the board tends to take time and serious thought about such wide-reaching changes.

Kurpius said the study did not use data from the University, and said enrollment management would likely run the study using their data sometime in the future.

Physics freshman Shelby Hust said standardized tests are not good for measuring specific subject knowledge, but provide an even playing field everyone can prepare for fairly equally. She said things like passion for internships and opportunities for research aren't accurately measured by standardized tests.

The study found optional testing policies can help increase diversity and provide "broader access to higher education." Non-submitters were more likely to be minorities, first-generation students, Pell Grant recipients, women and students with learning differences.

Herman Kelly, adjunct instructor in the College of Human Sciences and Education, said standardized tests provide a limited view of collegiate candidates. He said standardized tests only measure if somebody is a good test taker, and colleges should look for more well-rounded students, as opposed to focusing on scores.

A university could put more weight on a student's grades in high school, writing sample, references and extracurricular activities, Kelly said

Kelly also said cultural biases can influence how certain groups do on the tests. He said he thinks standardized tests make a college education available to more affluent families and "the elite," rather than providing education for all.

Affluent families also have the resources to learn strategies to take standardized tests independent of the material being tested, Kelly said. Some families can't afford to hire a tutor to study for the SAT, Kelly said.

Explore further: High school graduation requirements show promise for African American, Latino students

More information: www.nacacnet.org/research/rese… /DefiningPromise.pdf

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Standardized tests not always best indicator of success

Aug 24, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT have long been used in college admissions to sort through thousands of applications. Whether or not such tests accurately assess a student’s ability to succeed ...

School violence lowers test scores, not grades

Nov 06, 2013

It's hard to go a day without seeing news of violence in some form occurring in schools around the country, and Chicago is often cited as a city where crime rates in schools are particularly high. In a new study in the current ...

Recommended for you

Feeling bad at work can be a good thing

4 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Research by the University of Liverpool suggests that, contrary to popular opinion, it can be good to feel bad at work, whilst feeling good in the workplace can also lead to negative outcomes.

3Qs: Citizen journalism in Ferguson

5 hours ago

Tensions have escalated in Ferguson, Missouri, following the Aug. 9 shooting death of Michael Brown, an unarmed African-American teenager, by a white police officer. The incident has led to peaceful protests ...

Social inequality worsens in New Zealand

5 hours ago

Research by Dr Lisa Marriott, an associate professor in Victoria's School of Accounting and Commercial Law, and Dr Dalice Sim, Statistical Consultant in the School of Mathematics, Statistics and Operations Research, builds ...

User comments : 0