Closely-watched GM farm case begins in Australia

February 11, 2014 by Amy Coopes
An Australian farmer who lost his organic produce licence has taken his neighbour to court over contamination from his genetically modified canola crop in a closely-watched test case

An Australian farmer who lost his organic produce licence has taken his neighbour to court over contamination from his genetically modified canola crop in a closely-watched test case.

Steve Marsh's case against his neighbour Michael Baxter began in Western Australia's Supreme Court on Monday, seeking damages and a permanent injunction to protect his farm from future contamination.

Marsh lost organic certification on 70 percent of his land in 2010 after swathes and seed from Baxter's farm blew onto his property, resulting in "great financial hardship and an uncertain future".

His legal team said the case could set an important benchmark on farming.

"As far as we know, this is the first court case of its type anywhere in the world. It will test the legal rights of farmers to choose how and what they farm on their land," said lawyer Mark Walter.

"The case is about freedom of choice, for both farmers and for consumers. It is important that farmers retain their rights to farm GM-free food as this in turn will protect consumers' ability to purchase GM-free food."

'Unreasonable standards'

Baxter's defence team argues that Marsh's farm, where oats and other grains are grown and sheep graze, cannot be directly affected by the GM canola because he does not grow canola himself.

He takes issue with Australia's organic certifying body for what he claims are excessive and unreasonable standards that saw Marsh lose his licence.

The case is being watched closely by Australian legal experts who said there were a number of important issues at stake.

Agricultural lobbyists worry it could set a dangerous precedent about land use.

"This sort of liability claim has been long anticipated and expert authors have suggested that it is hard to make a liability claim when at the time a crop was planted the scientific weight of evidence suggests that there was not a reasonable anticipation of harm to others," said Paul Martin, from the Australian Centre for Agriculture and Law at the University of New England.

Martin said the fact that the Australian government's gene technology regulator had ruled that the risks were low fell heavily in Baxter's favour.

Bioethicist Rachel Ankeny, from the University of Adelaide, said both farmers had responsibilities not to harm their neighbours but the case was "far from clear-cut".

"Some might claim that the organic farmer is participating in a certification system primarily to receive a premium price but that system sets unrealistic limits regarding what counts as contamination," she said.

"Others might note that if the canola farmer has taken reasonable care to prevent drift, he may be argued to have fulfilled his ethical obligations."

Benefits of GM 'ignored'

La Trobe University plant scientist Jim Whelan said the legal battle reflected an ongoing public debate which demonised GM foods and ignored their benefits.

"GM has been shown to have positive effects on the environment, but sadly positive research about GM rarely makes it into the news," he said.

Environmental activists from Greenpeace have campaigned against genetically modified crops in Australia, breaking into government research farms and razing a wheat plantation with weed trimmers in 2011.

Greenpeace describes GM organisms as "genetic pollution" and warn that once released into the environment they cannot be recalled.

But Rick Roush from Melbourne University dismissed any broader significance of the case because it "has not and would not" occur in the United States or other countries, where "organic certifying agencies allow tolerances for GM presence".

"After more than a billion hectares of GM crops planted since their introduction, how is it that Steve Marsh suing his neighbour can be claimed as a landmark case?"

Explore further: What farmers think about GM crops

Related Stories

What farmers think about GM crops

February 24, 2008

Farmers are upbeat about genetically modified crops, according to new research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).

Critical consumers do often buy genetically modified food

October 15, 2013

Many people disapprove of genetically modified food. You would therefore expect them to avoid these products in supermarkets. Dutch researchers at TU Delft have revealed that by no means all European consumers put that theory ...

What you need to know about GMOS and GM crops

January 20, 2014

Genetically modified (GM) crops and foods and ingredients made available with the techniques of modern biotechnology have recently been dominating food and agriculture news coverage in the United States. Food Technology ...

Bangladesh releases first GM food

January 24, 2014

Authorities in Bangladesh have released the country's first ever genetically modified crop to farmers amid criticism from environmental groups, officials said Friday.

Recommended for you

New gene map reveals cancer's Achilles heel

November 25, 2015

Scientists have mapped out the genes that keep our cells alive, creating a long-awaited foothold for understanding how our genome works and which genes are crucial in disease like cancer.

Study suggests fish can experience 'emotional fever'

November 25, 2015

(—A small team of researchers from the U.K. and Spain has found via lab study that at least one type of fish is capable of experiencing 'emotional fever,' which suggests it may qualify as a sentient being. In their ...

How cells in the developing ear 'practice' hearing

November 25, 2015

Before the fluid of the middle ear drains and sound waves penetrate for the first time, the inner ear cells of newborn rodents practice for their big debut. Researchers at Johns Hopkins report they have figured out the molecular ...

How cells 'climb' to build fruit fly tracheas

November 25, 2015

Fruit fly windpipes are much more like human blood vessels than the entryway to human lungs. To create that intricate network, fly embryonic cells must sprout "fingers" and crawl into place. Now researchers at The Johns Hopkins ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.