Research shows more small business does not mean more entrepreneurs

January 21, 2014 by Marcia Malory report
Entrepreneurship rate: Number of billionaire entrepreneurs per million inhabitants, 1996–2010. Credit: PNAS, doi/10.1073/pnas.1307204111

( —Economists often measure rates of entrepreneurship by looking at the number of small businesses in an industry or a country. However, in a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Magnus Henrekson and Tino Sanandaji of the Research Institute of Industrial Economics in Sweden have found that small business ownership is a poor indicator of entrepreneurship. A better measure is the number of billionaires in the market, which correlates negatively with the number of small businesses and startups.

The researchers studied Schumpeterian entrepreneurs, defined as those who bring innovation to their industry and drive new growth. They noted that in the United States, most self-employed people are not entrepreneurs in this sense. Most of the self-employed run small businesses that do not grow. The majority do not have employees of their own. Previous research suggests that only between 10 and 20 percent of small businesses are innovative. The rest, such as landscaping companies, auto repair companies, restaurants, salons and child day care services, merely replicate businesses that already exist.

Henrekson and Sanandaji argued that the number of small businesses therefore does not provide an accurate measure of the number of entrepreneurs. To obtain a better measure, they looked at Forbes Magazine's annual lists of "The World's Billionaires" from 1996 through 2010. Of the 1,723 billionaires profiled, they identified 996 billionaires in 50 countries who had obtained their wealth by founding new companies. The researchers defined these as billionaire entrepreneurs.

There was a negative correlation between billionaire entrepreneurship and self-employment. Countries with the most billionaire entrepreneurs tended to have the lowest rates of self-employment. For example, Americans accounted for 40 percent of the billionaires, yet the United States has the second lowest self-employment rate of all developed countries. Within the U.S., this negative correlation occurred regionally and by industry. Boston and Silicon Valley, known for high levels of , had low levels of self-employment and small business ownership compared with the natural average. Industries with the most billionaire entrepreneurs had fewer businesses with less than 20 employees.

Henrekson and Sanandaji point out that by creating large companies, make it more harder for smaller businesses to thrive and grow. The emergence of corporations such as Walmart and Amazon has reduced the number of in their sectors. Large companies that do not directly compete with , such as Google and Microsoft, also decrease small business ownership by creating that attract people who might otherwise become self-employed.

Explore further: Study raises questions over entrepreneurship policies

More information: "Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship," by Magnus Henrekson and Tino Sanandaji. PNAS,

Related Stories

Entrepreneurial women needed to create growth and jobs

November 1, 2012

When it comes to adopting an entrepreneurial spirit, it's the men who have the edge. Despite European women accounting for over half of the population, they only make up a third of the EU's entrepreneurs, which is why the ...

Unlocking the entrepreneurial spirit

January 15, 2013

Being your own boss is an aspiration for many Europeans - almost 4 out of 10 people in fact. The prospect of a potentially better income, independence and the freedom to work wherever and whenever is a highly attractive prospect ...

Researchers analyze growth potential in African bank loans

December 2, 2013

In Africa, small women-owned business owners find it easier to obtain loans than their male counterparts. The reason for this distortion is that politicians and foreign aid organisations with their focus on bank loans for ...

Recommended for you

From a very old skeleton, new insights on ancient migrations

October 9, 2015

Three years ago, a group of researchers found a cave in Ethiopia with a secret: it held the 4,500-year-old remains of a man, with his head resting on a rock pillow, his hands folded under his face, and stone flake tools surrounding ...

Who you gonna trust? How power affects our faith in others

October 6, 2015

One of the ongoing themes of the current presidential campaign is that Americans are becoming increasingly distrustful of those who walk the corridors of power – Exhibit A being the Republican presidential primary, in which ...

Ancient genome from Africa sequenced for the first time

October 8, 2015

The first ancient human genome from Africa to be sequenced has revealed that a wave of migration back into Africa from Western Eurasia around 3,000 years ago was up to twice as significant as previously thought, and affected ...

Mexican site yields new details of sacrifice of Spaniards

October 9, 2015

It was one of the worst defeats in one of history's most dramatic conquests: Only a year after Hernan Cortes landed in Mexico, hundreds of people in a Spanish-led convey were captured, sacrificed and apparently eaten.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (1) Jan 21, 2014
make it more harder for smaller businesses to thrive and grow

"more harder"? Is that correct english?
5 / 5 (1) Jan 21, 2014
make it more harder for smaller businesses to thrive and grow

"more harder"? Is that correct english?

While not entirely incorrect, the word 'more' is undoubtedly redundant.
not rated yet Jan 21, 2014
What the article does point out is that over regulation and stifling fees hurt small business from propelling themselves into meaningful success. As developed as America is it thwarts entrepreneurship. Small business still accounts for more employment than larger corporations. Small businesses create opportunity. But, without proper regulation is stifles it. Liberal over regulation and bureaucracy is the problem not the free market.
not rated yet Jan 22, 2014
What the article does point out is that over regulation and stifling fees hurt small business from propelling themselves into meaningful success. . . .

No. The article does not mention regulation or fees. If (as it seems) you want to make the point, you need to provide support, because it's not in the article.
not rated yet Jan 22, 2014
That conclusion doesn't take a lot of thought. A country with a lot of billionaires implies more wildly successful companies hiring large numbers of people at good wages a large number of whom might otherwise have started their own little business. When the choice is a sure thing job with a successful company in an attractive industry or taking a chance by starting your own business most people will choose the sure thing. In countries without big successful businesses there really is not much choice.
not rated yet Jan 22, 2014
The author appears to be barely literate and apparently doesn't waste its money on copy editors.

Not only do we have "more harder" but also "Boston and Silicon Valley, known for high levels of entrepreneurship, had low levels of self-employment and small business ownership compared with the natural average."

I wonder what the natural average of self-employment and small business ownership is.

not rated yet Feb 01, 2014

I practice Business solutions.

You can find some useful products for entrepreneurs here - https://www.insta...ractice/]https://www.insta...ractice/[/url]




http://in.linkedi...hidharan (Rated 'Expert' for profile strength)
http://www.zintro...dharan-b ISSME Global SME Expert ( http://ezineartic...dharan_B
Practice Website: http://sashidhara...olutions
Products from practice: https://www.insta...ractice/]https://www.insta...ractice/[/url]

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.