Random Breath Test tactics fail to deter drunk drivers

January 7, 2014 by Kerry Faulkner
RBT tactics fail to deter drunk drivers
“While in WA the reduced volume of RBTs and the targeting of those RBTs done, may be resulting in the increasing number of alcohol related traffic crashes observed,” Mr Ferris says. Credit: Newtown grafitti

Western Australia's random breath testing strategy may be capturing more drink-drivers but not deterring drink-driving behaviour for the community.

That's the finding of research using random breath test (RBT) data from WA Police Services Traffic Policy Unit and Queensland Police Service's Traffic Analysis Unit to explore the relationship between breath testing and alcohol related traffic crashes (ARTC).

The two states deploy RBTs differently; Queensland uses a saturation approach where drivers are pulled over indiscriminately and the sites and times of the operations vary.

WA's is more targeted with specific times and locations for RBT actions like 'booze buses'.

The report says both saturation and target testing should deter people from drinking and driving but because drivers think there is less chance of them being caught in a targeted operation, it is not as effective a deterrent.

University of Queensland's Institute for Social Research senior research fellow Jason Ferris says the findings are significant.

"Starting in July 2004, the monthly number of alcohol related traffic crashes in WA was slightly higher than that of Queensland relative to the population of licenced drivers," he says.

"Over the following five years, Queensland's rate has remained stable whereas the rate in WA has been increasing significantly.

"While there may be other explanations – we believe that the stable rates in Queensland are a function of the high volume non-targeted RBTs.

"While in WA the reduced volume of RBTs and the targeting of those RBTs done, may be resulting in the increasing number of alcohol related traffic crashes observed."

The research further found that the number of alcohol related traffic crashes in WA would be cut by 15 per month if the number of random breath tests conducted by police was doubled.

This would mean an additional 50,000 RBTs per month.

The findings, titled "Random breath testing in Queensland and Western Australia: Examination of how the random breath testing rate influences alcohol related traffic crash rates" have been reported in Elsevier and researchers say they provide valuable evidence on the effectiveness of RBT in deterring drink drivers.

Mr Ferris says future research will include determining the optimum level of RBT enforcement and if a national RBT policy is needed.

"A national RBT policy is something that we believe in – and are currently extending our research to examine other states and jurisdiction data looking at the association between RBTs and alcohol-related ," Mr Ferris says.

Explore further: RBT study shows a little respect goes a long way

More information: "Random breath testing in Queensland and Western Australia: examination of how the random breath testing rate influences alcohol related traffic crash rates." Ferris J, Mazerolle L, King M, Bates L, Bennett S, Devaney M. Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:181-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

Related Stories

RBT study shows a little respect goes a long way

December 19, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- In a world-first trial, criminology researchers at The University of Queensland have tested the theory of procedural justice in policing and found that respectful dialogue with citizens during routine encounters ...

Recommended for you

Just how good (or bad) is the fossil record of dinosaurs?

August 28, 2015

Everyone is excited by discoveries of new dinosaurs – or indeed any new fossil species. But a key question for palaeontologists is 'just how good is the fossil record?' Do we know fifty per cent of the species of dinosaurs ...

Fractals patterns in a drummer's music

August 28, 2015

Fractal patterns are profoundly human – at least in music. This is one of the findings of a team headed by researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization in Göttingen and Harvard University ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Returners
1 / 5 (1) Jan 07, 2014
People who are going to break laws, or do other risky behavior do not generally curb behavior due to "deterrent" policies; not education, not the threat of punishment or accidental death.

Examples:
"No diving. Risk of death on rocks." - They dive anyway.
threat of detention, corporal punishment, suspension, etc at school - They fight, bully, do drugs on campus anyway.

Don't drink and drive. - "Hey, it won't happen to me, that's somebody else, etc," and drives anyway.

Surgeon General's Warning: "Nah, I'll smoke a pack or two per day anyway."

"Bath Salts" is killing people: "Hey, let's go try it! I never did that drug before. I wonder how it feels?"

As soon as you point out something is negative, risky, or even just plain evil, people with the "I'll try anything once," attitude are apt to go try it just to find out for themselves, first hand, what's wrong with it. Then they get addicted to it if it's a drug or alcohol, compounding their idiocy even further.
Zephir_fan
Jan 07, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.