Impact of climate change on tea quality

Jan 20, 2014 by Alexander Reid

Climate change is reportedly affecting the cultivation of tea in China, with changes in temperatures and rainfall altering not only the taste, aroma, and potential health benefits of the popular beverage but also the lives of farmers who grow tea for a living.

A research team headed by Tufts University biologist Colin Orians will study this development in a four-year project funded by a $931,000 grant from the National Science Foundation.

The study will first examine how climate change affects the concentration of chemical compounds that are responsible for tea's stimulant, sensory and healthful properties. Their work will build on preliminary research conducted in southwestern China's Yunnan Province by co-principal investigator and tea expert Selena Ahmed while she was a graduate student and later Training in Education and Critical Research Skills Program (TEACRS) postdoctoral fellow at Tufts.

Green tea, Orians notes, is widely known to contain high concentrations of antioxidants that are believed to help prevent or moderate a range of health problems associated with the heart, blood sugar and digestion.

"Since the quality of tea is determined by a range of secondary chemicals that depend on climatic conditions, climate change can have significant consequences for tea markets," says Orians, a professor in the Department of Biology in the School of Arts and Sciences at Tufts. "People buy and drink tea for certain qualities. If those qualities are not there, then they may not buy the tea."

The study findings may also help scientists and growers better understand climate change's effects on other agricultural products such as grapes and cherries. "What we see happening to tea could be a harbinger of what could happen to agriculture in general," Orians says.

Tea is among the world's most widely consumed beverages. One of the biggest markets for tea is the United States where Americans drink 3.6 billion gallons annually and supermarket sales top $2 billion, according to the Tea Association of the USA. Leading tea-producing countries are Argentina, China, India and Indonesia.

The Tufts-led researchers will focus on three major tea-producing provinces in China: Yunnan, Zhejiang and Fujian. Ahmed has written a doctoral dissertation and scientific articles on the subject and, based on her research, co-authored "Tea Horse Road: China's Ancient Trade Road to Tibet" (River Books Press, 2011) about tea production and trade in southwestern China.

Now an assistant professor in sustainable food systems at Montana State University, Ahmed surveyed Yunnan tea growers who described warmer temperatures in the winter and longer, more intense rainy seasons than in the past. Her co-principal investigator for that work was Rick Stepp, associate professor of anthropology at the University of Florida and a member of the NSF grant team.

"Farmers value both the bitter sweetness and a lingering sweet aftertaste of tea," says Ahmed. "In our research, we learned that farmers perceived diminished quality in tea which they associated with the onset of monsoons. We have seen a seen a decrease in some key chemical compounds that are responsible for producing this flavor. These are also responsible for tea's health properties."

In addition to studying the concentrations of tea's key chemicals, the researchers will survey consumers to determine how respond to teas of diminished quality. "Diminished quality could hamper demand for tea, which is critical to farmers whose livelihoods depend on the market," says Ahmed. The researchers will also look at ways in which tea growers can adjust farming methods to mitigate the effects of weather changes.

"After gaining a picture of how is adversely affecting tea production and gauging consumer response, we hope to be able to develop new possibilities for adapting production to a changing climate," says Orians.

Explore further: Green tea may interfere with a blood pressure medicine

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Analyzing green tea leaves and supplements

May 01, 2012

Quality control is a key factor in making sure green tea dietary supplement products pack the same antioxidant punch as green tea leaves used for brewing beverages, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) scientists.

Green tea reduces cholesterol risk

Jul 08, 2011

(Medical Xpress) -- In a recent study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Xin-Xin Zheng reports that green tea reduces LDL and total cholesterol. This could explain the reasoning behind ...

Recommended for you

Extinctions during human era worse than thought

1 hour ago

It's hard to comprehend how bad the current rate of species extinction around the world has become without knowing what it was before people came along. The newest estimate is that the pre-human rate was ...

Robotics to combat slimy pest

4 hours ago

One hundred years after they arrived in a sack of grain, white Italian snails are the target of beleaguered South Australian farmers who have joined forces with University of Sydney robotics experts to eradicate ...

Migratory fish scale to new heights

5 hours ago

WA scientists are the first to observe and document juvenile trout minnow (Galaxias truttaceus Valenciennes 1846) successfully negotiating a vertical weir wall by modifying their swimming technique to 'climb' ...

Frequent fire and drying climate threaten WA plants

5 hours ago

Murdoch University fire ecology experts have warned that in Western Australia's drying climate, many of the plant species which contribute to the stunning wildflower displays north of Perth may need 50 per ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mememine69
1 / 5 (3) Jan 20, 2014
Do you remaining believers choose to ignore the fact that science agreed on nothing beyond just; "could be" or did you really not know what it was you were agreeing on in the first place? How hard was it to look beyond the headline of "consensus"? Yes you told your own kids to "believe" in a 31 year old "maybe" crisis that you thought was a sacred scientific "belief" in a coming CO2 climate catastrophe. Now who's the neocon?
*Prove me wrong. Not one IPCC warning agrees beyond "could be" or says "will be a crisis" or is "inevitable" or "eventual" like they love to say comet hits are. YOU cannot decide scientific certainty.
Believe all you want but don't tell kids that science "believes" as much as you do.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (4) Jan 20, 2014
Do you remaining believers choose to ignore the fact that science agreed on nothing beyond just; "could be"

You do realize that when a scientist says "could be" we're in the probability ranges you'd be comfortable to wager your life on in real life?
At 99% plus scientists still talk about 'could be', because there is still a margin of error. At those kinds of probabilities you'd comfortably put all your chips on 'red'.

So why all of a sudden not in the matter of climate change? Too complicated for your brain?