Rise of the Google machines: The robotics companies involved

Jan 08, 2014 by Chris Chesher, The Conversation
Google’s turned attention to robotics by buying up companies … but what do those firms do? Credit: Dita Actor

Google recently acquired eight high profile start-up robotics companies, providing strong evidence of a strategy to create breakthrough applications for robotics over the next decade. This strategy is most likely to concentrate on manufacturing and logistics.

Bringing these companies together, Google will need to find synergies between diverse organisations and personalities. This mission will be headed by Andy Rubin, who previously managed the successful Android operating system for mobile devices.

Rubin describes Google's highly ambitious goal of finding technically and economically viable applications for robotics as a "moon shot": a highly concentrated effort of an integrated team to create landmark achievements in a field. The mission to put a man on the moon is one clear precedent.

There are many other possible analogies for Google's robot "moon shot". Journalist Tom Green, writing in Robotics Business Review, compares Google's contribution to the robotics industry to the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's (DARPA) pivotal role in establishing the founding technologies of the internet.

Google's project might also be compared with Atari research lab, formed in the 1970s to generate innovations in computer game and entertainment technologies. (Unfortunately this did not prevent the massive failure of the company in the mid-1980s.)

An even less appealing analogy is the Manhattan Project that created the atomic bomb in the 1940s. Considering the role of the US military in funding and fostering robotics research, the parallel is not so far off.

Xerox PARC is another corporate that has been highly successful in innovating in the domain of office technologies, but is known most for its failure to transfer research prototypes to viable products.

The original moon shot. Credit: NASA

In expanding Google's investments in robotics, Rubin will face the challenge of integrating the companies that form Google's moon shot at Palo Alto, California. What is notable about many of these companies is they are either interdisciplinary in orientation, or highly specialised.

Many of the companies began as spin-offs from university robotics research. The companies that had a spin-off culture will need to transition into being part of a large organisation, with the politics that this entails.

So who has Google bought and what do they do?

Bot & Dolly

Bot & Dolly is largely a product of the film industry, creating robotic systems to control cameras in movies such as Gravity.

This film included sequences that began as computer-generated imagery, which was matched with live action sequences using robotic cameras. In the clip below, robot cameras captured the astronaut's faces as they spun around in zero gravity.

These images were mapped into the computer-generated sequence. Experimenting at the intersections of cinema, robotics and stage magic, Bot & Dolly produced a stunning performance piece called Box.

Box uses two robots to manipulate screens onto which high definition projectors present geometrical and op-art inspired patterns. A human performer interacts with the screen images, creating a seamless hybrid of multiple disciplines.

Autofuss

Bot & Dolly's design studio arm Autofuss emphasises its collaborative approach "colliding visual artists with programmers, engineers with designers, storytellers with illustrators, architects with machinists".

It has produced promotional videos for Google, Microsoft and Adobe. These promotions make heavy use of robotic cameras, motion design, animation and live action production.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

Meka Robotics

Meka is another university spin-off company, coming out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in 2006. One of their aims is to create highly agile robots that can run quickly over uneven ground.

Holomni

Holomni is a design firm that specialises in highly controllable caster wheels that can position robots with 360 degree precision. Such a specialised company is likely to produce devices that slot well into any robot that needs precise mobility.

Redwood Robotics

Redwood Robotics is a Silicon Valley company specialising in robotics arms. It is a 2012 spin-off from Meka Robotics, Willow Garage and SRI International, and aims to create a:

"new generation arm" for robots […] that does for robotics what the Apple II did for computers: get the hardware out of factories and into homes.

Like Holomni, the strategy is the concentrate on one particular component that can be used in a variety of robot applications. Whether Google will pursue this goal of providing wheels and arms to the wider industry, or not, it not yet clear.

Industrial Perception

A spin-off from high profile robotics company Willow Garage, Industrial Perception Inc produces 3D visual perception systems for applications such as unloading trucks and feeding parts.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

They aimed to produce product-level robots that could work at a level and speed comparable to humans unloading trucks (see Casey Nobile's article in Robotics Business Review). Industrial Perception's goals seem in line with Google's goals with their move into robotics.

Boston Dynamics

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

Boston Dynamics has achieved a high profile for its robotics projects by posting popular videos of its intimidating robots Big Dog, Cheetah and PETMan.

Their projects have been funded by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

Boston Dynamics was founded in 1992 by Marc Raibert, a former professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It was the eighth and last of the companies to join Google so far.

Schaft

Schaft is a Japanese engineering company that spun off from the University of Tokyo. It recently won the DARPA Robotics Challenge, a competition for robotic performance funded and supported by DARPA.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

The goal of the competition was to complete tasks to a rescue robot that could drive a vehicle, walk on uneven ground, walk up an industrial ladder, clear debris, open a door, cut through a wall, open a valve and use a hose. The only non-US competitor, Schaft's scored 27 out of 32 points and beat the Boston Dynamics team by some margin.

Robot cultures

The Googlefication of robotics research is likely to represent something of a cultural shift for the organisations and employees involved. However, there are common stories for many of the companies. The grounding of much of the research in universities is one clear shared experience.

Each of the companies above has highly specialised applications and well-formed visions. Google wisely selected companies on the basis of some firm instrumental orientation and corporate vision.

In spite of the growing investments in robotics, longer term questions about the future models for robotics in everyday life remain open. How key components—from machine vision to directional wheels, from automated cameras to humanoid rescue robots—might combine into transformative applications is yet to be seen.

Also yet to be known is the impact of Google's taking cream from the top of a still-young robotics industry.

Explore further: SCHAFT team tops scores at DARPA Robotics Challenge

Related Stories

SCHAFT team tops scores at DARPA Robotics Challenge

Dec 23, 2013

(Phys.org) —For those wondering who of 16 competing teams would walk away as top performers in the two-day DARPA Robotics Challenge in Florida over the weekend, the suspense is over. SCHAFT, a Japanese ...

Atlas teams head for DARPA Robotics Challenge

Nov 26, 2013

(Phys.org) —December 20 is a big day for teams competing in the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Robotics Challenge. The idea is to promote critical improvements in what robots can do to ...

Junior Robotics online exhibit showcases kids' robots

Mar 12, 2013

(Phys.org) —As robotics has become an increasingly popular way to get kids and teens involved in the field of engineering, the robotics projects that the kids are doing have become more creative and sophisticated. ...

Recommended for you

Q&A: Drones might help explain how tornadoes form

Dec 18, 2014

Researchers say they have collected promising weather data by flying instrument-laden drones into big Western and Midwestern storms. Now, they want to expand the project in hopes of learning more about how ...

First steps for Hector the robot stick insect

Dec 16, 2014

A research team at Bielefeld University has succeeded in teaching the only robot of its kind in the world how to walk. Its first steps have been recorded in a video. The robot is called Hector, and its construction ...

Getting bot responders into shape

Dec 16, 2014

Sandia National Laboratories is tackling one of the biggest barriers to the use of robots in emergency response: energy efficiency.

Robot 'shadow hand'

Dec 12, 2014

Picking up an apple is one of those jobs requiring the delicate touch of the human hand – or its robotic counterpart.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

krundoloss
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 08, 2014
If we can get a decent power source for these robots, then they will be viable. Until then, they are just fancy appliances. Maybe some wireless power source could be used, allowing the robots to function within a given area, untethered. It would also be much safer since the robots cannot "go wild", outside of a given area, at least.
Whydening Gyre
not rated yet Jan 08, 2014
They have plenty of power. what's needed is more efficient storage and USE of the available power...
krundoloss
not rated yet Jan 10, 2014
Dude you know what I meant. A robot with a wire is not as useful as one with internal power.
Whydening Gyre
not rated yet Jan 10, 2014
Dude you know what I meant. A robot with a wire is not as useful as one with internal power.
Sorry - was thinking batteries...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.