Good vision for a good appetite

Jan 13, 2014
Good vision for a good appetite
Checking a salmon smolt for cataracts, a condition that is preventable through feed additives. Credit: Sofie Charlotte Remø

The incidence of cataracts in farmed salmon is on the rise due to vegetable-based feeds, a strong focus on fish growth and warm waters. "This is a condition we can do something about," asserts Sofie Charlotte Remø.

Ms Remø, a researcher at Norway's National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), is studying this eye disease for her doctorate.

In , the gradual clouding of the eye lens caused by cataracts makes it difficult for fish to find their feed. The condition results from insufficient amounts of the amino acid histidine, replacing fish oils with vegetable oils in feed, rapid growth and warm ocean temperatures.

"To prevent the development of cataracts after the salmon have been put to sea, they need more histidine than is needed for growth alone," explains Ms Remø.

"Up to now, histidine levels have been based on their growth requirements. Cataracts as a fish welfare problem in aquaculture can be prevented by putting more histidine in the feed."

Vegetable oils may affect genes

Farmed salmon need extra histidine to build up the level of N-acetyl-histidine (NAH) in the lens of the eye. NAH inhibits cataracts through its antioxidant properties and osmolytic effect (regulating the balance of fluids in the lens). Ms Remø has also been studying whether increased use of vegetable oils in salmon feed and warmer seawater temperatures raise the risk of developing cataracts.

"The salmon eye lens is only slightly affected when the feed contains fatty acids from vegetable rather than marine sources," continues Ms Remø. "But the do affect lens genes that control the defence against cataracts."

Feeds with more vegetable-based ingredients may make salmon more susceptible to developing cataracts in conjunction with certain external factors, such as warmer ocean temperatures. More research is needed to determine how great a risk is involved.

Higher incidence with global warming

Since fish are cold-blooded, their metabolism and growth are affected by marine temperatures. In recent years, seawater temperatures have exceeded 18°C in several areas along Norway's western and southern coasts. During these warm spells the fish use more of their feed for maintenance of bodily functions rather than growing.

"Their histidine requirement is higher in seawater than in fresh water," says Ms Remø, "and sufficient histidine is especially important in higher temperatures."

Her trials show that smolts develop cataracts very quickly when there is too little histidine added to their feed. In the course of one month in seawater, her 70-gram smolt subjects developed that were so serious they would lead to difficulty in finding feed and growing to slaughter size.

Compared to salmon, rainbow trout are able to produce more NAH and are thus less susceptible to the disease in higher seawater temperatures.

Explore further: Salmon fry have less sensitive intestines than smolt

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Salmon fry have less sensitive intestines than smolt

Dec 02, 2013

A PhD research project at the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science has provided essential knowledge about the mechanisms leading to feed-induced enteritis in salmon and also insight into the salmon's intestinal ...

Spicing up your fish fillets with science

Aug 14, 2013

The health benefits of consuming omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids such as EPA and DHA are well established. The primary sources of these fatty acids in the human diet are through fish and seafood. Researchers ...

Recommended for you

Sharks contain more pollutants than polar bears

23 hours ago

The polar bear is known for having alarmingly high concentrations of PCB and other pollutants. But researchers have discovered that Greenland sharks store even more of these contaminants in their bodies.

Moth study suggests hidden climate change impacts

Apr 15, 2014

A 32-year study of subarctic forest moths in Finnish Lapland suggests that scientists may be underestimating the impacts of climate change on animals and plants because much of the harm is hidden from view.

User comments : 0

More news stories

ESO image: A study in scarlet

This new image from ESO's La Silla Observatory in Chile reveals a cloud of hydrogen called Gum 41. In the middle of this little-known nebula, brilliant hot young stars are giving off energetic radiation that ...

First direct observations of excitons in motion achieved

A quasiparticle called an exciton—responsible for the transfer of energy within devices such as solar cells, LEDs, and semiconductor circuits—has been understood theoretically for decades. But exciton movement within ...

Warm US West, cold East: A 4,000-year pattern

Last winter's curvy jet stream pattern brought mild temperatures to western North America and harsh cold to the East. A University of Utah-led study shows that pattern became more pronounced 4,000 years ago, ...

Patent talk: Google sharpens contact lens vision

(Phys.org) —A report from Patent Bolt brings us one step closer to what Google may have in mind in developing smart contact lenses. According to the discussion Google is interested in the concept of contact ...