Europe squabbling over greenhouse gas targets

Jan 10, 2014
The sun is seen through dark clouds in Klanxbuell, northern Germany, on December 7, 2013

European nations stand sharply divided over setting new 2030 targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming, EU sources said Friday.

European Commission head Jose Manuel Barroso called in commissioners to try to agree figures ahead of talks on January 22 but there was no progress, one source said.

Parliament's environmental and energy committees on Thursday called for a 2030 reduction target of 40 percent for , based on 1990 levels.

In addition, they want renewable sources to account for 30 percent of the energy mix while efficiency should be improved 40 percent.

"The 40 percent CO2 reduction is not agreed yet," the source said.

"Barroso and (EU Climate Change Commissioner) Connie Hedegaad are fighting against (Energy Commissioner) Guenther Oettinger who wants to fix it at 35 percent," said the source, who asked not to be named.

Germany's Oettinger has the support of Business Europe which groups all the EU's industrial associations.

Business Europe head Emma Marcegaglia said in a letter to Barroso that the new climate and energy package must be carefully considered, with a "realistic target."

Cooling towers at the Neurath coal-fired power station at Grevenbroich near Aachen, southern Germany on September 11, 2012

It should also be "compatible with the imperative need of strengthening our industries and restoring Europe as a place for industrial investment," Marcegaglia said.

Crucially, the "EU should move away from the three overlapping targets... which cause inefficiencies, lead to additional regulatory burdens and increase energy prices," she said.

Instead, there should be just one target, for CO2 emissions reduction, Marcegaglia said in the letter posted on the group's website.

In 2008, the EU agreed a 20-20-20 programme with a deadline of 2020 and it is this scheme which is being updated to fix new 2030 targets.

Many of the EU's 28 member states have reservations about various parts of the proposals.

Britain, France and Spain for example oppose increasing the target for renewable energy use because this could reduce the amount of nuclear power in their programmes, the source said.

In contrast, Germany, which is closing down its nuclear power industry in light of the 2011 Fukushima, backs the 30 percent renewables target.

Many MEPs and environmental groups have attacked the Commission, the EU's executive arm, for being too timid when it should be taking a firmer line ahead of the UN's climate conference in September.

Explore further: US to propose stricter smog standard

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

EU on track for climate targets

Oct 09, 2013

The European Union is on track to meet its 2020 targets for reducing carbon emissions and switching to cleaner energy sources, its environmental watchdog said on Wednesday.

EU signals end to high subsidies for renewable energy

Nov 05, 2013

The European Commission issued new guidelines Tuesday which could end costly and controversial subsidies for renewable energy, opening the way for state-aid backing of gas or coal-fired electricity generation ...

EU says emissions down, but pollution scheme falters

May 16, 2013

EU greenhouse gas emissions, blamed for global warming, dropped slightly last year but the much-vaunted system for cutting such pollution ran into even more trouble, the European Commission said on Thursday.

New EU climate policy unlikely before 2015: Poland

May 23, 2013

The European Union is unlikely to hammer out its new policy on global warming ahead of a global climate deal that could be clinched in 2015, Poland's environment minister said Wednesday.

Recommended for you

Tool kit for ocean health

35 minutes ago

The ocean is undergoing global changes at a remarkable pace and we must change with it to attain our best possible future ocean, warns the head of The University of Western Australia's Oceans Institute.

Researcher studies interactions between land and water

55 minutes ago

Early one morning last January, MIT undergraduate Theresa Oehmke was eating breakfast at the Kilauea Military Camp on Hawaii's Big Island when a colleague burst into the room, yelling, "Oh my god, the plume, ...

Geoengineering our climate is not a 'quick fix'

2 hours ago

The deliberate, large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system is not a "quick fix" for global warming, according to the findings of the UK's first publicly funded studies on geoengineering.

US to propose stricter smog standard

4 hours ago

Coming full circle on a campaign promise, the Obama administration will propose Wednesday to reduce the amount of smog-forming pollution allowed in the air, which has been linked to asthma, lung damage and ...

Sao Paulo drought issue for global concern

4 hours ago

He cast his rod happily here for 30 years—but where a river once teemed with fish, Brazilian fisherman Ernane da Silva these days stares out over a valley of weeds and bone dry, sun-parched land.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

deatopmg
2.9 / 5 (7) Jan 10, 2014
They are squabbling because some believe the observables and others in fantasy theories.
Returners
3 / 5 (7) Jan 10, 2014
Britain, France and Spain for example oppose increasing the target for renewable energy use because this could reduce the amount of nuclear power in their programmes, the source said.


It makes no sense to deactivate nuke facilities, since they don't contribute as much to climate change over the long term. In fact, they ought to be viewed as a big part of any pollution reduction scheme.

Nuclear waste is not the crap we see in movies or cartoons. Properly stored it doesn't jump up and run away or become a TNMT mutagenic ooze. Additionally, unlike sequestered gaseous wastes, it also doesn't create ground pressure to force itself back out of a storage facility.

The proposal seems quite unreasonable to me if they are going to be forced to deactivate nuke power plants.
Zephir_fan
Jan 10, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
vlaaing peerd
5 / 5 (1) Jan 15, 2014
boy.... the never ending EU consensus. I do applaud the fact that we are able to set guidelines for 28 countries with very different cultures and politics, but maaaaaann.... this decision making always takes ages!

I think we'll be able to reach an agreement at around 2028.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.