Environment affects an organism's complexity

January 2, 2014

Scientists have demonstrated that organisms with greater complexity are more likely to evolve in complex environments, according to research published this week in PLOS Computational Biology. The researchers, based at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and University of Vermont, created a programme that simulated the evolution of virtual creatures in a variety of landscapes.

Each virtual organism was made using a particular form of genetic encoding to create three-dimensional models and then simulated in a physically-realistic virtual world. Creatures that evolved in flat landscapes had a simple shape, but could not adequately navigate more complex environments. Later environments were designed with elevated "ice blocks". These obstacles were constructed so that each organism had to reach inside the gaps between the blocks to move forwards.

Overall, the researchers found that the investigated environments actively induced selection on the body plans and nervous systems of the simulated creatures. More complex landscapes led to more than simpler environments due to the cost inherent in morphological complexity: evolution only produces complex body shapes in environments that demand them.

Study author Joshua Auerbach comments:

"Our work supports the idea that the morphological complexity of organisms is influenced by the complexity of the environments in which they evolve. While our work does not prove anything about , it does provide a new methodology for investigating questions about the evolution of complexity in silico."

Explore further: Complexity not so costly after all, analysis shows

More information: PLoS Comput Biol 10(1): e1003399. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003399

Related Stories

Complexity not so costly after all, analysis shows

September 27, 2010

The more complex a plant or animal, the more difficulty it should have adapting to changes in the environment. That's been a maxim of evolutionary theory since biologist Ronald Fisher put forth the idea in 1930.

Environmental complexity promotes biodiversity

September 17, 2013

A new study published in the journal American Naturalist helps explain how spatial variation in natural environments helps spur evolution and give rise to biodiversity.

Recommended for you

A novel toxin for M. tuberculosis

August 4, 2015

Despite 132 years of study, no toxin had ever been found for the deadly pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which infects 9 million people a year and kills more than 1 million.

New biosensors for managing microbial 'workers'

August 4, 2015

Super productive factories of the future could employ fleets of genetically engineered bacterial cells, such as common E. coli, to produce valuable chemical commodities in an environmentally friendly way. By leveraging their ...

Fish that have their own fish finders

August 4, 2015

The more than 200 species in the family Mormyridae communicate with one another in a way completely alien to our species: by means of electric discharges generated by an organ in their tails.

Volcanic bacteria take minimalist approach to survival

August 4, 2015

New research by scientists at the University of Otago and GNS Science is helping to solve the puzzle of how bacteria are able to live in nutrient-starved environments. It is well-established that the majority of bacteria ...

Sundew discovery on Facebook makes plant science news

August 3, 2015

A new species of sundew has been discovered on Facebook. The find is a carnivorous sundew, Drosera magnifica. The new discovery comes from a single mountaintop in southeastern Brazil—the largest New World sundew.

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Returners
1 / 5 (3) Jan 02, 2014
Scientists have demonstrated that organisms with greater complexity are more likely to evolve in complex environments, according to research published this week in PLOS Computational Biology.


You can easily say the same thing for anything that has been designed. If you have a simple task, you make a simple tool. If you have a complex task, you make a complex tool, or set of tools.

Since I highly doubt we have computer programs which can accurately model DNA and cell growth enough to predict the morphology of an organism, it seems obvious to me that the computer program is over-simplified compared to real life anyway.

I have seen, for example, on some Science television programs, simulated environments for various creatures, but the truth is the scientists "seeded" the environment with the types of creatures they thought ought to be there (though alien and exotic compared to Earth standards).

Can't reach between blocks where food might be? Obviously dies. No big deal really.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (2) Jan 02, 2014
Creationist trolling, always amusing.

Never mind that we have known for over 150 years that evolution applies in biology, and hence ideas of magic were utterly erroneous. Nature is atheist, some people isn't. Their loss.
Zephir_fan
Jan 02, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
VENDItardE
3 / 5 (2) Jan 02, 2014
ie the more liberal the environment the simpler the organism,,,,i totally agree
Captain Stumpy
4 / 5 (1) Jan 03, 2014
You can easily say the same thing for anything that has been designed. If you have a simple task, you make a simple tool. If you have a complex task, you make a complex tool, or set of tools.


@Returners
serious question: what about using a simple tool for complex tasks?

a knife is a simple tool, but can be used for complex tasks, not just for cutting.

IMHO- you dont always need a complex tool for a complex task.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.