To curb China's haze and air pollution, use water

Jan 06, 2014
To curb China's haze and air pollution, use water

A new idea to cut back on air pollution: spray water into the atmosphere from sprinklers atop tall buildings and towers, similar to watering a garden. This suggestion comes from Shaocai Yu of Zhejiang University in China, and North Carolina State University in the US. In an article published in Springer's journal Environmental Chemistry Letters, Yu suggests this course of action as a novel approach to help curb the severe air pollution and heavy haze that is experienced in many Chinese cities, as well as others around the world.

Over the past 30 years the megacities of China have suffered from air pollution because of the nation's decades-long burst of economic and industrial growth. Moreover, air pollution of this nature is not easy to manage, because the pollution typically comes from a variety of sources such as coal-based energy, traffic and heating in the megacities themselves.

But in a new article, Yu proposes spraying into the to simulate natural types of precipitation that are able to most effectively scavenge or collect and remove aerosol and gaseous pollutants. And while chemical agents can be added to the water sprayed for other purposes, Yu recommends forgoing the addition of these chemicals to keep the process as natural as possible to avoid side effects that might cause harm to the environment. Finally, because water that is used for these purposes could be collected and reused, adopting this kind of plan would not exacerbate existing water shortages.

Yu predicts that this geoengineering scheme could help to reduce the fine particle load in the atmosphere efficiently to a safer level of 35 micrograms per cubic meter. And it could be done in a short time, depending how the water is sprayed. This geoengineering technique needs to be implemented daily to avoid the accumulation of in the atmosphere and the occurrence of haze. According to Yu, this option is very natural, technologically feasible, efficient and low cost. All the necessary technologies and materials required to make it work are already available, from high buildings, towers and aircraft, to weather modification technology and automatic sprinkler heads.

"With careful and considered evaluation beforehand for each area in the cities, this geoengineering approach can be environmentally safe without significant side effects. It can also be deployed easily within communities and on a massive scale at low cost," Yu writes. "If you can spend half an hour watering your garden, you can also spend 30 minutes watering your ambient atmosphere to keep the air clean with this technique."

Explore further: Rising anger as Nicaragua canal to break ground

More information: Yu, S. (2013). Water spray geoengineering to clean air pollution for mitigating haze in China's cities, Environmental Chemistry Letters. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-013-0444-0

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Silent killer strikes at peak hour

Nov 18, 2013

It's official - air pollution causes cancer and a QUT researcher is calling on Australian policymakers to do more to save lives.

Recommended for you

Rising anger as Nicaragua canal to break ground

Dec 21, 2014

As a conscripted soldier during the Contra War of the 1980s, Esteban Ruiz used to flee from battles because he didn't want to have to kill anyone. But now, as the 47-year-old farmer prepares to fight for ...

Hopes, fears, doubts surround Cuba's oil future

Dec 20, 2014

One of the most prolific oil and gas basins on the planet sits just off Cuba's northwest coast, and the thaw in relations with the United States is giving rise to hopes that Cuba can now get in on the action.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Returners
1 / 5 (1) Jan 06, 2014
Seems feasible in theory, but that is a lot of sprinkler systems to clean the atmosphere of an entire city.

I think it'd be useful on perhaps the worst days, but I'm thinking a typical day might not gain much benefit. You may end up cleaning the air only to have the clean air blown out into the country side, where it would have been filtered eventually anyway.

I think with a little consideration the savings to the people in medical costs would potentially pay for the system over a period of decades, maybe less I guess. Preventing just one case of lung cancer could potentially pay for the systems on several buildings in medical cost savings and savings that would have been lost wages and productivity. More importantly preventing human suffering, that is if the system works.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.