To curb China's haze and air pollution, use water

Jan 06, 2014
To curb China's haze and air pollution, use water

A new idea to cut back on air pollution: spray water into the atmosphere from sprinklers atop tall buildings and towers, similar to watering a garden. This suggestion comes from Shaocai Yu of Zhejiang University in China, and North Carolina State University in the US. In an article published in Springer's journal Environmental Chemistry Letters, Yu suggests this course of action as a novel approach to help curb the severe air pollution and heavy haze that is experienced in many Chinese cities, as well as others around the world.

Over the past 30 years the megacities of China have suffered from air pollution because of the nation's decades-long burst of economic and industrial growth. Moreover, air pollution of this nature is not easy to manage, because the pollution typically comes from a variety of sources such as coal-based energy, traffic and heating in the megacities themselves.

But in a new article, Yu proposes spraying into the to simulate natural types of precipitation that are able to most effectively scavenge or collect and remove aerosol and gaseous pollutants. And while chemical agents can be added to the water sprayed for other purposes, Yu recommends forgoing the addition of these chemicals to keep the process as natural as possible to avoid side effects that might cause harm to the environment. Finally, because water that is used for these purposes could be collected and reused, adopting this kind of plan would not exacerbate existing water shortages.

Yu predicts that this geoengineering scheme could help to reduce the fine particle load in the atmosphere efficiently to a safer level of 35 micrograms per cubic meter. And it could be done in a short time, depending how the water is sprayed. This geoengineering technique needs to be implemented daily to avoid the accumulation of in the atmosphere and the occurrence of haze. According to Yu, this option is very natural, technologically feasible, efficient and low cost. All the necessary technologies and materials required to make it work are already available, from high buildings, towers and aircraft, to weather modification technology and automatic sprinkler heads.

"With careful and considered evaluation beforehand for each area in the cities, this geoengineering approach can be environmentally safe without significant side effects. It can also be deployed easily within communities and on a massive scale at low cost," Yu writes. "If you can spend half an hour watering your garden, you can also spend 30 minutes watering your ambient atmosphere to keep the air clean with this technique."

Explore further: Heavy air pollution hits Shanghai, delaying flights

More information: Yu, S. (2013). Water spray geoengineering to clean air pollution for mitigating haze in China's cities, Environmental Chemistry Letters. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-013-0444-0

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Silent killer strikes at peak hour

Nov 18, 2013

It's official - air pollution causes cancer and a QUT researcher is calling on Australian policymakers to do more to save lives.

Recommended for you

Heavy metals and hydroelectricity

16 minutes ago

Hydraulic engineering is increasingly relied on for hydroelectricity generation. However, redirecting stream flow can yield unintended consequences. In the August 2014 issue of GSA Today, Donald Rodbell of ...

What's wiping out the Caribbean corals?

1 hour ago

Here's what we know about white-band disease: It has already killed up to 95 percent of the Caribbean's reef-building elkhorn and staghorn corals, and it's caused by an infectious bacteria that seems to be ...

Selective logging takes its toll on mammals, amphibians

19 hours ago

The selective logging of trees in otherwise intact tropical forests can take a serious toll on the number of animal species living there. Mammals and amphibians are particularly sensitive to the effects of ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Returners
1 / 5 (1) Jan 06, 2014
Seems feasible in theory, but that is a lot of sprinkler systems to clean the atmosphere of an entire city.

I think it'd be useful on perhaps the worst days, but I'm thinking a typical day might not gain much benefit. You may end up cleaning the air only to have the clean air blown out into the country side, where it would have been filtered eventually anyway.

I think with a little consideration the savings to the people in medical costs would potentially pay for the system over a period of decades, maybe less I guess. Preventing just one case of lung cancer could potentially pay for the systems on several buildings in medical cost savings and savings that would have been lost wages and productivity. More importantly preventing human suffering, that is if the system works.