Making green roofs greener

Dec 06, 2013 by Jenny Hall
Professor Liat Margolis at the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design. Credit: Christopher Wahl

Did you know that Toronto is covered in green roofs? Well, it's covered in roofs that were once green. Nobody knows if they still are.

This is the problem that motivates Professor Liat Margolis of the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design at the University of Toronto.

Thanks to a 2009 bylaw that mandated green roofs for new buildings over 2,000 square metres, developers city-wide are blanketing their buildings in plants. But since the city has no power of inspection, no one knows if the roofs are thriving.

Worse, no one knows if they're doing what they're supposed to: help with and cooling in the urban jungle.

Cities, with their miles of impervious surfaces, aren't able to absorb water when there's a storm. They're also hotter than the surrounding countryside. Green roofs have the potential to help with both these problems. Soil absorbs water, and plants, through the process of evapotranspiration, act as miniature air conditioners.

Sounds great in theory, right? But the problem is it's all theory: no one has comprehensively tested green roofs in Toronto.

"Toronto has a very particular climate," says Margolis. "We have a much bigger range between hot and cold and a lot more rainfall than most areas that have done studies."

Margolis is the director of an ambitious project situated on the roof of the Daniels building, where she and a multi-disciplinary team of professors, students and representatives from industry have constructed 33 test beds designed to hit upon the ideal recipe for optimizing green roofs in Toronto. The group is testing four variables: soil content, soil depth, amount of irrigation and type of plant.

"What you might design for Toronto is different from what you would design for Dallas,Texas," she says.

And yet green roofs across North America are largely the same. For example, the dominant practice is to plant a species called sedum. It comes in mats that are unrolled – like sod – for an instant green roof. Its drought-tolerance, says Margolis, may actually be a disadvantage when it comes to cooling. Sedum has evolved to hold onto as much water as it can, and it doesn't evapotranspire during the day, which is exactly when the cooling effects of green roofs are needed. And because it's a functional monoculture, made up of plants having a similar growth habit, when it's struck by pests or disease, the entire roof dies.

By contrast, Margolis and her team are testing a native mixture of meadow grasses and flowers that are diverse and known for their ability to release moisture into the air. The team is doing the same thing with their other variables. By testing various combinations, they hope to improve on the industry standard. How will they know they've succeeded? Each bed is outfitted with eight sensors that measure everything from rate of water runoff after a storm to moisture of the soil to air temperature above the bed. A weather station collects data on wind speed and direction, temperature, solar radiation and humidity. The instruments take readings every five minutes, and data are combined with field observations of the plants.

The test beds are monitored year-round to assess change over time. Armed with results from their lab in the sky, Margolis hopes the team will be able to influence the establishment of a made-in-Toronto green roof construction standard.

Margolis wants people to understand that green roofs are living systems.

"It's a mistake to think of green roofs as a one-size-fits-all product that you can cut and paste from one region to another like a tile."

Her bigger goal is to get people asking the right questions about sustainable cities.

"The problem with sustainability is that everyone thinks there's a downloadable checklist, a quick answer for everything. But we're talking about complex, comprehensive, dynamic systems. There are no easy answers."

Explore further: Green roofs may be a source of pollution

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Classification system proposed for green roofs

Oct 22, 2013

Green roofs (or living roofs) are becoming a growing trend in North America – and have been long established in Europe – for their value in conserving energy, improving air quality, managing storm water ...

Turfgrass tested in shallow green roof substrates

Oct 21, 2013

Green roofs, rooftops covered with vegetation, provide multiple environmental and aesthetic benefits. These "living roofs" are increasing in popularity worldwide. As more cities invest in green roofs, planners are challenged ...

There's no one-size-fits-all green roof, studies show

Apr 25, 2012

Green roofs – rooftops covered with a layer of vegetation–are getting a lot of credit for providing environmental benefits. They have been found to reduce storm water runoff from buildings, conserve ...

Recommended for you

Future of energy storage

1 hour ago

MIT professor Fikile Brushett is in the process of taking the power generated by wind and solar, chemically lashing it to molecules derived from flora and fauna, and storing it in liquids until it's needed ...

Toyota, Grenoble set stage for test in ride-sharing

Sep 14, 2014

Toyota is testing ride-sharing. As simple as that may sound, the experiment indicates an innovative model for the future of urban transportation. The Grenoble metro area could turn out to be the trial stage ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

J__rg
not rated yet Dec 07, 2013
One thing bothers me.
Over 13 years I am promoting modern green roof technology in North America. Every year I get at least 10 comments where people say that green roofs should be engineered to local conditions and the German model is not working everywhere.
Modern green roof technology is engineered to support plants – the same vegetation that is in this location or as an alternative, vegetation that makes it, from an economic and environmental point of view, reasonable to replace the piece of nature on top of a building that was lost by this building. The basic principals (air content, water content, nutrients content) and providing an ability for the plants to utilize them is everywhere on earth the same. It is about biology, chemistry and physics. Depending on the location, you might adjust the plant varieties and the depth but it won't change the basics.
Q: jIam looking at nature and seeing all introduced European and Asian plants that are doing very well, why?
J__rg
not rated yet Dec 07, 2013
Another thing bothers me:
Modern green roof technology on extensive green roofs don't need irrigation. If so, they defeat the purpose and they are not better than a golf course in the dessert.
Since nobody is irrigating nature and the idea modern green roof technology is engineered to do the same -avoiding irrigation.
Any research on green roof that includes irrigation, is research of a golf course in the dessert – without value for the industry.
Across North America there are already uncountable green roof without irrigation and they are performing well – they might not look all the time like a golf course in the dessert – they look like nature in this specific location. If that is problem – society has problem. Jörg (wishing the system supports Umlaut)