Cotton dethroned as king of South Texas crops

Dec 19, 2013 by Rod Santa Ana
Cotton modules await ginning at the Port of Harlingen. Experts say quarter million acre cotton crops in extreme South Texas are a thing of the past. Credit: AgriLife Communications photo by Rod Santa Ana

The days of quarter-million acre cotton crops in extreme South Texas are a thing of the past, according to Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service experts.

"Unless things change drastically, the days of 200,000 to 300,000 acre cotton crops here in the Lower Rio Grande Valley are long gone," said Dr. Luis Ribera, an agricultural economist at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Weslaco.

The conditions Ribera refers to are drought, the preference of growers to plant grain sorghum and uncertainties in the world cotton market due to China's huge and unpredictable influence.

"Cotton down here will never go away completely because it's a rotation crop for grain sorghum," he said. "Among other things, cotton as a rotation crop helps growers manage weeds in their sorghum crops, and vice versa. Unless a better rotation crop is found, cotton will still be grown here."

Growers in the four-county Valley planted a meager 88,772 acres of cotton in 2013, but harvested only 38,348 acres, according to figures supplied by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation.

"Only 43 percent of the 2013 crop was harvested, mostly on irrigated land," Ribera said. "The rest was lost to drought. Mexico delivered some of the water owed to the U.S., but not much. With reservoirs at Falcon and Amistad lakes at only about 40 percent of capacity, there's a lot of uncertainty going into next year's cotton crop, especially about what China will do."

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

Uncertainty means fewer acres planted, Ribera said. Despite July futures prices hovering at a "good" 82 cents per pound of lint, those prices could be artificial, leaving growers fearful the bottom could fall out at any second.

"The cotton market is now less about supply and demand, and more about what China does or doesn't do," he said. "They are the world's largest producer, importer and consumer of cotton, so what they do affects cotton growers everywhere."

China is currently buying up cotton, which is driving the price per pound higher, and storing it in huge amounts.

"The world's stock-to-use ratio of cotton is currently over 80 percent," Ribera said. "That's huge; it's usually much lower. In fact, I've never seen it higher than in the 60 percent range. China has the lion's share of that; more than half of that stored cotton is in China and they continue to buy."

But if they suddenly stop buying up lint, or decide to release their stockpile, the world price of cotton could plummet.

"So, the question is, how long will China keep buying?" he said. "The good news is they have internal pressures to continue buying because if they stop, the price drop would hurt their own farmers. So, they want the price to remain high. But how long can they keep it up there?"

Ribera thinks cotton growers today are still paying for the abnormally high price cotton was fetching in 2011.

"The price of cotton in 2010-2011 hit $2 per pound," he said, "which signaled the need for more cotton and the desire of growers to cash in, so more cotton was planted. That led to overproduction, lots of stored cotton and a price drop that's only being propped up by China's current buying spree."

The Valley has not seen a return to historically high-acreage since 2006 when 72 percent of the area's 255,000 acre crop was lost to drought, Ribera said. Crops have generally stayed under 100,000 acres since then, except for 2011 when prices hit $2 and 196,000 acres were planted, and last year when 137,000 acres were planted.

Danielle Sekula, an AgriLife Extension cotton integrated pest management entomologist in Weslaco, said recent rains in the Valley could boost cotton acreage this year, especially nearer the Gulf Coast.

"Even though there is a lot of uncertainty among growers due to water shortage," she said, "I think with the moisture we've received recently, we're likely to see more acreage planted this year than last, especially in Willacy County."

Explore further: Study: Cover crops use water, but benefit soil health

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Cotton economists unveil new global cotton outlook analysis

May 02, 2013

A new cotton outlook analysis from Texas Tech University's Cotton Economics Research Institute notes that global growth is projected to remain at 3 percent over the next five years, then slow by half a point during the following ...

Study: Cover crops use water, but benefit soil health

Dec 12, 2013

A continuing study of cover crops in the Rolling Plains has determined that yes, they do use water, but that doesn't necessarily translate into reduced cash crop performance, according to a Texas A&M AgriLife ...

Recommended for you

Study indicates large raptors in Africa used for bushmeat

Jul 24, 2014

Bushmeat, the use of native animal species for food or commercial food sale, has been heavily documented to be a significant factor in the decline of many species of primates and other mammals. However, a new study indicates ...

Noise pollution impacts fish species differently

Jul 24, 2014

Acoustic disturbance has different effects on different species of fish, according to a new study from the Universities of Bristol and Exeter which tested fish anti-predator behaviour.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jonseer
not rated yet Dec 20, 2013
Well this is fantastic news.

Growing cotton in water stressed areas is one of the most idiotic things we do in various places on the planet, and always its fueled by some sort of subsidy engineered by legal or corrupt influence buying by lobbyists of some sort.

Sorgum is at least edible.

I have nothing against growing cottom. I prefer to wear cotton clothing, but it should be grown where water supplies are plentiful and it should only be grown without subsidies that distort the market.