Chimp lawsuit falters in US courts

Dec 10, 2013
The Non Human Rights Project want chimpanzees to be given the right to freedom

Three US judges have rejected lawsuits demanding that chimpanzees be recognized as people with fundamental rights, an animal charity said Tuesday.

The Nonhuman Rights Project petitioned three courts in New York State in a bid to have the four moved to a sanctuary where they could live out the reminder of their days in freedom.

It based its petitions on behalf of chimpanzees Tommy, Kiko, Hercules and Leo on the principle of habeas corpus, which in New York allowed slaves to establish their right to freedom.

But all three judges threw out the applications on the grounds that habeas corpus does not apply to an animal. The charity says it will appeal the case.

"The struggle to attain the personhood of such an extraordinarily cognitively complex nonhuman animal as a chimpanzee has barely begun," said its president, Steven Wise.

The organization says Tommy is held in a cage at a used trailer lot while 26-year-old Kiko is deaf and living in a private home. Hercules and Leo are owned by a research center and used in locomotion experiments on Long Island.

Judge Joseph Sise of Fulton County Court said he would entertain a separate lawsuit seeking to right any wrongs to Tommy but could not consider him a person.

"The court will not entertain the application, will not recognize a chimpanzee as a human or as a person who can seek a writ of habeas corpus," he was quoted as saying by the charity.

Two other judges threw out the petition on the same grounds.

The Nonhuman Rights Project website has published biographies of the four chimps.

It said the day it visited Tommy, the temperature in his shed was about 40 degrees below what it would be in his native land.

"The only company he had was a TV that was left on for him at the other side of the shed," the organization said.

As for Kiko, the group said he is partially or totally deaf because of abuse suffered on the set of a Tarzan movie before being acquired by his current owners.

Explore further: Sexual selection isn't the last word on bird plumage, study shows

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Group seeks 'personhood' for 4 chimps in US (Update)

Dec 03, 2013

An animal rights group is asking New York courts to recognize scientific evidence of emotional and cognitive abilities in chimpanzees and to grant the animals "legal personhood" so that they are ensured better ...

From birth to death in four days: Kiko now a remnant low

Sep 03, 2013

A lot of things happen over a holiday weekend, and while people in the United States were celebrating Labor Day weekend, the Eastern Pacific Ocean's Tropical Storm Kiko came and went. Satellite data captured ...

Mother chimps crucial for offspring's social skills

Sep 06, 2013

Orphaned chimpanzees are less socially competent than chimpanzees who were reared by their mother. Researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, observed that ...

Research chimps to be sent to US sanctuary

Jan 23, 2013

(AP)—All but about 50 of hundreds of research chimpanzees belonging to the National Institutes of Health should be retired to the national sanctuary in northwest Louisiana, and all of them should have plenty of room to ...

UK court rejects bid to drop phone hacking charges

Jun 28, 2013

(AP)—Britain's Court of Appeal has rejected a bid by five defendants, including former tabloid editors Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson, to block their prosecution on charges of trying to intercept voicemail messages.

Recommended for you

A peek at the secret life of pandas

Mar 27, 2015

Reclusive giant pandas fascinate the world, yet precious little is known about how they spend their time in the Chinese bamboo forests. Until now.

Flocks of starlings ride the wave to escape

Mar 26, 2015

Why does it seem as if a dark band ripples through a flock of European starlings that are steering clear of a falcon or a hawk? It all lies in the birds' ability to quickly and repeatedly dip to one side to avoid being attacked. ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (4) Dec 10, 2013
just incorporate each chimp. problem solved!
1 / 5 (5) Dec 10, 2013
Progressives want to provide person hood to an animal, but fight tooth and nail for the right to deny person-hood for unborn humans. Why don't those that fight for these animals fight to prevent scissors from being jabbed into the brains of a human baby half born?
1.7 / 5 (3) Dec 11, 2013
Give personhood rights to chimps then why not extend them to Macaques and if them why not lemurs and so on to dogs, cats, mice ...

The bug in the argument for extending human rights to chimps is not that arguments do not exist--Peter Singer has done so famously--but any arguments for giving personhood rights to humans and not chimps faces the problem that it is arbitrary not to extend it down the "chain of similarity".

One day we may do that but what would it be like to live legally in a world where rats and the family pet have the same rights as humans and ones children?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.