Birth of black hole kills the radio star

December 20, 2013
If matter and antimatter repel each other, the quick conversion of one into the other inside a supermassive black hole may look like a Big Bang. Image credit: NASA

Astronomers led by a Curtin University researcher have discovered a new population of exploding stars that "switch off" their radio transmissions before collapsing into a Black Hole.

These exploding stars use all of their energy to emit one last strong beam of highly energetic radiation – known as a – before they die.

Up until now, it was thought all gamma-ray bursts were followed by a radio afterglow – a premise that a team of Australian astronomers of the Centre for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) at Curtin University and the University of Sydney originally set out to prove correct.

"But we were wrong. After studying an ultra-sensitive image of gamma-ray bursts with no afterglow, we can now say the theory was incorrect and our telescopes have not failed us," lead researcher and Curtin research fellow Dr Paul Hancock said.

The technique used to create the ultra-sensitive image was recently published in The Astrophysical Journal.

It allowed for the stacking of 200 separate observations on top of each other to re-create the image of a gamma-ray burst in much better quality – yet, no trace of a radio afterglow was found.

"In our research paper we argue that there must be two distinct types of gamma-ray burst, likely linked to differences in the magnetic field of the exploding star," Dr Hancock said.

"Gamma-ray bursts are thought to mark the birth of a Black Hole or Neutron Star – both of which have super-dense cores. But Neutron Stars have such strong magnetic fields (a million times stronger than those of Black Holes) that producing gamma-rays are more difficult.

"We think that those stars that collapse to form a Neutron Star have energy left over to produce the radio afterglow whereas those that become Black Holes put all their energy into one final powerful gamma-ray flash."

New work is underway to test the team's theory and to see if there are other subtle ways in which the two types of bursts differ.

"We now have to take a whole new look at gamma-ray bursts – so far this work has shown that being wrong is sometimes more interesting than being right," Dr Hancock said.

Telescope facilities such as the Australia Telescope Compact Array in northern New South Wales and the Karl Jansky Very Large Array in the US both have observing programs to search for gamma-ray burst afterglows and have been recently upgraded to increase their sensitivity.

Explore further: Strange new bursts of gamma rays point to a new way to destroy a star

More information: The research report can be found at

Related Stories

Earth's gold came from colliding dead stars

July 17, 2013

We value gold for many reasons: its beauty, its usefulness as jewelry, and its rarity. Gold is rare on Earth in part because it's also rare in the universe. Unlike elements like carbon or iron, it cannot be created within ...

NASA sees 'watershed' cosmic blast in unique detail

November 21, 2013

( —On April 27, a blast of light from a dying star in a distant galaxy became the focus of astronomers around the world. The explosion, known as a gamma-ray burst and designated GRB 130427A, tops the charts as ...

Glimpsing the infrastructure of a gamma-ray burst jet

December 4, 2013

( —A new study using observations from a novel instrument provides the best look to date at magnetic fields at the heart of gamma-ray bursts, the most energetic explosions in the universe. An international team ...

Fast radio bursts might come from nearby stars

December 12, 2013

First discovered in 2007, "fast radio bursts" continue to defy explanation. These cosmic chirps last for only a thousandth of a second. The characteristics of the radio pulses suggested that they came from galaxies billions ...

Recommended for you

Aging star's weight loss secret revealed

November 25, 2015

A team of astronomers using ESO's Very Large Telescope has captured the most detailed images ever of the hypergiant star VY Canis Majoris. These observations show how the unexpectedly large size of the particles of dust surrounding ...

Scientists detect stellar streams around Magellanic Clouds

November 23, 2015

(—Astronomers from the University of Cambridge, U.K., have detected a number of narrow streams and diffuse debris clouds around two nearby irregular dwarf galaxies called the Magellanic Clouds. The research also ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2 / 5 (5) Dec 20, 2013
I am wondering if we will discover that there are many kinds of magnatars like we now understand stars to be many different kinds.
Dec 20, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
1 / 5 (6) Dec 20, 2013
Pseudo-scientific metaphysical mumbo jumbo!
4.6 / 5 (7) Dec 20, 2013
magnatars are strange beasts. I am sure that with time we will begin to distinguish differences in the details.
5 / 5 (2) Dec 22, 2013
Pseudo-scientific metaphysical mumbo jumbo!

Thanks, but we already know what you have to peddle.
not rated yet Dec 26, 2013
"...In my mind and in my car, we can't rewind we've gone to far.
Pictures came and broke your heart, put the blame on VTR. ..."

am I the only one?
2 / 5 (1) Jan 12, 2014
"We think that those stars that collapse to form a Neutron Star ... produce the radio afterglow, whereas those that become Black Holes [do not]."


Perhaps those that become Black Holes do produce radio afterglows... BUT their radio afterglows are even MORE gravitationally red-shifted, than those from Neutron Stars... and so the signals are both weakened, and also red-shifted, beyond the wave-band investigated ?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.